Recent content by inanod

now thats good CS

Loyd, i just go by what i have observed on the forums over the years. ben has told me nothing about the past, nor do i ask. i hardly believe all that i hear. i am not here to question you either, because in all honesty, i hold you in high regards. you do have to understand where i sit, as do...

it's been a hoot, but i have a life to live outside the box. see ya later, same bat time, same bat channel....

not at all :hilarious

if i were in a position to rep a company at the present moment, i would. how is it in any way professional to come on a forum say "brand X is crap, they ****, the owner is a dick" soandso AAA audio it's not, i'll leave it at that

i am not trying to diss anyone. but name calling doesn't produce the neccassary facts to prove a case. all it does is, well, prove that i or anybody else can call names.

sniffle sniffle all you want.... if you are repping a company or a product, there are places you cannot and should not go. whether it be about the company you rep or the competitions.

i agree with you 100% on this

obviously. you have done a fine job of proving this statement.

haha, this is the foolishness i am talking about. a newb with 14,000+ posts. he possess so much knowledge, he retains so much information about the subject at hand, that he offers this. the best thing that his narrow mind can produce for a good arguement. "absolutely nothing"

...... wow, when did britney dye her hair????? i have been working too much, time for TRL zzzzzzzz

- you damaged the sub, therefore it was not a manufacturer defect. you are responsible for the cost of the replacement. - no company has the right to charge your CC without permission, regardless of it being on file or not. this is and will always be illegal. as far as customer service is...

i agree, 300 out of 1000 drivers that are in need of repair is not a good number. just curious, did all of these damaged drivers have the same common problem? with the 15A it was obvious. they all had the same problem, failure at the T-joint. it had not a thing to do with the cones breaking...

i honestly don't have anything to prove. it doesn't effect me either way whether ED fails or succeeds. you are the one making the accusations, so i expect you to be the one to lay out the hard evidence.

2 for 5, what about the rest and where does the 4th buildhouse come in? i surely hope you aren't counting ID as the forth