Current events discussion

Of course Rob comes out as pro flag burning. Big surprise there.
Rob comes out for prottection of First Amendment rights that Trump is trying so hard to take away.

Of course Jimi comes out to have our rights stripped. Hell, Jimi doesn't even think we have innate rights as humans.
He wrote his thesis on it, and his view has been accepted worldwide.

Of course he won't share the thesis, and no one seems to know the worldwide acceptance of this "fact" except him and his 12 y.o. son, but why get crazy and introduce anything factual into the thread?
 
Last edited:
Someone needs his bottle and blankie.

1759711851354.png
 
CK was not a politician.
No shit Captain Obvious. The shooter said the murder was for political reasons.

Proof #1 the victim doesn't have to be a politician to be killed for political reasons.
"According to court documents, after extensive research and planning, Boelter embarked on a murderous rampage targeting Minnesota’s elected officials and their families. "

Elected officials are politicians.
What political reason did he kill them for? Oh that's right. The killer left a letter stating that it specifically WAS NOT political and that Tim Walz told him to put a hit out on people.

Proof #2 Just because the victims are/were political doesn't mean the crime was.

Strike two Rob...
Between the murders of Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman, one was political. The one committed by radicalized right-winger Vance Boelter.


Learn the facts before you attempt to mount a defense.
Well you are actually wrong so maybe YOU should do more or some or hell any research before you clap off at the mouth.
 
No shit Captain Obvious. The shooter said the murder was for political reasons.
Oh?
"His parents then asked their son why he committed this crime, to which he said "there is too much evil and the guy [Charlie Kirk] spreads too much hate," according to the charging documents."
Proof #1 the victim doesn't have to be a politician to be killed for political reasons.

What political reason did he kill them for? Oh that's right. The killer left a letter stating that it specifically WAS NOT political and that Tim Walz told him to put a hit out on people.
Going after multiple political figures is by definition poilitically-motivated action.
Unless you think it was just a wild coincidence that the targets were politicians?
Proof #2 Just because the victims are/were political doesn't mean the crime was.
See above.
Strike two Rob...

Well you are actually wrong so maybe YOU should do more or some or hell any research before you clap off at the mouth.
So, Tyler Robinson claimed a non-political reason.
Vance Boelter's reason was political.

Do your homework before you mount a defense.
 
Oh?
"His parents then asked their son why he committed this crime, to which he said "there is too much evil and the guy [Charlie Kirk] spreads too much hate," according to the charging documents."



Going after multiple political figures is by definition poilitically-motivated action.
Unless you think it was just a wild coincidence that the targets were politicians?

See above.

So, Tyler Robinson claimed a non-political reason.
Vance Boelter's reason was political.

Do your homework before you mount a defense.
Nobody cares what your reason is for labeling the crimes. The reasons are literally what the criminals who committed the acts say. You can go on being wrong the rest of your life.
 
Last edited:
Nobody cares what your reason is for labeling the crimes. The reasons are literally what the criminals who committed the acts say. You can go on being wrong the rest of your life.
Once again are easily proved wrong, and go off on one of your spins.

Can you show me the manifesto or letter where Boelter claimed Waltz gave him the orders to kill, or did you just hear the conspiracy somewhere and believed it b/c it supports the narrative?
 
Last edited:
I guy can tell you Rob, that he jumped off a bridge because he wanted to feel a rush he had never felt and you would argue with him claiming it was a ******* attempt. Go sit on a trash fire Rob.
That analogy shows how limited your intellect really is.

If you want to use one, at least use one that doesn't paint you as a gullible moron.
 
They happened to be politicians. That does not make it politically motivated. Try harder. I am sure if you keep telling yourself it was political it will become true.
Targeting politicians because they are politicians is not politically motivated?
Thjat's like saying the shitbags who bombed abortion clinics were not targeting abortion clinics/

Your defense is as weak as your intellect.
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,840
Views
456,263
Last reply date
Last reply from
Jimi77
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top