Bustin Windows only 130DB?!

[Evyn1]

How do these subs crack windows and only 130 dB?

If it’s not dB then how is the (window cracking) measured?

The Neo Subs seem to be the best at the measurement!?

Click to read more...

 

[Popwarhomie 5,000+ posts]

Was probably already cracked then the flex caused it to crack more. Took me over 155 to break my windshields.

 

[Evyn1]

Was probably already cracked then the flex caused it to crack more. Took me over 155 to break my windshields.

View attachment 48427

Might it be another besides DB?

 

[hispls 5,000+ posts]

How do these subs crack windows and only 130 dB?

There was already a crack in that glass.

 

[Evyn1]

Looked into Isobaric enclosures.

Scientifically proven to increase SPL, and VAS.

Though the cone area is the same, the (movement of air) takes less power and effort = Efficiency.
The reset is also quicker; The other sub is pulling the sub to reset = Efficiency.

So basically the conclusion is the Subs we’re able to crack the front windshield probably because
=
- Super Efficient.
- Super SPL.
- Super VAS.

Plus dual (4) Neo.


Still I’m pretty sure he said 130DB.
Possibly proof you don’t actually need that much DB to crack a windshield.

 

[hispls 5,000+ posts]

Possibly proof you don’t actually need that much DB to crack a windshield.

That crack is forming because there was already a chip there in the glass. Isobaric mounting isn't magic and is expected to be less efficient than the same number of drivers mounted normally in sufficient airspace.