I know. I don't use it myself either. Just stating why the xover section looks different on the AQ.its because bass boost is pointless....
Yeah I know makes you think the Hifonics is overrated huh?//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gifThe difference in ratings is funny to me. I know they could have different components in there to change the output, but a 600w swing between the 2608 and the cadence seems a bit dramatic.
The Bxi is not overrated, not the 08's.dadgum they both thump, its just people think the bxi is over rated which is dumb
Dadgum
Watch how the Cadence is going to be underrated by about 600 wattsThe difference in ratings is funny to me. I know they could have different components in there to change the output, but a 600w swing between the 2608 and the cadence seems a bit dramatic.
hmm i thought mine did, i might be thinking of my 1200d, on nvm after looking at the pix i took of my 1200d it doesnt either.AQ2200 does not have bass boost . Just gain , subsonic and LPF .
The latest run of AQ2200D's have a modest bass boost for those who think they need it.hmm i thought mine did, i might be thinking of my 1200d, on nvm after looking at the pix i took of my 1200d it doesnt either.
x2The latest run of AQ2200D's have a modest bass boost for those who think they need it.
Cadence usually rates its amps at a lower voltage than other companies. Hifonics rated the bxis at 14.4. That alone can mean a few hundred watts. AQ is built beefy ,prolly does a little over 2200.The difference in ratings is funny to me. I know they could have different components in there to change the output, but a 600w swing between the 2608 and the cadence seems a bit dramatic.