Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You can't even remember your own posts, but want us to think you are a bright guy who can keep up here?
Wow.

I remember just fine. You however get so excited too often and try to point the conversations in many different directions and it gets exhausting talking to you. So I just tune you out. Classy of you to turn a request for clarification into an insult. I expect nothing less from a person of your intelligence.

View attachment 68216

You called Charlie Kirk a racist and posted several things of him speaking in which he uses the word black to describe the people he is speaking about. He spoke nothing derogatory or racist in any way. You, however, used what he said to claim he is racist. That's when I came in. You can't scream racist just because someone uses the word black.

Do you remember now... dummy?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

@RobGMN Nothing to say now? I guess you just felt like insulting someone huh? Congrats.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Police drone tracks Walmart theft suspect in real time: Police

A California police department's drone program helped officers track down and arrest a suspected repeat shoplifter, officials said.

abcnews.go.com

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The wound doesn't make sense to me. No exit wound on an official report makes no sense to me, at all. That's what I'm stuck on. There's other things too but mainly that. I've watched too many ex military snipers talk about it.

So do you think Charlie Kirk has magic bones of steel? Doesn't that seem off to say that? I've shot rifles a bit, as a 10 year old I sighted in my own scope at 100 yards and had my hunting license, I've seen .30-06 wounds and others on many larger dead animals. I've never seen any bullet fired from a rifle unless small like a .17 or .22 that wouldn't have gone through his neck. It doesn't make sense to me. Even a smaller round like 5.56/.223 would have probably gone through. I mean for years I hunted white tail dear man, grew up around it- I do not buy he got shot with a .30-06 at all from that distance of 200 yards. It's too powerful.





This is what a .30-06 exit wound looks like on a deers neck that was shot in the jaw/neck area:


View attachment 68213

The wound doesn't make sense to me. No exit wound on an official report makes no sense to me, at all. That's what I'm stuck on. There's other things too but mainly that. I've watched too many ex military snipers talk about it.

So do you think Charlie Kirk has magic bones of steel? Doesn't that seem off to say that? I've shot rifles a bit, as a 10 year old I sighted in my own scope at 100 yards and had my hunting license, I've seen .30-06 wounds and others on many larger dead animals. I've never seen any bullet fired from a rifle unless small like a .17 or .22 that wouldn't have gone through his neck. It doesn't make sense to me. Even a smaller round like 5.56/.223 would have probably gone through. I mean for years I hunted white tail dear man, grew up around it- I do not buy he got shot with a .30-06 at all from that distance of 200 yards. It's too powerful.





This is what a .30-06 exit wound looks like on a deers neck that was shot in the jaw/neck area:


View attachment 68213

View attachment 68214

I don't think Kirk has magic bones. I do think it could be a defective round. Ie old, bad powder, not properly loaded, etc.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

@Jimi77 did you know about this?

Yeah, I think she deserved it.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Crazy thing is Muslims are always praying....

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Police drone tracks Walmart theft suspect in real time: Police

A California police department's drone program helped officers track down and arrest a suspected repeat shoplifter, officials said.

abcnews.go.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I remember just fine. You however get so excited too often and try to point the conversations in many different directions and it gets exhausting talking to you. So I just tune you out. Classy of you to turn a request for clarification into an insult. I expect nothing less from a person of your intelligence.

OK. So you tune it out when someone asks you to prove your baseless claims. An easy way to avoid it being known that you are a liar.
Cool.

You called Charlie Kirk a racist and posted several things of him speaking in which he uses the word black to describe the people he is speaking about. He spoke nothing derogatory or racist in any way. You, however, used what he said to claim he is racist. That's when I came in. You can't scream racist just because someone uses the word black.

If you think that claiming concern for a pilot's abilities simply because the pilot is black is not a racist thought, then you are even stupider than you have represented to this point.
Why the **** would a person's skin color have any bearing on whether they can fly a plane, if they have earned their pilot's license?

The fact that you don't even know that is a racist concern speaks volumes.

Do you remember now... dummy?

Remember me posting a quote of a racist remark that the P.O.S. Charlie Kirk said? I sure do.
Wanna see it again?
"If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified."
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

That is interesting. Can you cite the source of this fact?
Maybe a prosecutions-per-capita comparison of red and blue cities, or maybe a cases-declined-for-prosecution per capita list?

It'd be fascinating to look at some of the cases that were declined, by whom, and why.

The great thing about the intrawebz is you can do that research all by yourself. Just keep in mind The Blue's are playing dirty and choosing not to prosecute and thus the crime never happened.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

The great thing about the intrawebz is you can do that research all by yourself. Just keep in mind The Blue's are playing dirty and choosing not to prosecute and thus the crime never happened.

So instead of providing g proof to back your claim, you tell people to go find their own proof of your claim?
How very ThxOne of you.

Instead of all the above typing, why didn't you just post the facts? I assume you referenced facts when you made the claim.
Or did you just throw it at the wall, expecting that it will be accepted as fact, simply because you claimed it?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

https://www.zerohedge.com/political...d-manager-arrested-allegations-sadistic-abuse

 

[Old_Slapper]

I think the difference is the extreme right is tiny fraction of the right. The extreme left has (IMHO) engulfed almost the entire left.

There are quite a bit more extreme lefties. They like to get really aggressively worked up to hate the right. The extreme right just likes to make up conspiracies, but don't look to take it to a violent level. A far right will still kick it with a lib as long as they don't talk politics. A far left lib will not, under not circumstances, kick it with anyone on the right.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So instead of providing g proof to back your claim, you tell people to go find their own proof of your claim?
How very ThxOne of you.

Instead of all the above typing, why didn't you just post the facts? I assume you referenced facts when you made the claim.
Or did you just throw it at the wall, expecting that it will be accepted as fact, simply because you claimed it?

If it was an issue you actually cared about, then you'd research it. Reality is you just want argue and I'm not interested.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

There are quite a bit more extreme lefties. They like to get really aggressively worked up to hate the right. The extreme right just likes to make up conspiracies, but don't look to take it to a violent level. A far right will still kick it with a lib as long as they don't talk politics. A far left lib will not, under not circumstances, kick it with anyone on the right.

The lefties are emotional, so it's easy to get them worked up. Think about antifa & transtifa - they're so worked up that they actually believe they're battling a Fascist gov't.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

You called Charlie Kirk a racist and posted several things of him speaking in which he uses the word black to describe the people he is speaking about. He spoke nothing derogatory or racist in any way. You, however, used what he said to claim he is racist. That's when I came in. You can't scream racist just because someone uses the word black.

Do you remember now... dummy?

You have to remember that libs consider a conservative mentioning race in any way, shape or form to be racist. Hope that clarifies things.