Current events discussion

[Old_Slapper]

This is exactly how the dems are responding to the Epstein files.

 

[Old_Slapper]

Like I said: let California succeed from the union, and that all of the red welfare states pay their own farking bills.
No more of this Republican welfare state nonsense.

Then, we can see which states survive the longest.

LOL...
If you would only open your eyes to the big picture, you wouldn't be so naive. Instead of picking just one form of government assistance, why not look up which states receive the most government assistance? Blue states require twice as much, per capita.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So if a guy jams his fingers in your wife or daughter without consent, you'd consider him a good candidate for POTUS.
Got it.

So if some broad you crossed paths with 25 years ago pops back up with accusations with no evidence and her accusation is carefully crafted in a way that you can't provide an alibi, you should be exempt from public service and owe her millions. Got it

You think there has to be a victim for a crime to be committed?
Reckless driving can result in a felony conviction. name the victim for me.
Carrying a pistol without a license can be a felony. Name the victim.
Mortgae fraud can be a felony, even if the mortgage is not defaulted on. Name the victim.
Possession with intent to distribute can be a felony, even if no distribution occurs. Name the victim.
Consporacy to commit murder can be a felony, even if no murder occurs. Name the victim.

Reckless driving isn't elevated to a felony unless there was a victim or extenuating circumstances.
CCW without a permit again isn't a felony without victims or extenuating circumstances.
Mortgage fraud is largely ignored until there is a victim.
I feel bad that you aren't able to discern the massive gulf between conspiracy to distribute and or commit murder and hiding a payment to keep a ho quiet.

Therein lies the problem. NOT FOLLOWING THE RULES.
The rules wre not followed, hence TAX CHEAT.

It's really weird how people think that becasue they dislike or disagree with a law, then the law must not carry any weight or be valid.
Why is that?

What tax law did Trump violate? Really you should just stop posting. It's better to remain quiet and not confirm you are indeed an idiot. No wonder The Learing Center was able to fly under your radar for years.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Your delusions grow by the passing day my friend. From your multiple spelling errors stemming from your rage to the hypotheticals you lefties cling to just so you can claim to hate Trump.

IF a guy jams his fingers in your wife or daughter...? Can you be specific or does your whole entire leftest argument stem from being as vague as possible? Chest? Shoulder? Arm? Eye? Where is this finger hypothetically going?

No victims needed for a crime? Well for the crimes YOU claim Trump was convicted of there are specific victims aren't there. None seem to have surfaced though have they? Interesting.

The point of the tax laws is that he IS following them just like your Democrat friends do. When he made that clear to Hillary you noticed she couldn't deny it. Knowing how to use the law, including loopholes does not mean a violation of the law.

Rob, get your head out of the far left liberal medias hypothetical a$$.

Just another Team TDS NPC....

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

LOL...
If you would only open your eyes to the big picture, you wouldn't be so naive. Instead of picking just one form of government assistance, why not look up which states receive the most government assistance? Blue states require twice as much, per capita.

Follow Robs logic there... as idiotic as it is. He claims Red states take more from the government. He said this:

"Like I said: let California succeed from the union, and that all of the red welfare states pay their own farking bills.
No more of this Republican welfare state nonsense.

Then, we can see which states survive the longest."

So we cut off red states and see who last the longest... hmmm would that be the BLUE STATES that still take money from the government??

This moron acts like only red states get government funds.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Here is an idea. ALL STATES GET EQUAL FUNDING FOR ANY AND ALL GOVERNMENT FUNDED PROGRAMS NO MATTER WHAT COLOR THE STATE. Find the average and that is what every state gets. No more, no less, no matter what. Let's then see which states tax the hell out of its citizens... hint, Blue States. Who will you blame then Robbie?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

LOL....
More irony.

You didn't answer my questions.

Did the cop, who shot Michael Brown in Ferguson, really murder Michael Brown?
Did the cop, who shot Trevon Martin in Florida, really murder Trevon Martin?

I dunno. Did they?

And, make an effort to learn what the word irony means.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

LOL...
If you would only open your eyes to the big picture, you wouldn't be so naive. Instead of picking just one form of government assistance, why not look up which states receive the most government assistance? Blue states require twice as much, per capita.

A state that is not self-sufficient is not self-sufficient, no matter WHAT the per-capita numbers are.

CA is self-sufficient, even if their per-capita welfare is 10x Kentucky's.

Are you one of those guys who thinks that a loss on every widget sold can be made up in volume?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So if some broad you crossed paths with 25 years ago pops back up with accusations with no evidence and her accusation is carefully crafted in a way that you can't provide an alibi, you should be exempt from public service and owe her millions. Got it

So the whole court case was all carefully crafted and orchestrated, and EVERYONE involved was simply out to get Trump. His own advisers, his attorneys, his witnesses, the hand-picked jury, even himself with his own testimony.

Just one giant anti-Trump conspiracy.
Got it.

Nice tinfoil hat, by the way.
It suits you.

Reckless driving isn't elevated to a felony unless there was a victim or extenuating circumstances.

It CAN be. Even without a victim.

CCW without a permit again isn't a felony without victims or extenuating circumstances.

You really should try some due diligence before you make statements you can't back up.

Mortgage fraud is largely ignored until there is a victim.

Crime stats say you are wrong, but they're likely faked to make Trump look bad.

I feel bad that you aren't able to discern the massive gulf between conspiracy to distribute and or commit murder and hiding a payment to keep a ho quiet.

The discussion was your claim that Trump didn't break the law since there "was no victim", which is a foolish supposition by someone trying to say that Trump didn't break the law.

What tax law did Trump violate? Really you should just stop posting. It's better to remain quiet and not confirm you are indeed an idiot. No wonder The Learing Center was able to fly under your radar for years.

So maybe you should do some due diligence, or remain quiet. Follow your own advice.


Lemme guess: Fake news?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

@Eggs

Here's the latest news on the apartments that were taken over TDA in Aurora. Funny how this paper says there is no evidence that the apartments were taken over by TDA; Aurora Sentinel used to be less biased. I guess we're supposed to ignore what we saw with our 2 eyes; those guys banging on doors with guns in hand were actually the property management company. They just have a zero tolerance policy on late payments. The property managers were also probably responsible for stealing and stripping cars in the streets in the area.

Anyway, the city condemned and seized the apartments and now they've sued/settled with the owners for I'd guess $500k. So the owners not only lost the property without compensation, but have to pay the city for taking the property, because the property got taken over by gangs because Denver is a Sanctuary City and Aurora decided not to enforce the law. So who the fudgsicles is going to invest in apartments in these rougher neighborhoods? Who would even invest in a marginal neighborhood; 10-20 years later, the neighborhood goes south and the city uses it as an excuse to grab your property - F that. My guess is they want to go "Mamdani" and the city(s) will just keep condemning and seizing property because gov't housing is awesome sauce.

Aurora settles lawsuit with shuttered 'Edge at Lowry' apartment owners for $300K - Sentinel Colorado

“The agreement requires professional security at the closed apartment complex until it is sold or rehabbed.”

sentinelcolorado.com

Gentrification

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

“Mike”