Current events discussion

Obviously, he doesn't understand it takes inches or so of flesh to destabilize a .223 bullet. There has to be enough resistance on the front of the bullet for long enough, in order to make it tumble. Thin targets are often pierced, where thicker flesh targets cause bullets to tumble and it causes a massive exit wound. Our military 5.56 is designed to tumble because hollow points were banned in war, so making a bullet tumble and explode into fragments inside of someone's body is the next best thing.
So the bullet went THROUGH the cartilage, leaving a larger than .223 hole, that healed without a trace in two weeks?
On a 78 year-old man?

That's the magic fantasy we're going with?
 
A .223 KILLED a person behind him, and another one hit his ear, but left so little damage that it healed without any evidence of any injury, in two weeks.
On a 78 year old man.
You're delusional to believe his bullshit.

And how does an ******* Trump follower getting shot for breaking into the Capitol on January 6th, or Trump being a ******, prove that he got shot in the year?
What's the conspiratorial thread between the three?
WTF??? So his grazed ear couldn't heal in 2 weeks, that's the basis of your conspiracy? And they took out that fireman so Trump could use this event to create momentum for his campaign??? Wow
 
WTF??? So his grazed ear couldn't heal in 2 weeks, that's the basis of your conspiracy? And they took out that fireman so Trump could use this event to create momentum for his campaign??? Wow
If it was "grazed", it would have taken a chunk out, requiring reconstructive surgery.
If it was a through-and-through, it would have required reconstructive surgery.

Either way, there's no chance he was healed in two weeks with NO evidence of an injury.
A twenty year old can't heal that quickly, much less a 78 year old man.
 
You didn't say stream. You said needle diaclinal.

Diaclinal is an adjective, not a noun.
"a needle diaclinal" is just as stupid as saying "a sharp heavy" or "a pointy freezing" or "a fast angry".
It's nonsensical.

Maybe intellectuals sound nonsensical because you don't understand them, but they certainly don't talk like you think they do.
First off, don't correct me when I speak. If you know it is an adjective then simple comprehension should have finished the rest for you. You're stupid though so I expected nothing less than stupidity from you. Intellectuals sound nonsensical to morons such as yourself. Again, I am not surprised. Imagine a person so smooth in the brain that the thought of two descriptive words confuse them so.
 
Last edited:
A .223 KILLED a person behind him, and another one hit his ear, but left so little damage that it healed without any evidence of any injury, in two weeks.
On a 78 year old man.
You're delusional to believe his bullshit.
He must have planned the whole thing like Jan 6th huh. Hey kid, just aim for my ear but only graze it. I will add the blood for affect. STFU you stupid moron.
And how does an ******* Trump follower getting shot for breaking into the Capitol on January 6th, or Trump being a ******, prove that he got shot in the year?
What's the conspiratorial thread between the three?
An ******* Trump follower. Listen to yourself. You sure you aren't a Klan member?
 
If it was "grazed", it would have taken a chunk out, requiring reconstructive surgery.
If it was a through-and-through, it would have required reconstructive surgery.

Either way, there's no chance he was healed in two weeks with NO evidence of an injury.
A twenty year old can't heal that quickly, much less a 78 year old man.
Again, stfu moron. Do you think that only the amount of grazed you have in your head is the only amount something can be grazed??? God damn you are an idiot.
 
First off, don't correct me when I speak. If you know it is an adjective then simple comprehension should have finished the rest for you. You're stupid though so I expected nothing less than stupidity from you. Intellectuals sound nonsensical to morons such as yourself. Again, I am not surprised. Imagine a person so smooth in the brain that the though of two descriptive words confuse them so.
So you put two adjectives back to back, that describe nothing.

And you think that is how intellectuals talk.

Hearing intellectuals talk confuses you so much, your attempt to imitate them ends up with you making up nonsense sentences.

You might be dumber than I thought.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,861
Views
467,367
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top