Current events discussion

False. It was proven that there was never $400 million approved for Cyberdumpsters by the Biden Administration. The Trump admin tried to (unsuccessfully) sneak it through under the radar and were forced to trace it back after it came to light.

Yes....I'm really hating all the people out on the streets pointing out how "crime has stopped" in the past few months. lol.....did you even bother to read that ridiculous sentence before posting?

 
1743048041565.png
 
If you follow the logic train of the idiot in the video trying to defend Trump, that's exactly where it goes.
He's too rich to sexually assault someone?
What fekking moron has NO understanding of the power trip that rapists and ****** predators are on?
Except that wasn't his logic. In addition to the fact the Trump is rich and able to trade in his model wife for a new one every couple of decades, he is also banging **** stars on the side (Charlie Kirk conveniently skips the **** star part). But most importantly, this broad shows up out of nowhere 20 yrs later with accusations, lacking specifics, etc. She just isn't a credible person.
 
Except that wasn't his logic. In addition to the fact the Trump is rich and able to trade in his model wife for a new one every couple of decades, he is also banging **** stars on the side (Charlie Kirk conveniently skips the **** star part). But most importantly, this broad shows up out of nowhere 20 yrs later with accusations, lacking specifics, etc. She just isn't a credible person.
Except she told multiple people about it when it happened, she testified and was cross-examined for 3 full days in front of judge and jury, and her testimony couldn't be rebuked by Trump or his team of attorneys.

Trump's big defense was that she wasn't "his type", that he never met her (which was a lie), and that she was a "sick" "whacko".
Very compelling testimony.

What was it about her three days of testimony and cross-examination that you found to be not credible, that snuck past the judge, the jury, the attorneys?
 
Except she told multiple people about it when it happened, she testified and was cross-examined for 3 full days in front of judge and jury, and her testimony couldn't be rebuked by Trump or his team of attorneys.

Trump's big defense was that she wasn't "his type", that he never met her (which was a lie), and that she was a "sick" "whacko".
Very compelling testimony.

What was it about her three days of testimony and cross-examination that you found to be not credible, that snuck past the judge, the jury, the attorneys?
Anybody can be coached on what to say in front of a Judge and Jury. Has she made ANY money off of this? If she has made money from this then you have her motive.
 
Except she told multiple people about it when it happened, she testified and was cross-examined for 3 full days in front of judge and jury, and her testimony couldn't be rebuked by Trump or his team of attorneys.

Trump's big defense was that she wasn't "his type", that he never met her (which was a lie), and that she was a "sick" "whacko".
Very compelling testimony.

What was it about her three days of testimony and cross-examination that you found to be not credible, that snuck past the judge, the jury, the attorneys?
$83 Million just from Trump. You know damn well these shady, Trump hating, far left democrats said hey, we will guarantee you will win in court and you will be awarded MILLIONS of dollars if you testify against Trump and say this...

We guarantee victory because the prosecution AND the judge are on our payroll.

I wonder if DOGE will find any payments to her, her family or associates.
 
Except she told multiple people about it when it happened, she testified and was cross-examined for 3 full days in front of judge and jury, and her testimony couldn't be rebuked by Trump or his team of attorneys.

Trump's big defense was that she wasn't "his type", that he never met her (which was a lie), and that she was a "sick" "whacko".
Very compelling testimony.

What was it about her three days of testimony and cross-examination that you found to be not credible, that snuck past the judge, the jury, the attorneys?
Except she got some anti-Trump friends to say she told them about it. She is a sick whacko. I don't find these women who show up decades later very credible. I know this for sure, if this is the new standard, you, I, Thx and men across the nation (or at least NY) are liable to be sued like Trump was in a he said/she said case.
 
$83 Million just from Trump. You know damn well these shady, Trump hating, far left democrats said hey, we will guarantee you will win in court and you will be awarded MILLIONS of dollars if you testify against Trump and say this...

We guarantee victory because the prosecution AND the judge are on our payroll.

I wonder if DOGE will find any payments to her, her family or associates.
It's crazy that Trump did $83m in damages to a woman that is barely worth $1m. Not to worry Mrs Carroll, I'm sure some liberal studio will pay you to do a bio pic. Pretty scary for us normal dudes - think about it; some gal from 20 years ago, that you had a casual encounter with, can convince a few friends you did "bad thing" and sue you. For guys like me and you, this would ruin our lives.

If you think about further, almost every male USSC nominee faces this types of accusations. If the left can start taking these men to civil court and hammering them for $50m+ a pop, they can ensure that no men will except a nomination and load the USSC with women.
 
Last edited:
Told you


View attachment 64196

Get ready for mass depopulation
Ironically, I work with EHR software; I'm the guy who trains the docs how to use these systems. The downside, is I think you can end up with "singular" solutions to problems. This could be very similar to how we ended up with the mortgage crisis because the algorithm was told to push high risk loans through. And of course the AI will be there to maximize income/profits, so expect healthcare services to decline, while costs escalate.
 
Except she got some anti-Trump friends to say she told them about it. She is a sick whacko. I don't find these women who show up decades later very credible. I know this for sure, if this is the new standard, you, I, Thx and men across the nation (or at least NY) are liable to be sued like Trump was in a he said/she said case.
So she is a sick whacko who managed to get over on the judge, the jury that Trump's own attorneys selected, Trump, and Trump's attorneys.
And she started the ball rolling in 1996, because she knew she could some day use it against Trump when he ran for POTUS.

A sick whacko who is also criminal genius. A true Usual Suspect.

But Trump is VERY credible by repeatedly lying that he never met her, by stating publicly he can grab women by the *****, by stating he would never assault her because she is not his type (and then confuses her for his own wife), and by refusing to testify on his own behalf under oath.
Good stuff.

Any woman can bring suit against me if she wants. They don't win the case just by bringing suit. They win it the same way E Jean Carroll won it. And they wouldn't be able to win because they could not support the fraudulent claim.
Tell me, do you have women in your past who could sue you for **** and win?
 
Told you


View attachment 64196

Get ready for mass depopulation
So, no one will notice that the AI doctors are killing everyone off? HAHAHAHA
"Soylent green is PEOPLE!!! Auuuggggghhhhhhhhhh!!!!!"
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,716
Views
445,173
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top