2 ZX2500.1s Vs. 1 Atomic 3000.1

[MEMPHISFLEX 10+ year member]

hmm everything ive ever seen about atomic has said they are OVER, not underrated...
whats so good about running .25 ohms daily, when you can get more power (if the atomic's infact do those 3kw, then at .25 ohms on the atomic i am willing to bet the zx will outdo them depending on your electrical system) @ 2 ohms from the zx?

No the atomics are very underrated, just like the RD Audio 3250.1 and the Sundown 3000.1!!!

 

[IgnoreMe 5,000+ posts]

show me some proof then.

Heres a little test I did today

Vac 64.4

amps 75.1

voltage went down to 11.8 volts from 13.7 volts

4836 watts at 11.8 volts //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eek.gif.771b7a90cf45cabdc554ff1121c21c4a.gif //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif

reactive load .86 ohms

side note my other dmm's battery was dying and the vac was very, very jumpy so I used the clamp. Overall very satisfied //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

egg

reactive load of .86

4800 watts out of a 7000.1....hmmmm

 

[MEMPHISFLEX 10+ year member]

Yeah your point is, 4836wrms @ 11.8v is alot of power???? So im not sure what your getting at??

 

[BassAddictJ 5,000+ posts]

Yeah your point is, 4836wrms @ 11.8v is alot of power???? So im not sure what your getting at??

ya at 11.8v im sure most amps will do under rated power....

im wondering if the OP ment to say 2 zx2500.1 vs 1 atomic 5000.1

either way, im partial to the kickers....efficent and *****ing

 

[IgnoreMe 5,000+ posts]

Yeah your point is, 4836wrms @ 11.8v is alot of power???? So im not sure what your getting at??

whats your point? you said severely underrated...

you are at .86 ohms after box rise, starting at 13.7v and dropping to about 12V and you are under by 2200W //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

ive seen better numbers from TONS of amps at 12V and less that still did over rated power....thats my point

 

[MEMPHISFLEX 10+ year member]

Ok then well see!! I got proof coming!!

 

[IgnoreMe 5,000+ posts]

Ok then well see!! I got proof coming!!

its possible that the 3000.1 is a better amp (i know the rd1750 or whatever used a shitty board that did under rated power by quite a bit) so its possible that maybe the 7000.1 use a board with a similar issue, but ive seen enough to put me off from atomic amps from that thread, and a few others.

i mean look at the 40.1. rated at 3600, but scottie johnson says they do 4400-4800 @ 1 ohm. and they supposedly use a similar board (not similar, but from the same mfg). the 3000d does over rated power, and supposedly used the same board. who knows, but my opinion will probably not be changed unless you got some proof from some reliable sources. and btw, i dont consider 500W being "very very very underrated" //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[sundownz Pro Seller]

its possible that the 3000.1 is a better amp (i know the rd1750 or whatever used a shitty board that did under rated power by quite a bit) so its possible that maybe the 7000.1 use a board with a similar issue, but ive seen enough to put me off from atomic amps from that thread, and a few others.

That was the RD 2200 watt model, actually //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[IgnoreMe 5,000+ posts]

That was the RD 2200 watt model, actually //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

ahh, the 1750 was the good one and the 2200 was the shit one. thanks for clearing it up.

ill put it this way though. with the zx, you will be getting anywhere from 5kw to 6kw and all at 2 ohms a piece. great power and great effeciency. unless the atomic is 2-3kw underrated you would be better off with the kickers. and just for shits and giggles, lets say the 3000.1 does put out 5kw, its gonna be at such a low impedance that you will make more power with the more effiecient amps anyways.

 

[RE_XXX]

I disagree, those MT's wont last as long daily with 2500+ watts going to them as 2000+ watts from the atomic. I dont have proof but i have tested atomic amps and they are underrated. but also that was with a good 13.5 volt source. plus he can wire down for comps, those kickers i dont see doing .5 ohms. wont be very competition ready, doing the same power to subs as ur daily, compared as to what he could do with a different amp.

 

[MEMPHISFLEX 10+ year member]

Yeah so you all think i should go with one atomic for now, then get another one sometime soon??

 

[casper97ta 10+ year member]

I disagree, those MT's wont last as long daily with 2500+ watts going to them as 2000+ watts from the atomic. I dont have proof but i have tested atomic amps and they are underrated. but also that was with a good 13.5 volt source. plus he can wire down for comps, those kickers i dont see doing .5 ohms. wont be very competition ready, doing the same power to subs as ur daily, compared as to what he could do with a different amp.

What are you retarded?? An MT will take 2500w all day everyday and then some.

To the OP, stick with the 2 Zx's.