Current events discussion

Dude, the vaccines didn't save anybody and hurt more than they helped, it's ridiculous you still think that lol
Clearly it did save lives prior to omicron and demonstrated high efficacy against Delta and pre Delta variants. "You guys" just blame anything you can vaugely associate to the vaxs on the vax. Vauge accusations that my genome is being rewritten, etc, etc.
 
Think whatever you like... It's your right.
Not according to you.
I was never bestowed this right by anyone, so I must not have it.

Which you are doing by mentioning Jesus and or religion. What is confusing you?
You lost yourself in the argument.
Whether I believe in religion or not has nothing to do with what others believe.

Again you egomaniac, not giving you what you demand doesn't not mean unable.
"egomaniac".

Ironic coming form the guy who thinks he is just as much an expert as anyone else.
The guy who thinks he knows more than all of medical science.
The guy who thinks he know more than all mathematicians.
The guy who thinks he knows more than all sociologists, philosophers, law professionals, anthropologists.
The guy who thinks he knows more than our country's founding fathers.
Really?

Yes, REALLY. Try to keep up.
It's listed in the very definition under 18 U.S.C. §921, and in the page that opens from the link you shared.
Pictures aren't enough. Try to learn what words mean.

Definitions-
(3) The term “firearm” means (A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon; (C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer; or (D) any destructive device. Such term does not include an antique firearm.

1754593732251.png

I too have access to information.
Not much help when you don;t understand what it means, huh?
1754593766454.png

1754593792637.png

9mm pfft. Are you a woman?
Would my .357 be more impressive to you?
 

Attachments

  • 1754593436641.png
    1754593436641.png
    80.6 KB · Views: 9
  • 1754593712410.png
    1754593712410.png
    25.8 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
Roe v Wade is a great example since it involves women's rights. And what do women do - lobby gov't to keep this right, vote to keep this right, etc. So women are clearly under the impression rights come from the gov't. Furthermore, we can all see the right is subject to time, State & other variables.
Have we reached a dozen posts where you fail to show how/when/where/by whom a right is bestowed upon us by the government?

If women do not have the innate right to get an abortion, that must mean no "back-alleys" will be performed ever again.
No woman will be able to go to another country and have one.
No woman will be able to take measures to self-abort.
They simply will not be able to do it.


Who was restricting colored people's rights prior to the Civil Rights Act? Who was enforcing colored people's rights post Civil Rights Act?
Rhetorical, or do you really want me to answer?
 
Not according to you.
I was never bestowed this right by anyone, so I must not have it.
Show me where I said that. Provide facts. Not something you assume is what I meant.
You lost yourself in the argument.
Whether I believe in religion or not has nothing to do with what others believe.
You're a hypocrite then. You don't believe in it but use it if you think you can win an argument with it.
"egomaniac".

Ironic coming form the guy who thinks he is just as much an expert as anyone else.
The guy who thinks he knows more than all of medical science.
The guy who thinks he know more than all mathematicians.
The guy who thinks he knows more than all sociologists, philosophers, law professionals, anthropologists.
The guy who thinks he knows more than our country's founding fathers.
These are all your twisted mental assumptions that you think are reality because they are in your head. The reality is you are literally the person who thinks they know more than
Medical Science
Mathematicians
Sociologist
Philosophers
Law Professionals
Anthropologist
Our Countries Founding Fathers

Why do I state this? Because you have been given facts from most if not ALL these sources and your arrogant *** argues in opposition every damn time.

Yes, REALLY. Try to keep up.
It's listed in the very definition under 18 U.S.C. §921, and in the page that opens from the link you shared.
Pictures aren't enough. Try to learn what words mean.

Definitions-
(3) The term “firearm” means (A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon; (C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer; or (D) any destructive device. Such term does not include an antique firearm.

View attachment 67042

Not much help when you don;t understand what it means, huh?
View attachment 67043
View attachment 67044

Would my .357 be more impressive to you?
Jesus Christ, you really are a fucktard. I posted that information to show you that I also know about what a firearm is and I can show you where the information is and that I am tired of you thinking you are in any position to educate me. You are stupid. You are arguing the proof I provided showing I know this information too. That's you, the dumbass.
 
Trump is really no smarter than the rest:


People have no clue how deadly this will wind up being. Ai + drones + NWO depopulation. Ai will use swarms of quadcopters to wipe people out of cities in the future.

"Under the regulation, commercial drones would operate at under 400 feet above ground, and operators would need Federal Aviation Administration approval to fly them in certain airspaces. The drones can weigh up to 1,320 pounds, including what they’re carrying."


View attachment 67018
View attachment 67019
Going back to my comment on Mouse Utopia. Why build a drone army to wipe us out, when they can just wait us out.
 
Show me where I said that. Provide facts. Not something you assume is what I meant.
."If the Government didn't give us the rights, how can they punish us for exercising them?"
You posit that the government GIVES us rights, not that they are innate.
YOUR words.
You're a hypocrite then. You don't believe in it but use it if you think you can win an argument with it.
Nonsensical, as are most of your posts.

These are all your twisted mental assumptions that you think are reality because they are in your head. The reality is you are literally the person who thinks they know more than
Medical Science
Mathematicians
Sociologist
Philosophers
Law Professionals
Anthropologist
Our Countries Founding Fathers
Says the guy who insists bones do not have nerves in them, averages are only for nefarious and lazy uses, a subset used to create an average cannot contain the average, human rights are not innate, a mono amplifier has multiple outputs, a silencer is not considered a firearm by the ATF, that it's illegal for a POTUS to sell oil from the SPR, and so on.
All in contradiction to what the experts know.

Why do I state this? Because you have been given facts from most if not ALL these sources and your arrogant *** argues in opposition every damn time.
"Because Thxone says so" is not a fact, no matter how much your inappropriately entitled self BELIEVES it is.
Jesus Christ, you really are a fucktard. I posted that information to show you that I also know about what a firearm is and I can show you where the information is and that I am tired of you thinking you are in any position to educate me. You are stupid. You are arguing the proof I provided showing I know this information too. That's you, the dumbass.
You posted it to try and show I was wrong when I said a silencer is a firearm.
Remember that time you made the stupid claim that the gov't isn't in charge of who and what creates firearms? It went like this:
"The Government is not in charge of who and what creates firearms.
When I countered with a challenge to make and sell a silencer, your retort included:
"So now it's making a firearm... not a silencer?" - a declaration that a silencer is NOT a firearm.

And then you went on to share the law that proves a silencer is indeed a firearm.
Once again, you shared a proof to support your argument, but it proved you wrong.
Ironic.
 
."If the Government didn't give us the rights, how can they punish us for exercising them?"
You posit that the government GIVES us rights, not that they are innate.
YOUR words.

Nonsensical, as are most of your posts.
Mother **** dude. You are as exhausting as a person can be. I am asking you a goddamn question. You non comprehending idiot. What level of reading and comprehension did you make it to? Serious question because this is the exact same type of question I asked about being an expert.
Says the guy who insists bones do not have nerves in them, averages are only for nefarious and lazy uses, a subset used to create an average cannot contain the average, human rights are not innate, a mono amplifier has multiple outputs, a silencer is not considered a firearm by the ATF, that it's illegal for a POTUS to sell oil from the SPR, and so on.
All in contradiction to what the experts know.
Go **** yourself liar.
"Because Thxone says so" is not a fact, no matter how much your inappropriately entitled self BELIEVES it is.

You posted it to try and show I was wrong when I said a silencer is a firearm.
Remember that time you made the stupid claim that the gov't isn't in charge of who and what creates firearms? It went like this:
"The Government is not in charge of who and what creates firearms.
When I countered with a challenge to make and sell a silencer, your retort included:
"So now it's making a firearm... not a silencer?" - a declaration that a silencer is NOT a firearm.
Now you are again telling me why I posted something. Go **** yourself liar.
And then you went on to share the law that proves a silencer is indeed a firearm.
Once again, you shared a proof to support your argument, but it proved you wrong.
Ironic.
Go **** yourself liar.
 
Mother **** dude. You are as exhausting as a person can be. I am asking you a goddamn question. You non comprehending idiot. What level of reading and comprehension did you make it to? Serious question because this is the exact same type of question I asked about being an expert.
Yet another question that if you need to ask, you shouldn't be part of the debate at all.
Just as dumb as "What makes them any more of an expert than me? They went to college and got degrees, so did I. I am sure we have learned many of the same things... so why am I different? Because I may have a different view or opinions?"
Go **** yourself liar.
Your post history proves otherwise.
Now you are again telling me why I posted something. Go **** yourself liar.
"The Government is not in charge of who and what creates firearms.
When I countered with a challenge to make and sell a silencer, your retort included:
"So now it's making a firearm... not a silencer?" - a declaration that a silencer is NOT a firearm.

Have you started making that silencer for my 9mm that is NOT considered a firearm by the ATF under the NFA, and 18 U.S.C. §921?
Go **** yourself liar.
Liar, huh? Was this posted by the frog in your pocket, or is your alter-ego at work again?

1754599359057.png



1754599485010.png

1754599431034.png
 
Have we reached a dozen posts where you fail to show how/when/where/by whom a right is bestowed upon us by the government?

If women do not have the innate right to get an abortion, that must mean no "back-alleys" will be performed ever again.
No woman will be able to go to another country and have one.
No woman will be able to take measures to self-abort.
They simply will not be able to do it.
WTF are you talking about??? Can you not see that cuts both ways? As a matter fact if we include baby's rights it cuts 4 ways. Again you're confusing an ability with a right.
Rhetorical, or do you really want me to answer?
Unfortunately, I really do want an answer.
 
Yet another question that if you need to ask, you shouldn't be part of the debate at all.
Just as dumb as "What makes them any more of an expert than me? They went to college and got degrees, so did I. I am sure we have learned many of the same things... so why am I different? Because I may have a different view or opinions?"

Your post history proves otherwise.

"The Government is not in charge of who and what creates firearms.
When I countered with a challenge to make and sell a silencer, your retort included:
"So now it's making a firearm... not a silencer?" - a declaration that a silencer is NOT a firearm.

Have you started making that silencer for my 9mm that is NOT considered a firearm by the ATF under the NFA, and 18 U.S.C. §921?

Liar, huh? Was this posted by the frog in your pocket, or is your alter-ego at work again?

View attachment 67045


View attachment 67047
View attachment 67046
Seriously, go **** yourself, liar.
 
But why do they need to hijack humanity? Why not just replace me entirely with a robot?
Because of your soul and what it does and the energy it makes and quantum transfers to your brain and that energy can't be replicated by ai, so ai has to merge with it to increase its own power and capabilities. The human brain is a special kind of processor in this planet that ai can't replicate, how the soul comes in through live human birth, so it has to hook into brains in order to extract that specific energy out of your brain computer and use your brain for ai's purposes.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,921
Views
480,356
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThxOne
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top