//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gifJust to clarify....
The Rl-p's do not have a problem with their cones buckling.
Any well and consciously designed woofer with an aluminum cone will not suffer any problems. The subwoofer was designed to perform optimally with that cone, and was thorougly tested prior to being put into production.Okay - the concern about aluminum cones buckling....that's news to me.
Should I be worried about my M6? It hasn't shown any signs of giving me problems but now you guys have got me all paranoid...
Seriosuly? LOLBut then again, what quality woofer with an aluminum cone has had a problem with buckling?
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gif I don't mean to start an epidemic. I was simply stating the primary differences between the two materials as used in recent (3-5 years) history. Of the two materials, pulp > alum for strength *IN GENERAL*. Other then that, the rest of the driver is optimized around the given material.....Nick's comments were more of a "comparison"....Paper tends to have higher strength. He wasn't saying that everybody with an aluminum cone woofer should worry about their cones buckling.
Power capacity is not a woofer attribute. It's an enclosure / environment attribute.Aluminum cones are a very good heatsink- designed well , attributes to great frequency response, efficiency, durability, and power capacity over 'paper'