any good?

[96pfinderSE 10+ year member]

I been lookin at 1 15" eclipse ti (not the pro) and just wonderin who has heard one and what there input is on it. Also how do they do SPL wise?

http://www.woofersetc.com/product.asp?0=279&1=285&3=1613

this is the sub

Click to read more...

 

[Mackenzie 10+ year member]

Thats a great sub. It can definately hang with the best of them, and it sounds great while doing so. You can probably find some better prices elsewhere though.

 

[iagrdshaka 5,000+ posts]

Its a very good SQL subwoofer, but I have not heard any SPL scores on it. It is a little pricey //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/greedy.gif.5a53e6246569d7ab79867170f3b06629.gif

 

[supa_c 5,000+ posts]

For $500 there are better woofers out there.

You could get 2 nice subs for that 1

 

[Smac 10+ year member]

Ive heard some pretty good things about it

 

[BassAddictJ 5,000+ posts]

very nice woofer but they are correct when they say you can get better quality for the same price...if you want stictly SQ with good loudness then that will be good, but for the same money you can get a sub that'll (with the right install) sound just as clean but pound WWWWAAAYYY harder. brahma,XXX, 2 rl-p......the list goes on.......

for indo on those go to

http://www.reaudio.com

http://www.adireaudio.com

http://www.soundsplinters.com

 

[96pfinderSE 10+ year member]

yea man ive heard of all those brands

I think im gonna look at a brahma 15 though. Anyone have any spl score for one 15?

 

[PowerNaudio 10+ year member]

it does have some very nice fetures, like the "Bottomless" Design, the voice coil wont hit the magnet from high excursion. then there's the QCA (Quick Change Assembly) i think you can order the parts and fix it at home " not sure though" then there is the Xmaxone way) 1.75" ohhhhh nice. and it looks massive, may handle more then the 750 its rated at.

but then again, i haven't read any reviews.

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

then there is the Xmaxone way) 1.75" ohhhhh nice.

Regardless of what that link says, it does not have one way linear travel of 44.4mm

 

[96pfinderSE 10+ year member]

eclipses website say 1.75" 1 one way. I dunno though

 

[supa_c 5,000+ posts]

Their Xmax specs are way off.

 

[PowerNaudio 10+ year member]

Their Xmax specs are way off.

how you figured?

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

1.75" may be Xmech, but not Xmax.

The Ti and Ti Pro are both what is called an LGLC. They have a 1.4" tall top plate and a 2.3" long voice coil. So, they have 11.4mm of overhang. Now that is NOT xmax. LGLC drivers have an xmax much higher than overhang. As you move towards SGLC drivers, you see less and less of a difference between Xmag and overhang. That is one reason overhang isn't a reliable xmax spec, because it does not necessarily reflect the linear output capability of the driver. It is just an arbitrary measurement, with no real ability to account for differences in motor topologies. Actual xmax on those drivers is around 23-24mm. Their xmag is double overhang.

http://forums.caraudio.com/vb/showthread.php?t=94002&highlight=Eclipse

If anybody would know, it would for sure be Warbleed........

 

[PowerNaudio 10+ year member]

1.75" may be Xmech, but not Xmax.


http://forums.caraudio.com/vb/showthread.php?t=94002&highlight=Eclipse

If anybody would know, it would for sure be Warbleed........

thanks for the info!. its still a nice sub!.