if i dont go Fi ill prolly be going SI
What about the q compared to an Rl-p type driver? Will there be any tests done on that? I wouldn't be surprised if they turned out to be very similar drivers. But I will need you input before knowing anything like that. So let me know if you got anything planned along those lines.Still doing some testing with the Q..
So far it's very very very accurate and the low end is very impressive to say the least on a 500/1...
As soon as the celica is up and running i'm gonna do a drop in flop test vs. the mag that is in there and i'll give my opinion then...
With that said i'll say that its going to be hard to say which is 'better'...
Agreed. I think the Q Vs. the RL-p would be great.If we were to see a comparison review, by someone reputable. I would hope price/performance is noted.
The only driver I know right now mentioned in the same price range is the RL-p.
Every thing else is $40+
we'll be close.... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifRL-p, Q, Mag and a TC-2000 head to head to head to head would be nice.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
Agreed. I think the Q Vs. the RL-p would be great.
Subs like the mags and the TC-3000 are rated with twice the power handling, and seem to be in a different price range than the RL-p and Q series drivers. But it would be great to see which would perform better in that price range. So my vote goes to the RL-p, Q series comparison.
I was just thinking the RL-P was rated around 500rms, and I thought the Q's were around there to. But after checking I saw they were rated at 1000rms. Maybe I was looking at another line from them. My badThe 15 inch version's RMS and then cost
Mag --> 950/500 (low-hz)
Q ---> 1k/279
RL-P---> 6-700/250
TC-3000 --->1k/395
Couple q's....
a) I am looking at sealed in the 4 cf range
b) can 2 quad 1 ohm subs be wire to 1 ohm?