Awesome story

[09civic 5,000+ posts]

tl;dr

cliffs?

 

[Slayerx 10+ year member]

tl;dr
cliffs?

Kid had brain cancer, father gave him marijuana oil to cope with chemo, kid no longer has brain cancer

 

[09civic 5,000+ posts]

Kid had brain cancer, father gave him marijuana oil to cope with chemo, kid no longer has brain cancer

gracias

 

[bubbagumper6 5,000+ posts]

All about the Vaporizers //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif

Do you actually own one or have you just hit one a few times? I own a pretty nice one (with a bag, but no it's not a volcano) and I've actually kind of stopped using it. It just doesn't give you the same high, it's too light for me. I can take 1/2 as much herb and hit the gravity bong and be twice as high....

 

[jco1385 5,000+ posts]

potheads

 

[bubbagumper6 5,000+ posts]

potheads

I accept that.

I just don't like being called a "stoner," I feel like that refers more to the people that do nothing with their life other than sit around and smoke. I've held jobs and am still in college getting decent grades (3.0GPA) so I don't think I fit in that category...I don't ever want to either

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

You could say that...
I like to think of it as a conclusion theory based on personal logic...

Fixed. IMO, 'scientific logic' would conclude that filtering the smoke through any material more substantial than a gas (air) would tend to capture more particulate matter from the smoke. The crap that collects in the bottom of a bong would tend to validate that theory. Also, if you've ever owned a water pipe with multiple water chambers for the smoke to pass through, you will notice that each successive water chamber is less dirty than the previous chamber, as the pipe is used, further validating that the water is cleansing the smoke at least to some degree. Ive never been concerned enough to research this any further however, so I was curious if you had. But it appears you haven't either, we both just use our 'common sense' and call it 'scientific logic'. =P

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

I accept that.
I just don't like being called a "stoner," I feel like that refers more to the people that do nothing with their life other than sit around and smoke. I've held jobs and am still in college getting decent grades (3.0GPA) so I don't think I fit in that category...I don't ever want to either

See this is the problem with potheads. You all are lazy and don't try enough. If you're going to do something, do it to the best of your ability. Smoke until you can no longer function properly or don't smoke at all. Lazy Potheads smh

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

See this is the problem with potheads. You all are lazy and don't try enough. If you're going to do something, do it to the best of your ability. Smoke until you can no longer function properly or don't smoke at all. Lazy Potheads smh

Obvious troll is obvious.

 

[Slayerx 10+ year member]

Do you actually own one or have you just hit one a few times? I own a pretty nice one (with a bag, but no it's not a volcano) and I've actually kind of stopped using it. It just doesn't give you the same high, it's too light for me. I can take 1/2 as much herb and hit the gravity bong and be twice as high....

I used to use a nice Extreme Q regularly, and always enjoyed it. I wouldn't say the amount of weed I went through was any different, but ya the high is different.

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

Obvious troll is obvious.

I accept that.

I just don't like being called a "late night troll," I feel like that refers more to the people that do nothing with their life other than sit around and post on ca.com all night. I work full time and go to college. I don't post much here (2.44 PPD) so I don't think I fit in that category...I don't ever want to either

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

I accept that.
I just don't like being called a "late night troll," I feel like that refers more to the people that do nothing with their life other than sit around and post on ca.com all night. I work full time and go to college. I don't post much here (2.44 PPD) so I don't think I fit in that category...I don't ever want to either

See this is the problem with late night trolls. You all are lazy and don't try enough. If you're going to do something, do it to the best of your ability. Troll until you can no longer function properly or don't troll at all. Lazy late night trollheads smh

 

[Bumpin' Goalie 10+ year member]

See this is the problem with late night trolls. You all are lazy and don't try enough. If you're going to do something, do it to the best of your ability. Troll until you can no longer function properly or don't troll at all. Lazy late night trollheads smh

Obvious mod is obvious.

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Obvious mod is obvious.

I accept that.

 

[bubbagumper6 5,000+ posts]

Fixed. IMO, 'scientific logic' would conclude that filtering the smoke through any material more substantial than a gas (air) would tend to capture more particulate matter from the smoke. The crap that collects in the bottom of a bong would tend to validate that theory. Also, if you've ever owned a water pipe with multiple water chambers for the smoke to pass through, you will notice that each successive water chamber is less dirty than the previous chamber, as the pipe is used, further validating that the water is cleansing the smoke at least to some degree. Ive never been concerned enough to research this any further however, so I was curious if you had. But it appears you haven't either, we both just use our 'common sense' and call it 'scientific logic'. =P

Yeah pretty much. I don't doubt that it filters it somewhat, I even said that. I just don't think it filters everything out like some people believe. We don't even know what it filters out. It might filter out one carcinogen completely but not even touch another, ya know? I'm starting to get kind of curious so maybe I'll have to do some research but I get the feeling I'm just going to find a bunch of discussions and theories and not a lot of actual studies, lol.

Also I've never seen a bong with more than one water chamber but I was literally just thinking about that and if it were possible...lol