Figures! You spend all this time trying to find dirt on Trump, but you spend no time trying to make sure the people you are voting for are not corrupt. Again, this proves you are a weak minded party voter. You will vote for an extremely corrupt democrat just be he has the "D" next to their name. That's pretty sad!
I do t have to spend time trying to find dirt on Trump. He makes it VERY visible all the time. He does press conferences to tell us he's breaking the law.
He has a pretty puppet to stand in front of a room full of reporters and proclaim him god and get upset when the reporters call out Trumps failings.
I asked YOU to share the unethical things you keep asking about, but you refuse to.
Why is that?
Why not just Google "why people think Pelosi is corrupt." Are you afraid you will find corruption? How about looking into why he is the just about the highest trending stock investor. Look into how her wealth doubled during Biden's presidency.
I asked you why YOU think she is corrupt. Do you not know? Do you just say she is because you heard other people say it?
What is a corrupt act she has committed?
If Trump was guilty of participating in Epstein's human trafficking, then why is Trump so hard-up about releasing Epstein's report?
When did I say Trump was trafficking people?
LOL.... Dude... you are killing me right now with your engineering ignorance. Again what is the definition of a "bridge?" If the inputs/outputs are connected by tracers on a board, then wouldn't the tracers be called "the bridge?" Therefore, those inputs/outputs are internally bridged.
WHY would they put a jumper trace across two other traces, instead of simply ruin the traces together?
It would be inefficient design.
Show me a board from a mono amp that has two individual traces from the input jacks that are bridged by a third trace, which then has a trace goi g to the input side of the amp chip.
Explain why they would do that instead of simply overlapping the traces at the board edge, then running just one to the chip.
Holly crap!!! What kills me the most is knowing that you really think you know what you're talking about. Nobody said wires are used to bridge RCA's. Again, resort to the definition of a bridge. If a tracer is connecting to components, then that tracer is now called "a bridge." By the way, all the RCA grounds are bridged together. Just a little something to blow your mind. Please show me where someone said all signals wires in the RCA's of multichannel amps are internally bridged. Sounds like you're trying to divert the argument.
You're conflating terms. A trace between an RCA jack and an amp chip is indeed a bridge. It's a third component across two others.
Two wires twisted together are spliced, not bridged.
By the way, that distribution strip is considered to be a bridge.
Is certainly would be.
Does it create more outputs?
Who said infrasonic filter? If it was me, then it was to subsonic filter and was a typo.
The wording on the amp is Infrasonic, which is the correct term for sounds below the common threshold of human hearing.
Please show where I stated that more bridges will equal more power?
You didn't. But more outputs on an amp mean more power. Each output comes from an amp chip.
Instead of trying to divert your claims of a Fosgate amp not being internally bridged, why not admit you were wrong?
The claim that s mono amp has multiple outputs that are bridged internally flies in the face of circuit design. It makes no sense.
If you make a claim that makes no sense, it's incumbent on you to prove it.
If I said "My cat flies around the house under its own power", it would be incumbent on me to prove it, not on you to disprove it.
No mono amp has multiple outputs. They're simply not made that way. Hence the name "mono". As in "one".
LOL... Again, I will ask where a court convicted him to be a ****** and a racist. I see your failed attempt to show he was a ******, but you have nothing to show he's racist. Therefore, you have to pull your racist claims out of your attacks on him.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html
He was busted for discrimination in his housing projects. Of course, he claimed innocence but paid the fines.
LOL... If you have proof for your claim, then yes. I showed proof by you not being able to speak against your political party. All you can ever say is "The only wrong they did was not being tougher against Trump." At the same time, you admitted, above, that you never looked into any accusations against a democrat to see if it's true.
See above. You have yet to share the accusations. Do you know any?
I was capable and have provided proof of my claims. Going off on a tangent on things I was not claiming, was stupid. Newsom is the man in charge. If a head of a company foolishly removes money and doesn't put money where it's needed, then that person is responsible. Newsom is the head of California.
How many tower/tanks in the fire zone?
What GPM rating are the pumps that fill the towers?
What reservoir/s feed them?
How much water in those reservoirs?
How many 2" fire hoses were running at the time the volume/pressure drop occurred?
I guess you got me! It is my job to go around and make sure everything is in order. In fact, I have plans, for 2 new buildings, sitting on my desk. I have to go through them and clean up the mistakes the engineers made. I just got back from cleaning up a mess where some contractors did follow the job scope properly. I'll tell you what, I'm the highest paid janitor in world. LOL...
It's your job to make sure "everything g is in order", yet you allowed for a water system that can't put out a 20,000 acre fire?
That's because he loves your attention.
lol
