Alpines and the H701 + rux 701 Controller

[davidtemple 10+ year member]

I know few years ago I used a H701 with my alpine 9861 deck and also had the 701 controller it worked great for me in setting up my system. I sold them 701's last year now they are discontinued ( I know they show up all the time ) but is it possible to use the Alpine Imprint with an Alpine deck that is not listed?

What does all the big dogs do to setup their rides for SQ Competition?

thanks guys! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

Click to read more...

 

[James Bang 5,000+ posts]

ural concert.

pioneer p9

clarion drz9255

zapco dc ref

360.2

audison bit1

probably others with similar capabilities.

I'd personally stay away from the imprint. the h100 at least. the h650 is not bad.

 

[bass_lover1 10+ year member]

PPI DCX-730, if you can find one.

Oh, and I have a pair of L3s for sale //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[Beerdrnkr 5,000+ posts]

PPI DCX-730, if you can find one.
Oh, and I have a pair of L3s for sale //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

There's 2 DCX-730's on Diyma for sale right now.

 

[bass_lover1 10+ year member]

I think one sold already

 

[davidtemple 10+ year member]

Poop I was gonna grab a 360.2 RF but it will not let me run 3 way active up front...

 

[bass_lover1 10+ year member]

Pair it with an active HU and it should. As long as it has assignable outputs, it isn't a problem. I mean, one signal input from the HU can send signal to two different amps, the 360.2 splits it and you can adjust each individually.

When I finally get around to installing my DCX-730, the HU will handle the sub x-over and midbass x-over, the high output on the 9887 will be sent to the DCX, split there into separate channels, and the DCX will handle all processing so that out is split to two separate amps. This allows for 3-way front + sub.