Current events discussion

Maybe even further back than Bush Jr?

View attachment 63016
Again, if the roots of our current inflationary cycle can be tracked back to Bush Jr, what value is that chart? That chart is stupid in general. Inflation was low (partly/mainly) during the Clinton years because technology improved efficiency and the advent of global trade, furthermore Clinton was a economic conservative who worked effectively with a conservative congress. Has nothing to do with Clinton's party affiliation. Join us in reality please.
 
Perhaps a little education would help you to post the ideas you actually want to convey.

Words have meanings and it's important to know that, especially when the words are all you have to express your thoughts.
Once again this member tries to take the high road, superior knowledge and the ability to cut and paste.

Attacking language and meaning is commie 101.
 
Again, if the roots of our current inflationary cycle can be tracked back to Bush Jr, what value is that chart? That chart is stupid in general. Inflation was low (partly/mainly) during the Clinton years because technology improved efficiency and the advent of global trade, furthermore Clinton was a economic conservative who worked effectively with a conservative congress. Has nothing to do with Clinton's party affiliation. Join us in reality please.
How with that chart can you determine that we are in a "cycle" that began under Bush Jr.?

And how is the chart "stupid in general"? It merely shows the inflation rates over time, and the administration in power at the time.
Would the chart below give you a better idea of the numbers, with relation to your reference of Bush Jr.?

So, party affiliation has nothing to do with the economy. It's just a coincidence that it has been better under Democrats since 1947?
That's a whole LOT of coincidence, don't you think?



1738556330377.png

1738556353615.png

1738556388670.png

1738556414514.png

1738556440388.png
 
As I said... you IGNORE them.
The very few facts you have ever offered up here ended up proving you wrong.
And I pointed it out when you did it.
Post up some more pictures of nerves in bones, to prove your belief that bones do not have nerves in them.

Post up some more definitions of "ironic" to show you don't understand what the word means when it's pointed out you make ironic posts.

Post up more definitions of "bigotry" to claim that disliking Communism is "unreasonable" and that people who don't embrace it based on your pleas are "obstinate".

I have said before I don't care how your brain takes things. The problem is when it is explained to you how it was meant to be taken you change nothing.
"How it was MEANT to be taken". And then you cry that how DARE people presume to know what you are thinking when they read the words you post here.

So, which one is it? You WANT us to determine what you are THINKING after reading your post, or you want your post to TELL us what you are thinking?
Right. Like I said, you speak from ignorance. You have no idea why I was there or what I tested for. All you know is that I was there and what I tested for was safe. That is ALL you will ever know.
You said you determined it was "safe biologically". That means you were there to test if is was "safe biologically".
"Camp Ripley is a base that I did work and through my findings with co-workers deemed safe biologically."
You determined it "safe biologically", without actually testing it for safety?
Sounds like you scammed the government.

Again, you're ignorant.
You're the one who tried to use the word "bigot" to vilify me. Too bad it was COMMUNISM that you were trying to vilify me for disliking.
Might as well say I'm a bigot because I strongly dislike murderers.
Dummy.
You are no where near a funny person. Any humor you have attempted is as dry as your parents. Stick to inventing fraud to prosecute Trump supporters with.
You find it humorous that I want to know why you think about my penis, about me defecating, about me doing ****** things with other guys?
Not humorous at all. I really want to know why the guy who claims he is a super hetero ladies' man is so obsessed with homosexual male activity, especially with me as part of the fantasy.
Very inconsistent behavior.
 
How with that chart can you determine that we are in a "cycle" that began under Bush Jr.?

And how is the chart "stupid in general"? It merely shows the inflation rates over time, and the administration in power at the time.
Would the chart below give you a better idea of the numbers, with relation to your reference of Bush Jr.?

So, party affiliation has nothing to do with the economy. It's just a coincidence that it has been better under Democrats since 1947?
That's a whole LOT of coincidence, don't you think?



View attachment 63019
View attachment 63020
View attachment 63021
View attachment 63022
View attachment 63023
The chart itself isn't stupid. Using that chart or any other chart to demonstrate that Dem administrations are responsible for better economies is stupid. Furthermore, to claim that lower inflation = a better economy is ridiculous. Do you not remember claiming the economy was better under Biden than Trump??? But how can that be, Biden's inflation numbers are clearly worse than Trump's. Witness Schrodinger's liberal in action.
 
I'm a little confused. The Dems are in favor of higher taxes correct? Trump raises taxes (aka tariffs) and Dems are pissed, claiming the tax will be passed through to the end consumer. But if Dems raise corporate taxes, wouldn't corps just pass those taxes through to the end consumer or do businesses only pass thru tariffs? Are the effects of these taxes dependant on the party that passed them, for example nobody claimed continuing and increased tariffs that occurred under Biden were leading us to economic armageddon.

 
The very few facts you have ever offered up here ended up proving you wrong.
And I pointed it out when you did it.
Post up some more pictures of nerves in bones, to prove your belief that bones do not have nerves in them.
Whatever you say.
Post up some more definitions of "ironic" to show you don't understand what the word means when it's pointed out you make ironic posts.
Whatever you say.
Post up more definitions of "bigotry" to claim that disliking Communism is "unreasonable" and that people who don't embrace it based on your pleas are "obstinate".
Whatever you say.
"How it was MEANT to be taken". And then you cry that how DARE people presume to know what you are thinking when they read the words you post here.
Whatever you say.
So, which one is it? You WANT us to determine what you are THINKING after reading your post, or you want your post to TELL us what you are thinking?
Whatever you say.
You said you determined it was "safe biologically". That means you were there to test if is was "safe biologically".
"Camp Ripley is a base that I did work and through my findings with co-workers deemed safe biologically."
You determined it "safe biologically", without actually testing it for safety?
Sounds like you scammed the government.
Whatever you say.
You're the one who tried to use the word "bigot" to vilify me. Too bad it was COMMUNISM that you were trying to vilify me for disliking.
Might as well say I'm a bigot because I strongly dislike murderers.
Dummy.
You are the one who took an adjective negatively. It's an accurate word used to describe you. If you want to take it as a negative word you go ahead. It will add to your ignorance. So, Whatever you say.
You find it humorous that I want to know why you think about my penis, about me defecating, about me doing ****** things with other guys?
Not humorous at all. I really want to know why the guy who claims he is a super hetero ladies' man is so obsessed with homosexual male activity, especially with me as part of the fantasy.
Very inconsistent behavior.
Whatever you say.
 
The chart itself isn't stupid. Using that chart or any other chart to demonstrate that Dem administrations are responsible for better economies is stupid. Furthermore, to claim that lower inflation = a better economy is ridiculous. Do you not remember claiming the economy was better under Biden than Trump??? But how can that be, Biden's inflation numbers are clearly worse than Trump's. Witness Schrodinger's liberal in action.
Inflation is just one metric of economic status, and I think YOU brought it up in response to five separate charts of other metrics that show better economic performance under Democrats than Republicans.
It also seems to be the only factor that other people point to when discussing the economy. Maybe it's the only one they understand, or the only one that they were told to pay attention to.
You know, the people why say the ONLY thing that tells us the state of the economy is nominal prices. Apparently a whole lot of them have never had a wage increase in their lives.

So no, no "Schrodinger's liberal" in action ('still trying to figure the reference to quantum physics, but I'll get there). You've been around long enough to know that I always point to to MANY metrics of the economy when comparing performance history.
I'm confident I haver never claimed or even intimated that inflation tells the entire story, and I'd be happy to admit I did if you could find some evidence of such.

Inflation under Biden was clearly worse than under Trump. Recession, massive job loss, massive business closures, massive GDP declines, billions or maybe trillions of stock market losses, were clearly worse under Trump.
Or are we going to deny that, and just say "Not his fault." because it's a pandemic?
Hell, the right-wing nutjobs even try to blame the PANDEMIC on Democrats.

Are we basically arguing that everything bad is the Democrat's fault, and the Republicans are responsible only for all the good stuff?
 
Whatever you say.

Whatever you say.

Whatever you say.

Whatever you say.

Whatever you say.

Whatever you say.

You are the one who took an adjective negatively. It's an accurate word used to describe you. If you want to take it as a negative word you go ahead. It will add to your ignorance. So, Whatever you say.
Now you're going to try and spin it so that "bigot" is not a pejorative? AFTER you painted yourself into the corner of being a Communist sympathizer by calling me a "bigot" for being anti-Communism?

Lemme guess: I'm using the "wrong" definition of "bigot". YOUR definition means "bigot" is a complementary term.
Man, you get worse and worse with every failure.

Whatever you say.
 
There has been a weird flip flop. A lot of conservatives want us out of the Ukraine, but not too long ago the conservative movement was always united in resisting communism.
I honestly think it's more an issue how corrupt Ukraine is tbh...

if we were truly gonna make a stand against russia/communism...then we'd have been sanctioning the living fck out of the eu states that prop the russia government up buying energy from them long before the first expansion into Ukraine...no money for russia means an inability to engage in hostilities...
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,962
Views
527,340
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
Curves.jpg

ThxOne

    May 25, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top