9/11 Conspiracies ON NOW!

[MTXman 10+ year member]

History Channel, watch it before you make irrational decisions about this tragic day.

Get some facts to back up your opinions.

Click to read more...

 

[iagrdshaka 5,000+ posts]

Hopefully those Loose Change fags watch it and educate themselves

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

Hopefully those Loose Change fags watch it and educate themselves

Actually if it's the one that I watched the other day on History Channel.....the Loose Change fags are actually in the show.

 

[bgdre12 10+ year member]

ummm...they were discussin this on alex jones...the history channell used sum fishy stuff in their documentary. but i'll watch it to see their side of the story.

 

[HitManSE 10+ year member]

Hopefully those Loose Change fags watch it and educate themselves

They're actually on it.

Personally, im at the point of saying yeah some things were weird and still dont add up, but I really dont think an administration as stupid as this one is capable of masterminding something such as 911. Its very improbable, not impossible but very improbable.

 

[04silverz 10+ year member]

who says the administration was behind it? just bc the govt could have been doestn necesarily mean Bush. also its funny to me how many people listen to alex jones now.

i have to admit the two most fishy things about 9/11 are the "mystery tank" under the belly of one of the planes that crashed into the towers and the fact that a 767 would have had to have been less than 50 ft above the highway that runs by the pentagon inorder to have crashed into it at the angle it did and i would have to say thath is impossible for a plane that size and an amateur pilot to do,much less that there are no eyewitnesses that can say they saw a 767 hit or fly across the hwy. i mean in a city with traffic that bad, someone would ahve seen it

 

[CaliforniabOY5 10+ year member]

**** i missd it

 

[CaliforniabOY5 10+ year member]

missed**

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

i have to admit the two most fishy things about 9/11 are the "mystery tank" under the belly of one of the planes that crashed into the towers

Not familiar with that one.

much less that there are no eyewitnesses that can say they saw a 767 hit or fly across the hwy. i mean in a city with traffic that bad, someone would ahve seen it

There were hundreds of eyewitnesses. You can find eye witness accounts all over the internet (with references) of people who saw a commercial airliner strike the pentagon.

I think the main problem with 9/11 is that there are more myths than truths floating around, resulting in people forming opinions based on false information.

 

[04silverz 10+ year member]

Not familiar with that one.




There were hundreds of eyewitnesses. You can find eye witness accounts all over the internet (with references) of people who saw a commercial airliner strike the pentagon.

I think the main problem with 9/11 is that there are more myths than truths floating around, resulting in people forming opinions based on false information.

the tank im talking about is if you look at up close pics of the plane there is a distinct "tank" shape, similar to an external fuel tank for military planes or a missile pod, under the belly of the plane. ill try to google and post a pic or link. as for the second point, why did the govt come almost immediately and confiscate the only video that shows the explosion at the pentagon? also why is there no evidnece of a plane taht size crashing into a building? i.e. engines, tail section etc. diid it all just dissapear?

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

the tank im talking about is if you look at up close pics of the plane there is a distinct "tank" shape, similar to an external fuel tank for military planes or a missile pod, under the belly of the plane.

Honestly, I've never heard that one before.

as for the second point, why did the govt come almost immediately and confiscate the only video that shows the explosion at the pentagon?

To analyze the tape for investigative reasons and potentially hold it as evidence against those who carried out the attacks.

I'm no law enforcement expert, but from my layman's understanding of crime scene reconstruction/investigation and criminal prosecution, it's fairly standard practice to obtain any taped footage from any crime scene. And I would think time would be of the essence or you run the risk of the tape being lost, damaged, tampered with, etc.

also why is there no evidnece of a plane taht size crashing into a building? i.e. engines, tail section etc. diid it all just dissapear?

A plane that size crashing into a structure of that material traveling at that speed isn't going to stay together for too long after impact. For some reason people expect to find whole wings and tailpieces just laying on the lawn of the pentagon and the fuselage sitting inside of it.......that simply wasn't going to happen given the nature of the incident.

And there are pieces evident in the pictures of the Pentagon (but ofcourse.....those who believe in the conspiracy pass them off as being "planted at the scene").

 

[iagrdshaka 5,000+ posts]

Squeak said it best. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif There were plenty of eyewitnesses at the scene of the Pentagon and pieces of the plane were at the crash site. lol

 

[04silverz 10+ year member]

Squeak said it best. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif There were plenty of eyewitnesses at the scene of the Pentagon and pieces of the plane were at the crash site. lol

eyewitnesses are often the worst clues in a crime. if 10 poeple see something happen you will get 10 different accounts.

personally i dont hold any real opinion about any of this anymore. it is what it is and nothing willl change what happened or what has happened bc of it. back when i was a huge stoner i very much believed that the govt was directly involved. now, not so much but i am more in the line of thinking of they just kind of stood by and let it happen. much like pearl harbor.

 

[04silverz 10+ year member]

Squeak said it best. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif There were plenty of eyewitnesses at the scene of the Pentagon and pieces of the plane were at the crash site. lol

At the 9-11 Pentagon, we are supposed to believe that a 757, traveling at 300 Knots dove over a batch of construction equipment, immediately adjacent to the Pentagon wall, then leveled out; and did a totally perfect strike at the convenient “Least-Risk Point.” Thereafter, it morphed its way through three rings of the Pentagon, turning left and right through the linking hallways, leaving a handful of aircraft pieces which defy accountability. All that, without damaging or burning the Pentagon lawn! All that by a pilot known to be an idiot at the controls of a small plane.

As George Nelson, Colonel, USAF (ret.), pointed out, NONE of the "found" parts have part numbers or serial numbers on them; not at the Pentagon and not at Pennsylvania! For production control, manufacturers stamp such 'part' numbers on virtually EVERY piece of an aircraft. The major components are found with the manufacturer's serial numbers. Clearly, someone went to a lot of trouble to 'sanitize' the 9-11 pieces. Anyone with experience around aircraft accidents will cite the total lack of serial-numbered parts as IMPOSSIBLE.

i know manufacturers do this bc i work on a/c

But, there is one detail which eliminates 99% of the "witnesses," instantly - what they DON'T describe!
No one described being terrified by the noise of a large low-flying jet aircraft.

The aircraft was alleged to have passed low over major buildings, yet no one describes it as "big;" certainly not "deafening." A B-757 is supposed to have passed low over so many people, yet no one was frightened by the overwhelming noise of a 757, doing 300 Knots. That noise would have been more memorable than most visual details.

The approach-departure "Doppler Effect" would have left a frightening impression, as the frequency of the engine noise built, then faded. Still, there are no such descriptions.

/QUOTE]

 

[Motley 10+ year member]

I'm watching it right now!