Current events discussion

WAIT, WAIT, WAIT.... HIPAA violations, RobGMN do you actually even know what a damn HIPAA violation is or what it takes to violate HIPAA?

Are they disclosing any Protected Health Information?
Who enforces HIPAA RobGMN? The Department of Health and Human services.
Is the president above HHS? Yes. The president appoints the Secretary of HHS and the secretary is a member of Trump's cabinet.

What does this mean RobGMN? It means he isn't, they aren't violating anything. No matter how many liberal tears you cry.
 
Last edited:
"Accusations". We KNOW these people did not have access or data privacy training in the Treasury Department before.
You are now claiming they do, without any proof to back the claim, and with the evidence being against it (the evidence being that the people who would get them the training and clearance are the ones saying they shouldn't be accessing the systems).

It is far from an "accusation" to ask you to prove it.

You are asking me to prove a negative. Not how proof works.
You have proof they don't have the training, just accusation. But this has been the libs for years now; it’s all about the accusation. Give it a rest.
 
That's all democrat have left...they've gone so far to extreme left that'll it will take forever to approach the middle ground again...
They haven't even gone far left. They've just gone looney toons - ie ask a liberal "what is a woman?" It's really devolved into the party of ***** activism and name calling. All they can do at this point is oppose anything Trump wants to do. I wonder what they would do if Trump proposed increasing Corporate tax rates. They literally don't support rooting out wasteful gov't spending; that makes absolutely no sense. 🤡🤡🤡🤡
 
You must be one of those morons that things repetition makes fact. Maybe other morons you know fall for that shit. I don't.

And the water tower discussion is the PERFECT point. Your entire premise for vilifying Newsom about the fires was that the reservoirs were "empty" and that some "fire chief" told you it was Newsom's fault there was enough water to fight a 26,000 acre blaze.

And then facts started getting introduced to the conversation, and your premise collapsed like a crappy house of cards.
Typical.

Oh? I guess you missed the whole deal about info and links to Trump's leaked campaign dossier being remove from X, huh? Or about him screwing with the accounts of conservatives who disagree with Trump's immigration policies?
Try some due diligence before you speak of things you don't understand.
You stated that X would band you for speaking poorly against Trump. Now you're only pointing specific ones. I don't know the entire story behind them, nor do I care to research it. My response was proving you wrong that X account will not be deleted if you speak poorly of Trump. I proved you wrong, so now you're trying to flip the claims.

Nice try!


Do better, Slapper.
Tell me how many water tower/tanks in the area of the big fires.
Tell me the GPM rating on the tanks that feed those towers.
Tell me how many 2" hoses were running to fight said fires.
Tell me how many firefighters are on staff in the area.
Tell me about the "millions of dollars" in languishing equipment that could have been used to fight the fires.
Tell me how much water was in the upper and lower Hollywood reservoirs.

FACTS. Not your personal claims, or the pretend claims of some "fire chief" that doesn't even come close to existing.
Fact:
the questions you are asking about the towers are meaningless. The conversation was directed to only one tower. The one where the fire started. I explained this to you at least a half dozen times, and you insist on either playing stupid or you just don't have any sense of simple math.

I'll say this one more time.
Fact:
One tower was to have two sources to fill it. This is the tower where the fire started. For a year, one source was shut down. Due to this, the tower was not able to fill fast enough from just the one source. Do you now understand? Can you comprehend what I'm telling you, or do you need me to draw and picture?

Who TF said anyhting about gun ownership being "more dangerous" under Trump? You drinking early today?
I said gun ownership became more restrictive under Trump than under Obama and Biden combined.
It's a fact, despite any "twisted views" you may express otherwise.
So you are saying that Trump was harder on gun control than Biden? Ok, prove it? I'll listen. I know what laws each of them put in place, but I'm curious on how you believe this. At the same time, I would like you to research on the gun laws that Biden tried to put in place.

I know it was poorly written, but it is quite clear.

Name something that Biden did that was illegal and should have been brought to court.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone remember when Bill Cosby was the cream dream darling of the right? He showed America what a good household should be. Dad, Mom, happy kids. Never cursed in his comedy routines. A shining example of goodness.
Except he was drugging women so he could have *** with them.

Remember when Jeffrey Epstein was Trump's and the banking and financial world's cream dream buddy? I'm sure you know how THAT went.

If you think it's not possible for someone who did something good to do something bad, your rose-colored glasses need a new prescription.
Trump was such good friends with Epstein were such good friends that Epstein had a painting of Trump wearing a red dress in his office. There were also many reports of Trump, and his wife, flying out to Epstein's island. OH WAIT... my bad, that was Bill and Hillary Clinton that always went out there and it was bill that was in the painting.

Maybe you should get some glasses to see your lords are dirty of the same thing.



"Setting aside his business interests"? By lobbying for the elimination of the National Space Council, and having Trump listen to him?
Coincidence that Musk owns something called SpaceX? No conflict there, huh?
Because it's better to listen to someone who knows less?
 
WAIT, WAIT, WAIT.... HIPAA violations, RobGMN do you actually even know what a damn HIPAA violation is or what it takes to violate HIPAA?

Are they disclosing any Protected Health Information?
Who enforces HIPAA RobGMN? The Department of Health and Human services.
Is the president above HHS? Yes. The president appoints the Secretary of HHS and the secretary is a member of Trump's cabinet.

What does this mean RobGMN? It means he isn't, they aren't violating anything. No matter how many liberal tears you cry.
Apparently, I know more than you. Go read up on HIPAA, and what it entails.

I don't give a shit if the president is above health and human services; he doesn't just arbitrarily change the law depending on who he wants to follow it. That's not how law works.
He is not the supreme overlord of the country, no matter how badly you want him to be. No president has the authority to issue orders that break federal law.

You can post 10,000 times what you believe, but your beliefs don't mean bupkis when it comes to reality.
 
You have proof they don't have the training, just accusation. But this has been the libs for years now; it’s all about the accusation. Give it a rest.
I'm still waiting for you to provide proof that they now have training that they didn't have two weeks ago.

If you want to claim that something now exists that didn't exist previously, it's incumbent on you to prove that claim. It's not incumbent on anybody to prove otherwise
That's how proof works.

Do you want to claim a perpetual motion machine now exists, when one never did before? Go ahead. But it's up to you to prove that it exists. It's not up to the rest of the world to prove it doesn't exist.
That's how proof works.
 
WAIT, WAIT, WAIT.... HIPAA violations, RobGMN do you actually even know what a damn HIPAA violation is or what it takes to violate HIPAA?

Are they disclosing any Protected Health Information?
Who enforces HIPAA RobGMN? The Department of Health and Human services.
Is the president above HHS? Yes. The president appoints the Secretary of HHS and is a member of his cabinet.

What does this mean RobGMN? It means he isn't, they aren't violating anything. No matter how many liberal tears you cry.
There is no evidence of HIPPA violations. All that matters is there is the potential for HIPPA violations. If Robbo knew how much access I have to medical records his head would explode. No DOD clearance, but I get ~1 hour of HIPPA training per year and the occasional email, PowerPoint or short video.
 
I'm still waiting for you to provide proof that they now have training that they didn't have two weeks ago.

If you want to claim that something now exists that didn't exist previously, it's incumbent on you to prove that claim. It's not incumbent on anybody to prove otherwise
That's how proof works.

Do you want to claim a perpetual motion machine now exists, when one never did before? Go ahead. But it's up to you to prove that it exists. It's not up to the rest of the world to prove it doesn't exist.
That's how proof works.
Here's how accusations work. If you accuse somebody of misconduct, it's incumbent upon you to prove the accusation. But we know all that matters in your mind is the ability to level the accusation, not the truth behind said accusation.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,963
Views
530,532
Last reply date
Last reply from
Jimi77
Curves.jpg

ThxOne

    May 25, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top