Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No, but your Republican president does.

I know, Trump, Trump, Trump. Blah ******* blah blah.

The government does not exist to be a business. It exists to serve the people.

Yet it is. You poor naive idiot.

Ironic question of the day.

lol Right.

Of course not. Anything that screws with your narrative is irrelevant.

Unlike your ignorant ***, I do not have a narrative... I don't even have an agenda.

Based on your grammar, they are "teaching" kids it's OK to have actual ****** activity while they are physically in school.
What school is teaching this?

I know... you are stupid, needed clarification but you will blame my grammar. Ok kid.

You just defeated your own argument.
You are your own worst enemy.

You ***** *** leftest complain that if guns were banned that nobody would be hurt by them. My post is a commentary on that idiotic theory. I am not defeating my argument when you can't comprehend. Or do you just not know how painfully stupid these pink haired college moron kids are these days?

So, what's your panic over it? How does it make your daily existence worse?

Right.

Do you think that's his natural color?
Talk about ignorance!

I couldn't care less what he does to his face. You fuckers are the obsessed ones.

Educate me. Explain why gay marriage was banned, if not because of religiosos watnign to please their "god".

Really? You are close to my age. Did you not pay attention in the 1980's?

Which is bad, but blowing up abortion clinics is good?

I see, because I showed you that your party has cause far more damage you think that by default I think blowing up abortion clinics is good? I ask you again, are you retarded? By the way, both political affiliations have blown up abortion clinics. Dumb ***.

Nice fals equivalence.
Try staying on topic.

False equivalence? First, stop ******* up your spelling. 2nd, you don't think you liberal ******* lie and act like victims?

And your accusation has what to do with the myriad failures of logic and ongoing proof of ignorance you share here? Are you saying that your posts are somehow MY fault?

I am saying you are stupid yet you will claim everyone else is stupid.

You provided plenty of proof that your claims are lies.
You just aren't bright enough to know it.

Says you. Prove I don't own my home. Prove I don't own rifles and guns... come on guy, prove that shit. Otherwise YOU are the liar aren't you. Making claims you can't back up.

Self-reflectring when I ask you the casue of your incessant lies?
That would suggest I control your thoughts and actions.

That's is not what you were doing. You posted this...

"Mental defects, simple delusions, internet bigshot?" - RobGMN. A statement with a question mark.

Go ahead... make it make sense. I just assumed you were asking yourself a question, like a check list.

Those are anti-harassment laws.
It's not against the law to use the incoreect pronoun. It's against the law to do it as a form of harassment.

Can you read this?

Cities with pronoun protection laws

Does that say anti-harassment laws? No, it doesn't. It clearly says PRONOUN PROTECTION LAWS. Why do you have the nerve to say no, it does not say that, it says this?????? You are one ******* delusional idiot.

Do you think it's against the law to call a woman "Sir" by accident, when she has lost all estrogen, and has a whiskey voice?
Do you think it's against the law to do it time and time again, after you were corrected and it was explained to you that you were wrong?

Damn, you are one simple-minded rube.

Well **** face... go to one of those cities and make sure you don't use a persons preferred pronouns over and over as stated in their laws and you tell me.

Says the guy who thinks people with pink hair, piercings, brain/body mismatches, dark skin, etc, are somehow lesser human beings than him.

Wow... look at you slipping dark skinned people in there. **** you! I hope your cat commits ******* by jumping in a wood chipper you racist ****.

And, I'm the guy who wnats the Republicans out of office, so we can get things back on the right track.
Trump is failing again, and can't blame COVID this time.

No, you want to get back to the way things were when they benefited you. You are a narcissist. What is best for the greater population is the furthest thing from your mind. **** it up *****. Trump isn't going anywhere. You should have blamed Fauci for COVID. He green lit Gain of Function.

These aren't IQ tests, you rube.
They are statistics reported by the people THEMSELVES on what they have done in their lives.

Lemme guess: They've been fudging data for 35 years, just to make Republicans look bad, but no one has caught them yet?

More evidence:
View attachment 68444
“Polygenic scores predicted social liberalism and lower authoritarianism, within-families. Intelligence was able to significantly predict social liberalism and lower authoritarianism, within families, even after controlling for socioeconomic variables.

They are numbers close enough to not matter.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

This must have the left all torn up. He's an illegal, so that makes him a good guy and he got snagged in an ICE operation, so by definition he's innocent. OTOH, he's a white male cop - three of the most hated things in the world by Team Blue. What to do...

ICE arrests illegal alien serving as a local police officer in Suburban Chicago

While conducting targeted enforcement operations in Rolling Meadows on Oct. 15, ICE Chicago arrested an illegal alien from Montenegro who was recently sworn in as a police officer in the Chicago suburb of Hanover Park.

www.ice.gov

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

They are numbers close enough to not matter.

So know he's proven Team Blue is smarter than Team Red. Then why can't Team Blue answer "What is a woman?"

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So know he's proven Team Blue is smarter than Team Red. Then why can't Team Blue answer "What is a woman?"

It's not the only thing they can't figure out.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

And the left keeps losing their minds. TDS and Collective Narcissism are real.

More 'No Kings' protests are slated to take place on Oct. 18. Here's where.

Another round of "No Kings" protests are slated to take place in over 2,500 locations across the country on Saturday, Oct. 18. Here's where.

www.usatoday.com

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

How was this Karen elected to US Congress???

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I know, Trump, Trump, Trump. Blah ******* blah blah.

He's the current failing POTUS, you know.
You DO ***** when the past is brought up, you know.
This IS a "Trump being Trump" thread, you know.
Or maybe you don't know any of that. Wouldn't surprise me.

Yet it is. You poor naive idiot.

Cool. Show me how the US Government operates for profit.

lol Right.

"lol" The common singular response by people who have no argument, or their argument is so weak, even THEY know it.

Unlike your ignorant ***, I do not have a narrative... I don't even have an agenda.

Except to support the demented, diapered, Trump, at any chance you get. Even lying outright to do so.

I know... you are stupid, needed clarification but you will blame my grammar. Ok kid.

Commas are important to meaning.
You probably think "Let's eat, Mom!" and "Let's eat Mom!" are the same sentence.

You ***** *** leftest complain that if guns were banned that nobody would be hurt by them. My post is a commentary on that idiotic theory. I am not defeating my argument when you can't comprehend. Or do you just not know how painfully stupid these pink haired college moron kids are these days?

You think someone would complain about no one being hurt? Interesting.
I'm interested in hearing about the pink-haired stupid college kids. Compare and contrast with your success in life.
Average STARTING salary for a college graduate is close to $70,000 these days. Where you at?

Right.

I couldn't care less what he does to his face. You fuckers are the obsessed ones.

Says the guy running to a safe space when he sees pink hair.
Referenced it twice in a day, FFS.

Really? You are close to my age. Did you not pay attention in the 1980's?

The 1980's was WHY the right wants to ban gay marriage?
Interesting. Was there something in the Bible that said "In the 1980's, the right wingers shall ban gay marriage"?

Your explanation is anything but.

I see, because I showed you that your party has cause far more damage you think that by default I think blowing up abortion clinics is good? I ask you again, are you retarded? By the way, both political affiliations have blown up abortion clinics. Dumb ***.

More WARS were started int he name of Christianity than any other reason.
Your statistics are simply made up by you. Living in your own fantasy world.

False equivalence? First, stop ******* up your spelling. 2nd, you don't think you liberal ******* lie and act like victims?

Yes, false equivalence. Look it up.

I am saying you are stupid yet you will claim everyone else is stupid.

Nope. I am more than happy to point out smart people.
I am also more than happy to point out the stupid ones who refuse to accept they are stupid, and pretend they are the intellectual tough guy.

Says you. Prove I don't own my home. Prove I don't own rifles and guns... come on guy, prove that shit. Otherwise YOU are the liar aren't you. Making claims you can't back up.

Now that would be doxing you, wouldn't it? Not my style. If you request it specifically from me, I'll send you your own info about you.
But you'd have to verify your identity first, otherwise it might be doxing a person who you claim to be.
I'm game if you are.

That's is not what you were doing. You posted this...

"Mental defects, simple delusions, internet bigshot?" - RobGMN. A statement with a question mark.

Go ahead... make it make sense. I just assumed you were asking yourself a question, like a check list.

Ahhh, so the guy who always screams about context completely MISSED the context.
The CONTEXT being that I listed things you do, then posed the question of why. It went something like this:

Maybe that was far too complex a progression for you.
I'll try to dumb it down for you next time.

Can you read this?

Cities with pronoun protection laws

Does that say anti-harassment laws? No, it doesn't. It clearly says PRONOUN PROTECTION LAWS. Why do you have the nerve to say no, it does not say that, it says this?????? You are one ******* delusional idiot.

The examples you presented are of places that have blanket human rights laws and anti-harassment laws, such as the NYCHRL. They incorporate deliberate misuse of pronouns, along with other human rights violation, harassment violations.
Can you share a statute from your examples that is specific to pronoun misuse?

Well **** face... go to one of those cities and make sure you don't use a persons preferred pronouns over and over as stated in their laws and you tell me.

Typical response of a limited intellect.
So you want me to go harass someone, and see if I get in trouble for it?

Damn, you are dumber than a child.

Wow... look at you slipping dark skinned people in there. **** you! I hope your cat commits ******* by jumping in a wood chipper you racist ****.

YOU are the one who decided to bring up DEI in your complaints.
Did you not know that DEI involves people of color, amongst others?

No, you want to get back to the way things were when they benefited you. You are a narcissist. What is best for the greater population is the furthest thing from your mind. **** it up *****. Trump isn't going anywhere. You should have blamed Fauci for COVID. He green lit Gain of Function.

Are you suggesting a good economy only benefits ME?
Maybe that's not the way in your Communist beliefs, but here in the United States a good economy benefits EVERYONE.

They are numbers close enough to not matter.

Oh?
The Republican party has 3.6 million members who made it to post-grad. The Democrat party has 8.4 million members who made it to post-grad. More than DOUBLE.

You think more than a DOUBLING is not enough to matter?

I know you **** at math, but holy crap, that's as basic as it GETS!

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Rhut Roh!!!

White House says Supreme Court ruling could give them up to 20 more seats

The Supreme Court could strike down a key part of the Voting Rights Act, giving Republicans a major advantage in Congress.

www.newsweek.com

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

He's the current failing POTUS, you know.
You DO ***** when the past is brought up, you know.
This IS a "Trump being Trump" thread, you know.
Or maybe you don't know any of that. Wouldn't surprise me.

You have nothing else in your life to complain about. So you complain about what the left tells you to complain about.

Cool. Show me how the US Government operates for profit.

Nancy Pelosi's annual salary $174,000 - Net worth more than $240M. That's just one of you lefty criminals.

"lol" The common singular response by people who have no argument, or their argument is so weak, even THEY know it.

Or the common response to an argument that has been beat to death already.

Except to support the demented, diapered, Trump, at any chance you get. Even lying outright to do so.

Yeah, the goal of every person on the right.

Commas are important to meaning.
You probably think "Let's eat, Mom!" and "Let's eat Mom!" are the same sentence.

A smart person could figure it out without crying about a ******* comma.

You think someone would complain about no one being hurt? Interesting.

There you go again. Asking a question and then answering it.

I'm interested in hearing about the pink-haired stupid college kids. Compare and contrast with your success in life.
Average STARTING salary for a college graduate is close to $70,000 these days. Where you at?

They are dumb as a stump. Pretty sure that has been made clear in past post. I guess constantly clarifying for you is a prerequisite for posting in this thread. $70,000? Is that a lot to you?

Says the guy running to a safe space when he sees pink hair.
Referenced it twice in a day, FFS.

Must mean I some kind of phobia to the alternatively coiffed. Oh no!!!

The 1980's was WHY the right wants to ban gay marriage?
Interesting. Was there something in the Bible that said "In the 1980's, the right wingers shall ban gay marriage"?

Yeah, I didn't think you actually knew anything. Especially when you don't know what topic to Google search for.

Your explanation is anything but.

Maybe learn some history before you speak ignorantly on a subject.

More WARS were started int he name of Christianity than any other reason.
Your statistics are simply made up by you. Living in your own fantasy world.

Captain Obvious.

Yes, false equivalence. Look it up.

Jesus Christ. I don't have to look it up. I am wondering why you think it is the correct term to use.

Nope. I am more than happy to point out smart people.
I am also more than happy to point out the stupid ones who refuse to accept they are stupid, and pretend they are the intellectual tough guy.

I know, you have yet to admit your shortcomings.

Now that would be doxing you, wouldn't it? Not my style. If you request it specifically from me, I'll send you your own info about you.
But you'd have to verify your identity first, otherwise it might be doxing a person who you claim to be.
I'm game if you are.

You claim you know... prove it. Why would I help you along? You made the claims, back them up.

Ahhh, so the guy who always screams about context completely MISSED the context.
The CONTEXT being that I listed things you do, then posed the question of why. It went something like this:
View attachment 68446

Maybe that was far too complex a progression for you.
I'll try to dumb it down for you next time.

You complain about commas yet speak in incomplete sentences and want to talk shit? Really?

The examples you presented are of places that have blanket human rights laws and anti-harassment laws, such as the NYCHRL. They incorporate deliberate misuse of pronouns, along with other human rights violation, harassment violations.
Can you share a statute from your examples that is specific to pronoun misuse?

So you need MORE clarification? Are you feeling more stupid today? Ok...

Here is your clarification... stupid.

"It has been reported that Governor Jerry Brown signed into a law that would make it a crime to “willfully and repeatedly” decline to use a senior transgender patient’s “preferred name or pronouns.” SB 179 (“Gender Recognition Act”) was signed into law back in October. The law will allow individuals to update state-issued identification documents (including birth certificates, state identification cards, and driver’s licenses) to select “nonbinary” as their gender.

Specifically, S.B. 179 states: “It shall be unlawful for a long-term care facility or facility staff to take any of the following actions wholly or partially on the basis of a person’s actual or perceived ****** orientation, gender identity, gender expression, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status.” Among the unlawful actions are “willfully and repeatedly” failing to use a transgender person’s “preferred name or pronouns” after he or she is “clearly informed of the preferred name or pronouns.”

This law may also affect employment law, as employers should also allow both nonbinary and transgender employees to indicate their preferred name and choice of pronoun while updating their staff health records.

It is reported that a healthcare worker who is found guilty of repeatedly breaching the law would be facing a maximum fine of $1,000, a year in prison, or both.

Up until now, crimes of discrimination, were covered under California’s hate crime laws, which are covered under California Penal Code § 422."

Typical response of a limited intellect.
So you want me to go harass someone, and see if I get in trouble for it?

Wow... you really are brainless.

Damn, you are dumber than a child.

Says the retard.

YOU are the one who decided to bring up DEI in your complaints.
Did you not know that DEI involves people of color, amongst others?

I did not bring up DEI in this conversation. Nice try bigot.

Are you suggesting a good economy only benefits ME?
Maybe that's not the way in your Communist beliefs, but here in the United States a good economy benefits EVERYONE.

There you go again making false claims.

Oh?
The Republican party has 3.6 million members who made it to post-grad. The Democrat party has 8.4 million members who made it to post-grad. More than DOUBLE.

You think more than a DOUBLING is not enough to matter?

I know you **** at math, but holy crap, that's as basic as it GETS!

Close enough to not matter one bit. How many people are there total in America? Exactly.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You have nothing else in your life to complain about. So you complain about what the left tells you to complain about.

LOL. Says the guy crying about pink hair, body jewelry, gay people, people of color.
All the things that made him fail in life.

Nancy Pelosi's annual salary $174,000 - Net worth more than $240M. That's just one of you lefty criminals.

Nancy Pelosi's husband is an 85 y.o. venture capitalist. He

Barron Trump is 19 and in college, and his net worth went up by $150 Million since the diapered Donald took office.

You tell ME which person should be more likely to be worth a hundred million, or more.

Or the common response to an argument that has been beat to death already.

Yeah, the goal of every person on the right.

A smart person could figure it out without crying about a ******* comma.

Yet you still can't explain which of the two possibilities it is.
Why is that?

There you go again. Asking a question and then answering it.

Look up the meaning of "rhetorical".
Oh yeah, you don't know how. I'll help you:
rhetorical - (of a question) asked in order to produce an effect or to make a statement rather than to elicit information.

They are dumb as a stump. Pretty sure that has been made clear in past post. I guess constantly clarifying for you is a prerequisite for posting in this thread. $70,000? Is that a lot to you?

Ahhh "made clear" because ThxOne has said so.
$70,000 to start. More than you've made in any year in your life. Ten thousand more than the current US median salary.

Must mean I some kind of phobia to the alternatively coiffed. Oh no!!!

Sure seems like it.

Yeah, I didn't think you actually knew anything. Especially when you don't know what topic to Google search for.
Maybe learn some history before you speak ignorantly on a subject.

So you type all that, instead of explaining your theory that the 1980's caused a ban on gay marriage.
Which means you have no clue what you are talking about.
Again.

Captain Obvious.

Jesus Christ. I don't have to look it up. I am wondering why you think it is the correct term to use.

Apparently you DO need to look it up, if you think I used it incorrectly.
I'll help you. Again.
false equivalence - informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed, faulty, or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.[1] Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called "comparing apples and oranges

I know, you have yet to admit your shortcomings.

You claim you know... prove it. Why would I help you along? You made the claims, back them up.

Send me the 7th digit of your SSN, so I know that you are who you claim to be.
I'll share something about you.

You complain about commas yet speak in incomplete sentences and want to talk shit? Really?

Incomplete sentences can still convey a complete thought.
Failure to put in a comma can change the entire meaning of a sentence.

So you need MORE clarification? Are you feeling more stupid today? Ok...

Here is your clarification... stupid.

"It has been reported that Governor Jerry Brown signed into a law that would make it a crime to “willfully and repeatedly” decline to use a senior transgender patient’s “preferred name or pronouns.” SB 179 (“Gender Recognition Act”) was signed into law back in October. The law will allow individuals to update state-issued identification documents (including birth certificates, state identification cards, and driver’s licenses) to select “nonbinary” as their gender.

Specifically, S.B. 179 states: “It shall be unlawful for a long-term care facility or facility staff to take any of the following actions wholly or partially on the basis of a person’s actual or perceived ****** orientation, gender identity, gender expression, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status.” Among the unlawful actions are “willfully and repeatedly” failing to use a transgender person’s “preferred name or pronouns” after he or she is “clearly informed of the preferred name or pronouns.”

This law may also affect employment law, as employers should also allow both nonbinary and transgender employees to indicate their preferred name and choice of pronoun while updating their staff health records.

It is reported that a healthcare worker who is found guilty of repeatedly breaching the law would be facing a maximum fine of $1,000, a year in prison, or both.

Up until now, crimes of discrimination, were covered under California’s hate crime laws, which are covered under California Penal Code § 422."

None of which says you get punished if you make an error and call someone the wrong pronoun.

Damn, you need an adult in the house to explain stuff to you. Dad too busy? Since you were three?

Wow... you really are brainless.

You ask me to go harass someone, to see if the anti-harassment laws are real.
And you call ME brainless.
Holy phuq.

Says the retard.

I did not bring up DEI in this conversation. Nice try bigot.

So who is posting under your username, Michael?
Or is this not Michael that I am responding to? Was it Michael that posted the DEI references?

There you go again making false claims.

Hmmm, pretty sure it was you who said I only want things that affect me positively to improve.
"No, you want to get back to the way things were when they benefited you." - ThxOne.

Pretty sure a good economy helps us all. In America, anyway.
Communists like you could care less. You are upset that I want something that benefits all of the US.

Close enough to not matter one bit. How many people are there total in America? Exactly.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

LOL. Says the guy crying about pink hair, body jewelry, gay people, people of color.
All the things that made him fail in life.

I am? Mentioning something once or twice is crying about it?? WTF do you call your obsession with Trump??

Nancy Pelosi's husband is an 85 y.o. venture capitalist. He

Is he in the government? Is he Nancy?

Barron Trump is 19 and in college, and his net worth went up by $150 Million since the diapered Donald took office.

And?

You tell ME which person should be more likely to be worth a hundred million, or more.

Clearly Barron. He comes from a BILLIONAIRE'S FAMILY YOU IDIOT!!

Yet you still can't explain which of the two possibilities it is.
Why is that?

Can you?

Look up the meaning of "rhetorical".
Oh yeah, you don't know how. I'll help you:
rhetorical - (of a question) asked in order to produce an effect or to make a statement rather than to elicit information.

Again, I know what it means Rob. However, your, rhetorical, questions, get, treated, like, facts, by, you.

Ahhh "made clear" because ThxOne has said so.

Yes, more than once.

$70,000 to start. More than you've made in any year in your life. Ten thousand more than the current US median salary.

Hmmm, the first government contract I believe was just over $120,000. Rob, I am pretty sure you are wrong. That is simple math. You should be able to figure that out.

Sure seems like it.

To you, right? Because that is what you do... look for negative shit constantly. That is your whole damn life... a quest for anything negative so you can ***** and argue.

So you type all that, instead of explaining your theory that the 1980's caused a ban on gay marriage.
Which means you have no clue what you are talking about.
Again.

Oh I can. I know why you don't look for information that people tell you to look for on your own. You want other people to post shit so you can find a way to tell them they are wrong and argue with them. I said it before, you don't actually care to know anything, you are just in it to argue.

Apparently you DO need to look it up, if you think I used it incorrectly.
I'll help you. Again.
false equivalence - informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed, faulty, or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.[1] Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called "comparing apples and oranges

You are claiming I am comparing something... what might that be?

Send me the 7th digit of your SSN, so I know that you are who you claim to be.
I'll share something about you.

How about a picture of my cock? I'll show YOU something about me.

Incomplete sentences can still convey a complete thought.
Failure to put in a comma can change the entire meaning of a sentence.

So can a lack of a comma or a period or punctuation of any kind like the way I am doing right now with this run on sentence

None of which says you get punished if you make an error and call someone the wrong pronoun.

It CLEARLY says a fine and or jail time.

Damn, you need an adult in the house to explain stuff to you. Dad too busy? Since you were three?

He just left to go do something. How about your dad?

You ask me to go harass someone, to see if the anti-harassment laws are real.
And you call ME brainless.
Holy phuq.

Oh so you think I was speaking literally. I keep forgetting you are stupid and that is how you take everything. Literally. Iconic.

So who is posting under your username, Michael?
Or is this not Michael that I am responding to? Was it Michael that posted the DEI references?
View attachment 68447

That is not this conversation and I told you that in the previous post moron. Damn it must be really depressing knowing the only way you can get off is manually doing it yourself or paying for a hooker because nobody in their right mind "right" mind could stand to be around you.

Hmmm, pretty sure it was you who said I only want things that affect me positively to improve.
"No, you want to get back to the way things were when they benefited you." - ThxOne.

Pretty sure a good economy helps us all. In America, anyway.
Communists like you could care less. You are upset that I want something that benefits all of the US.

Your definition of a good economy does not encapsulate the whole country's view.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

View attachment 68449View attachment 68448

Maybe they should've had a better business model...

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I know it's odd but medical centers suffer from the same failings as any other business venture...and like most failed businesses...blame is usually shifted away from the proprietors..

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I know it's odd but medical centers suffer from the same failings as any other business venture...and like most failed businesses...blame is usually shifted away from the proprietors..

What kind of medical facility only makes money from medicaid?