Current events discussion

View attachment 67430


The drug analysis sure looks like someone ate their stash 🤔
He had a drug cocktail going, even caffeine. The only thing missing is alcohol. 🍸🍸🍸 I find it hard to believe anybody can look at that tox screen and say - wasn't the drugs, it was the knee in the neck. I can only assume none of these a-holes whining about how he was asphyxiated laid on the ground and let somebody put their knee on the neck like that.
 
Last edited:
Yup, you are a pure badass.
Another sarcastic sidestep.
By the playbook.
I know how many there were. Two autopsies and 3 pathologist.
OK. And?
“So in your opinion,” Nelson asked, “both the heart disease as well as the history of hypertension and the drugs that were in his system played a role in Mr. Floyd’s death?”


“In my opinion, yes,” Baker said.
And? Are you saying he would have died at that same time, even if Chauvin hadn't illegally restrained him?

So even without COVID, your brother would have died the same day due to the obesity that was a comorbidity?


Same creds you have.
Yet you know that the pathology report was "gibberish" and you know the autopsy results were incorrect.
Based on?
“So in your opinion,” Nelson asked, “both the heart disease as well as the history of hypertension and the drugs that were in his system played a role in Mr. Floyd’s death?”


“In my opinion, yes,” Baker said.

Who said he should have been dead before?
Enough drugs in him to kill a man was your description. So, he should have been dead.
Your defense for Chauvin, to prove his innocence.
Without air one cannot speak. He was complaining with words.
Oh? Tell us more about how you can't speak without enough oxygen.
People with severe asthma do it all the time.
Obviously that amount has killed people before for it to be a known amount that could kill a man.
You just clearly said that everyone is affected differently.

Tell us how you know it was a deadly amount for Floyd. Tell us the amount, the drug, and what is his "livable" amount.
Incorrect.
Great argument. Compelling, and rich.
And wrong.
You really have lived a sheltered life.
Says the 51 y.o. Who is back to living with his parents after his brother kicked him out, lol
Well then why isn't that written professionally, literally and with the correct terminology?
Because it is. Maybe you should ask for the kids' version, so you can understand it.
What did you do, delete it?
Huh?
You do love your stories, I'll give you that.

You must have. There are no mountains in Florida and neither am I.
OK. Regardless, gun possession for an ex con is a no-no. On a federal level.
Legal in 37 states... but not in your home country of Canada.
Huh?
Born and raised in the USA. Have the manifest from Ellis Island for one of my great-great-greats coming over. And I could carry a rifle in Canada if I wanted to.

You should get info before you fabricate beliefs and claim they are facts.
It makes you look dumb not to.
 
AI is taking over the world tomorrow 🤣

1756054457168.png
 
Another sarcastic sidestep.
By the playbook.
Such a badass.
And nothing. you asked a question. I answered it.
And? Are you saying he would have died at that same time, even if Chauvin hadn't illegally restrained him?
Illegally restrained him? Are you an idiot? It is the job of the police to arrest, restrain if needed, criminals who have broken the law. Are you saying they should have sent a social worker to have a talk with Floyd after he broke the law?
So even without COVID, your brother would have died the same day due to the obesity that was a comorbidity?
Now you are calling my brother fat.
Yet you know that the pathology report was "gibberish" and you know the autopsy results were incorrect.
Based on?
Not even close to what I said. Now you are back to making up stories I see.
Enough drugs in him to kill a man was your description. So, he should have been dead.
Your defense for Chauvin, to prove his innocence.
You are so dumb. Criminals get restrained ALL THE TIME and live. This one was full of drugs. He did this shit to himself. He ingested drugs, he broke the law, he was under arrest. **** him. Where is your bleeding heart for all the other criminals who get arrested, restrained, held down by 4 cops at the same time, get pepper sprayed, tazed, shot? Hmmm? STFU.
Oh? Tell us more about how you can't speak without enough oxygen.
People with severe asthma do it all the time.
Hold your breath and try to speak. Exactly. STFU.
You just clearly said that everyone is affected differently.
Fact. Try to dispute it.
Tell us how you know it was a deadly amount for Floyd. Tell us the amount, the drug, and what is his "livable" amount.
Because pathologist said so.
Great argument. Compelling, and rich.
And wrong.
Like your whole life.
Says the 51 y.o. Who is back to living with his parents after his brother kicked him out, lol
More personal attacks.
Because it is. Maybe you should ask for the kids' version, so you can understand it.
Another personal attack.
Huh?
OK. Regardless, gun possession for an ex con is a no-no. On a federal level.
You keep claiming it. Show how I am an "ex con".
Huh?
Born and raised in the USA. Have the manifest from Ellis Island for one of my great-great-greats coming over. And I could carry a rifle in Canada if I wanted to.
Manifest... were they cargo?
You should get info before you fabricate beliefs and claim they are facts.
It makes you look dumb not to.
Again, projecting your own negative on others.
 



1756060821747.gif





1756061031631.png




1756060971842.png

1756060983655.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Such a badass.
Such a talker, not so much a walker.
And nothing. you asked a question. I answered it.

Illegally restrained him? Are you an idiot? It is the job of the police to arrest, restrain if needed, criminals who have broken the law. Are you saying they should have sent a social worker to have a talk with Floyd after he broke the law?
Yes. Illegally restrained him. It was determined by the court. Did you not know the outcome of the hearings? Did you not know that Chauvin was convicted?

Maybe you should read the hearing Decision that confirms illegally restrained, before you make yourself look even less informed than you already do.


Now you are calling my brother fat.
You shared that information long ago. Was it just another lie?
Not even close to what I said. Now you are back to making up stories I see.
Oh? Seems like you are forgetting your own posts very frequently lately. Maybe you need a nap.
1756062309956.png

You are so dumb. Criminals get restrained ALL THE TIME and live. This one was full of drugs. He did this shit to himself. He ingested drugs, he broke the law, he was under arrest. **** him. Where is your bleeding heart for all the other criminals who get arrested, restrained, held down by 4 cops at the same time, get pepper sprayed, tazed, shot? Hmmm? STFU.
Yet another tangent to stray from the actual subject, and your obvious failure to comprehend what actually happened.
Why not just argue that Chauvin was never convicted, never incarcerated, and actually won his appeal? it would make as much sense as the nonsense you continue to spew about the case.
Hold your breath and try to speak. Exactly. STFU.
Huh? Care to explain the meaning of this tangent?
Fact. Try to dispute it.
Who is disputing it? You used it to refute my statement about other drug users not dying.
So, are you going to explain to all of us how you know FLOYD had enough in his system to kill FLOYD?

Everyone is different. Share your medical analysis of him that indicates he had enough drugs in him to kill him. Then explain why he was not dead prior to the illegal restraint.
Because pathologist said so.
Cool. Share the report, or excerpts from it, please.
Like your whole life.
Your list of false beliefs grows exponentially.
More personal attacks.
You can dish it out, but can't take it?
Ironic.
Another personal attack.
YOU are the one who said you couldn't understand the adult version. That's a fact.
A suggested solution to your problem is a "personal attack"?
Interesting.
Huh?

You keep claiming it. Show how I am an "ex con".
You keep claiming I'm a secretary despite all evidence I have shown to the contrary (even the mods have my direct contact info through my job).
If you can continue to do that, I will call you a a felon and ex-con until you provide evidence to the contrary. You have said more than enough so far to support my claim.
Which one of us is right?
Huh?

Manifest... were they cargo?
Oof. I guess you know nothing about Ellis Island, and the people who came here through it, or travel in general.
You need to experience the world a bit, kid. Stop living such a sheltered, uneducated, life.

"A manifest, customs manifest or cargo document is a document listing the cargo, passengers, and crew of a ship, aircraft, or vehicle, for the use of customs and other officials."

"Remember, ship manifest records were filled out at the ship’s Port of Departure, not at Ellis Island. The names listed on a manifest reflect the passenger’s “original” name and were not ‘changed’ at Ellis Island, despite this popular myth."
No, they were not "cargo". They were passengers.
Get an education, kid.
Again, projecting your own negative on others.
Ironic, given your confusion on the meaning of "manifest" above.
 
Last edited:
Such a talker, not so much a walker.
Billy Bad ***.
Yes. Illegally restrained him. It was determined by the court. Did you not know the outcome of the hearings? Did you not know that Chauvin was convicted?
How is law enforcement supposed to arrest someone who has broken the law?
Maybe you should read the hearing Decision that confirms illegally restrained, before you make yourself look even less informed than you already do.
No need. I watched it all as it happened.
You shared that information long ago. Was it just another lie?
So. You keep making personal attacks. Is that the game we are playing cause I can kick that up several notches.
Oh? Seems like you are forgetting your own posts very frequently lately. Maybe you need a nap.
View attachment 67456
Yes, the CASE TITLE is gibberish. You claim to understand the gibberish but not when I am directly calling the case title gibberish.
Yet another tangent to stray from the actual subject, and your obvious failure to comprehend what actually happened.
Why not just argue that Chauvin was never convicted, never incarcerated, and actually won his appeal? it would make as much sense as the nonsense you continue to spew about the case.
Oh I see... when someone makes valid points to the topic they are off on a tangent. Is that what you claim when you don't have the mental capacity to continue the conversation?
Huh? Care to explain the meaning of this tangent?
Sure, not that you will understand plain English either but here we go. If Floyd couldn't breathe then how was he talking and saying he couldn't breathe?
Who is disputing it? You used it to refute my statement about other drug users not dying.
So, are you going to explain to all of us how you know FLOYD had enough in his system to kill FLOYD?
Yes, because that amount has killed others. Therefore it IS enough to kill.
Everyone is different. Share your medical analysis of him that indicates he had enough drugs in him to kill him. Then explain why he was not dead prior to the illegal restraint.
I thought you were a critical thinker... sounds like you are a habitual arguer. It's a good possibility he just recently ingested the drugs before the police came to arrest him. I bet they were kicking in hard when he was on the ground.
Cool. Share the report, or excerpts from it, please.
New Report
Your list of false beliefs grows exponentially.
It's my opinion that your life is an unfulfilling one. Dead end job making up fraud to prosecute republicans.
You can dish it out, but can't take it?
Ironic.
Iconic. How is that osteoporosis coming along?
YOU are the one who said you couldn't understand the adult version. That's a fact.
A suggested solution to your problem is a "personal attack"?
Interesting.
Do you ever stop lying? I mean ever?
You keep claiming I'm a secretary despite all evidence I have shown to the contrary (even the mods have my direct contact info through my job).
If you can continue to do that, I will call you a a felon and ex-con until you provide evidence to the contrary. You have said more than enough so far to support my claim.
Which one of us is right?
I am right. You take paperwork to your boss (the Judge). You fill him/her in on the paperwork... you are a secretary man.
Oof. I guess you know nothing about Ellis Island, and the people who came here through it, or travel in general.
You need to experience the world a bit, kid. Stop living such a sheltered, uneducated, life.

"A manifest, customs manifest or cargo document is a document listing the cargo, passengers, and crew of a ship, aircraft, or vehicle, for the use of customs and other officials."

"Remember, ship manifest records were filled out at the ship’s Port of Departure, not at Ellis Island. The names listed on a manifest reflect the passenger’s “original” name and were not ‘changed’ at Ellis Island, despite this popular myth."
No, they were not "cargo". They were passengers.
Get an education, kid.
I hear ya. You wasted a lot of words to try to educate me on that which I already know. Why you chose THIS question to not take literal is beyond me. You could have just said no, they were passengers, not cargo.
Ironic, given your confusion on the meaning of "manifest" above.
Iconic. You keep assuming I was confused. I doubt they were passengers, they were probably crew shoveling coal and then escaped to the Island. Seem like the family motto. Cowards.
 
Billy Bad ***.
lol
How is law enforcement supposed to arrest someone who has broken the law?
Legally, and within department guidelines. It varies from state to state, and department to department.
There is no one-size-fits-all answer. Someone as smart as you claim to be should know this.
Chauvin did it both illegally, and outside of department guidelines.
No need. I watched it all as it happened.
Yet you still don't understand what happened.
Why is that?
So. You keep making personal attacks. Is that the game we are playing cause I can kick that up several notches.
if you don't liek them, then I suggest you stop doing them.
Continue giving and you will continue getting.
Do you consider that unfair? Too much suffering?
Yes, the CASE TITLE is gibberish. You claim to understand the gibberish but not when I am directly calling the case title gibberish.
The case title is obviously not gibberish to anyone directly involved. The fact that YOU can't understand it does not make it "gibberish".

I'll guarantee you don't understand this. "Gibberish"?
01000100 01101111 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01101110 01101011 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100111 01101001 01100010 01100010 01100101 01110010 01101001 01110011 01101000 00111111
Oh I see... when someone makes valid points to the topic they are off on a tangent. Is that what you claim when you don't have the mental capacity to continue the conversation?
Show me your "valid points" in this crap: "You are so dumb. Criminals get restrained ALL THE TIME and live. This one was full of drugs. He did this shit to himself. He ingested drugs, he broke the law, he was under arrest. **** him."
Sure, not that you will understand plain English either but here we go. If Floyd couldn't breathe then how was he talking and saying he couldn't breathe?
The same way that anyone else can do it. Someone suffering an asthma attack will say "I can't breathe", yet they are obviously taking in air.
Gee, do you think maybe not getting ENOUGH air while you are face down in the pavement with a knee on your neck might cause you to say "I can't breathe"?

Sine the concept confuses you, try this: Pinch your nose closed, put a drinking straw in your mouth, and breathe through nothing but the straw while jogging.
Tell us how well you "can breathe".

Yes, because that amount has killed others. Therefore it IS enough to kill.
Not relevant that it can kill others. Your defense is that it was deadly to Floyd.
Show me your analysis that it was deadly to Floyd.
I thought you were a critical thinker... sounds like you are a habitual arguer. It's a good possibility he just recently ingested the drugs before the police came to arrest him. I bet they were kicking in hard when he was on the ground
So your defense is speculation that is not proved by the autopsy?
You might want to go back to law school.
.

New Report

It's my opinion that your life is an unfulfilling one. Dead end job making up fraud to prosecute republicans.
Secretary or fraud investigator? You keep vacillating.
Make up your mind, convict.
Iconic. How is that osteoporosis coming along?
My bones are just fine. The nerves in them tell me so.
Do you ever stop lying? I mean ever?
Ironic, given that you have never once been able to prove that I "lie" here.
Why don't you man up and show us one of these thousands of "lies"?

I am right. You take paperwork to your boss (the Judge). You fill him/her in on the paperwork... you are a secretary man.
The judge does not work for my agency. They work for the court system.
Do you consider the people you deliver pizza to, your boss? How about the ones you delivered beer to? Or the ones you delivered Burger King to? All your "bosses"?

No wonder you can't keep a job. You don't even know who the boss is!
I hear ya. You wasted a lot of words to try to educate me on that which I already know. Why you chose THIS question to not take literal is beyond me. You could have just said no, they were passengers, not cargo.
I think ANY attempt to educate you is wasted words. You simply consider yourself right, and everyone else wrong, no matter what the FACTS show.

I took it literally. It showed you thought a manifest was only for cargo. Just another common word you were unaware of.
Iconic. You keep assuming I was confused. I doubt they were passengers, they were probably crew shoveling coal and then escaped to the Island. Seem like the family motto. Cowards.
Crew wouldn't be on the passenger manifest, genius.
Damn, you fail more with every sentence you post.

I wonder when you will hit rock bottom and reverse the trend.
Probably never.
 
Last edited:
lol

Legally, and within department guidelines. It varies from state to state, and department to department.
There is no one-size-fits-all answer. Someone as smart as you claim to be should know this.
Chauvin did it both illegally, and outside of department guidelines.
Clearly.
Yet you still don't understand what happened.
Why is that?
Clearly.
if you don't liek them, then I suggest you stop doing them.
Continue giving and you will continue getting.
Do you consider that unfair? Too much suffering?
Clearly.
The case title is obviously not gibberish to anyone directly involved. The fact that YOU can't understand it does not make it "gibberish".
Clearly.
I'll guarantee you don't understand this. "Gibberish"?
01000100 01101111 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01101110 01101011 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100111 01101001 01100010 01100010 01100101 01110010 01101001 01110011 01101000 00111111
The quick brown 🦊 jumps over 13 lazy 🐶.
Show me your "valid points" in this crap: "You are so dumb. Criminals get restrained ALL THE TIME and live. This one was full of drugs. He did this shit to himself. He ingested drugs, he broke the law, he was under arrest. **** him."
Clearly.
The same way that anyone else can do it. Someone suffering an asthma attack will say "I can't breathe", yet they are obviously taking in air.
Gee, do you think maybe not getting ENOUGH air while you are face down in the pavement with a knee on your neck might cause you to say "I can't breathe"?
Clearly.
Sine the concept confuses you, try this: Pinch your nose closed, put a drinking straw in your mouth, and breathe through nothing but the straw while jogging.
Tell us how well you "can breathe".
Clearly.
Not relevant that it can kill others. Your defense is that it was deadly to Floyd.
Show me your analysis that it was deadly to Floyd.
Clearly.
So your defense is speculation that is not proved by the autopsy?
You might want to go back to law school.
Clearly.
Secretary or fraud investigator? You keep vacillating.
Make up your mind, convict.
Clearly.
My bones are just fine. The nerves in them tell me so.

Ironic, given that you have never once been able to prove that I "lie" here.
Why don't you man up and show us one of these thousands of "lies"?
Iconic.
The judge does not work for my agency. They work for the court system.
Do you consider the people you deliver pizza to, your boss? How about the ones you delivered beer to? Or the ones you delivered Burger King to? All your "bosses"?
Clearly.
No wonder you can't keep a job. You don't even know who the boss is!
Clearly.
I think ANY attempt to educate you is wasted words. You simply consider yourself right, and everyone else wrong, no matter what the FACTS show.
Clearly.
I took it literally. It showed you thought a manifest was only for cargo. Just another common word you were unaware of.
Clearly.
Crew wouldn't be on the passenger manifest, genius.
Damn, you fail more with every sentence you post.
Clearly.
I wonder when you will hit rock bottom and reverse the trend.
Probably never.
Clearly.

There, conversation over. Now you can move on.
 
Clearly.

Clearly.

Clearly.

Clearly.

The quick brown 🦊 jumps over 13 lazy 🐶.

Clearly.

Clearly.

Clearly.

Clearly.

Clearly.

Clearly.

Iconic.

Clearly.

Clearly.

Clearly.

Clearly.

Clearly.

Clearly.

There, conversation over. Now you can move on.
Perfect example of how you act when proved wrong: Like a child.
 
He had a drug cocktail going, even caffeine. The only thing missing is alcohol. 🍸🍸🍸 I find it hard to believe anybody can look at that tox screen and say - wasn't the drugs, it was the knee in the neck. I can only assume none of these a-holes whining about how he was asphyxiated laid on the ground and let somebody put their knee on the neck like that.
Realistically if the cops handled him with kid gloves...he was probably gonna die since only he knew how much of what he took
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,858
Views
466,769
Last reply date
Last reply from
RobGMN
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top