Current events discussion

Some more education for you Rob,

Omitting parts of a quotation​


Use an ellipsis (three dots) to omit or remove parts of a quote and show where you've removed text. Don't change the meaning of the quote when you do this. For example:


Gross (1996, p.137) points out that in the language it is (open direct quotation marks) "not only in the vocabulary…(dot dot dot), but also the grammar" (close direct quotation marks) that influences how and what we understand.

So put those ellipsis in that sig where you left off the word your.
 
Last edited:
Listen fucker, I am not going to sit here arguing semantics because your ego is too ******* large for your small brain.
You're not going to argue "semantics" when the very basis of the argument is your inability to understand the definition of "verbatim", and what a verbatim quote is?
semantics - the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning

You might as well say you're not going to argue HP when it comes to which engine will make a car faster.

Damn, you are so lost it'd be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
 
Last edited:
You're not going to argue "semantics" when the very basis of the argument is your inability to understand the definition of "verbatim", and what a verbatim quote is?
semantics - the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning

You might as well say you're not going to argue HP when it comes to which engine will make a car faster.

Damn, you are so lost it'd be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
Seriously, go back to school. Reeducate yourself.
 
Seriously, go back to school. Reeducate yourself.
Goddamn, I may have to modify my signature. "I'm not going to argue semantics", when we are literally arguing the MEANING of words.

You died on the hill pretty spectacularly.
Some more education for you Rob,

Omitting parts of a quotation​


Use an ellipsis (three dots) to omit or remove parts of a quote and show where you've removed text. Don't change the meaning of the quote when you do this. For example:


Gross (1996, p.137) points out that in the language it is (open direct quotation marks) "not only in the vocabulary…(dot dot dot), but also the grammar" (close direct quotation marks) that influences how and what we understand.

So put those ellipsis in that sig where you left off the word your.
"Ellipses are usually not included at the beginning or ending of a quoted passage in APA unless the ellipses are needed to prevent misreading."
"Ellipses should be used only in the middle and at the end of a quotation; they are not used at the beginning."

Dead on the hill once more.
 
Goddamn, I may have to modify my signature. "I'm not going to argue semantics", when we are literally arguing the MEANING of words.

You died on the hill pretty spectacularly.
No hill, you are just not capable of not arguing. Even when you are technically wrong.
"Ellipses are usually not included at the beginning or ending of a quoted passage in APA unless the ellipses are needed to prevent misreading."
"Ellipses should be used only in the middle and at the end of a quotation; they are not used at the beginning."

Dead on the hill once more.
So you just misquoted me on purpose then?
 
Last edited:
No hill, you are just not capable of not arguing. Even when you are technically wrong.

So you just misquoted me on purpose then?
It's a paraphrase. The quotes are to show it wasn't an expression of my own thought.

But that's probably too advanced for you, even though you should recognize the words.
 
It's a paraphrase. The quotes are to show it wasn't an expression of my own thought.

But that's probably too advanced for you, even though you should recognize the words.
So it's a paraphrase... to show it was neither one of our thoughts? What was your goal by posting that?
I know what the conversation was that led up to the statement that you partially quoted and are now saying is a paraphrase even though you aren't using different words, you just left off one word and posted your partial quote out of context from the original conversation. So again, what was your goal... what were you seeking to accomplish by posting what you posted?
 
Last edited:
So it's a paraphrase... to show it was neither one of our thoughts? What was your goal by posting that?
I know what the conversation was that led up to the statement that you partially quoted and are now saying is a paraphrase even though you aren't using different words, you just left off one word and posted your partial quote out of context from the original conversation. So again, what was your goal... what were you seeking to accomplish by posting what you posted?
Look at you, trying so hard to show you didn't die on your hill.
The hill where you started off saying that a quote must be every single word written or spoken, then went to it being paragraphs, then only sentences, then finally only part of a sentence.

You died at the very beginning of your argument.
 
Look at you, trying so hard to show you didn't die on your hill.
The hill where you started off saying that a quote must be every single word written or spoken, then went to it being paragraphs, then only sentences, then finally only part of a sentence.

You died at the very beginning of your argument.
None of this post is true and you are back to being a bold faced liar. If you are to ignorant to comprehend anything that you have to argue constantly then YOU are the problem. Liar.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,958
Views
514,487
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top