Current events discussion

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I think Trump is one of the Lizard People and it's a well established fact they heal much faster than humans.

From the flat earth?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Guess the thread title should be Trump conspiracies

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The FBI handled the surgery? Interesting.

Did they?

Which post of yours would you like to see the proof from?

My post are not your claims.

"It" being history. The term I used that you later described as changing based on my opinion.

Now you are lying and backpedaling.

According to Ronnie Jackson (former White House Physician): "Jackson has previously said that Trump was shot in the ear creating a 2cm-wide wound, according to a memo shared with Axios."
"Based on the highly vascular nature of the ear, there is still intermittent bleeding requiring a dressing to be in place," Jackson said Saturday. "Given the broad and blunt nature of the wound itself, no sutures were required."
Still bleeding spontaneously on July 20th, healed without a trace of injury by first week of August.
Superman!

Normal human biology.

And I suppose he didn't say it was the lobe that was hit?

He sure did but he didn't tug on it you liar.

Funny how you went pretty much silent when I was gone for a while, then started posting again the moment I came back.
Seems the stalker might be you.

Usually it's women stalking me but I guess my lure is so powerful I was bound to pull a gash like you Rob.

It wasn't my claim. It was a claim posted in this thread. With a picture to prove the claim.

You are running with it so it's your claim. Prove it.

Nope. You tell us that whenever you post.

7th grade.

A missing chunk would take longer to heal than a split. Show me a split that healed without a trace in a few weeks time, then we can talk about a missing chunk healing that fast.

Being that it was neither a chunk or a split you can stop demanding proof of either.

So the FBI can tell that a bullet and not shrapnel or a belt buckle caused what you describe as a scratch on his ear? A scratch that was spontaneously bleeding as of July 20th, but healed without a trace by the first week of August?
What are the telltale signs?

Ask the ******* FBI Rob. You are spinning off again.

A 5.56 is the same a .223, run at higher pressure. So it would cause MORE damage, with other circumstances being the same. You can shoot .223 in a rifle chambered for 5.56, but it's a BAD idea to shoot the 5.56 in a rifle chambered for .223.
Try some education before you spout off about things you don't know.

They are NOT the same jackass. I also read the same shit you just plagiarized. They are not the same and do not have the same name.

From a maker of ammunition. Please, go slip on some ice and concuss yourself.

"Differences between the two are small but can have a large impact on performance, safety and weapon function.

The first difference is the higher pressure level of the 5.56 NATO cartridge which runs at approximately 58,000 psi. A 223 Remington is loaded to approximately 55,000 psi.

The second and most important difference between the two is the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a .125” longer throat. This allows approximately one more grain of powder to be loaded into a 5.56 NATO cartridge; this is what gives it higher performance than its 223 Remington cousin." - https://www.hornadyle.com/

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

***** I have been out of the house since 1:30 this afternoon.

And staring at the screen, upset that I take a pause while typing a post here.
Stalker.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Did they?

If they get to declare his medical history, they must have.

My post are not your claims.

Your posts are your claims.

Now you are lying and backpedaling.

You said I could change history.
I can't.

Normal human biology.

In which a spontaneously bleeding ear is healed without a trace of injury in a few weeks.
More like "magic".

He sure did but he didn't tug on it you liar.

Big picture. Did he touch it? Did any coverup or special effects makeup come off?

Usually it's women stalking me but I guess my lure is so powerful I was bound to pull a gash like you Rob.

Cute fantasy.

You are running with it so it's your claim. Prove it.

Prove that it was claimed here? Already did.

7th grade.

Being that it was neither a chunk or a split you can stop demanding proof of either.

So it was a scratch of indeterminate origin.

Ask the ******* FBI Rob. You are spinning off again.

Which doctor in the FBI treated him and proved that it was a bullet that scratched him?

They are NOT the same jackass. I also read the same shit you just plagiarized. They are not the same and do not have the same name.

They are the same, except for pressure (difference in powder) and cartridge neck length.
That's why the rounds CAN be interchanged between guns, but SHOULDN'T.

From a maker of ammunition. Please, go slip on some ice and concuss yourself.

"Differences between the two are small but can have a large impact on performance, safety and weapon function.

The first difference is the higher pressure level of the 5.56 NATO cartridge which runs at approximately 58,000 psi. A 223 Remington is loaded to approximately 55,000 psi.

The second and most important difference between the two is the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a .125” longer throat. This allows approximately one more grain of powder to be loaded into a 5.56 NATO cartridge; this is what gives it higher performance than its 223 Remington cousin." - https://www.hornadyle.com/

Way to repeat what I posted, genius.

It went something like this: "A 5.56 is the same a .223, run at higher pressure. So it would cause MORE damage, with other circumstances being the same. You can shoot .223 in a rifle chambered for 5.56, but it's a BAD idea to shoot the 5.56 in a rifle chambered for .223"

Look familiar?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If they get to declare his medical history, they must have.

Listen up dummy... They declared he was shot.

Your posts are your claims.

My post are post. My claims may be in my post but are not my post. Dummy.

You said I could change history.
I can't.

Not once did I say that and I am correcting you again. Your acceptance of the deed changes depending on who is doing the deed. Dummy.

In which a spontaneously bleeding ear is healed without a trace of injury in a few weeks.
More like "magic".

Do ears spontaneously start bleeding from the helix of the ear? Is this some sort of stigmata? Are you confirming your belief in God now?

Big picture. Did he touch it? Did any coverup or special effects makeup come off?

The big picture is you lie and are a liar.

Cute fantasy.

Though you have not seen me you confirm I am a cute fantasy. This is true as I am hetero so you will have to go on dreaming about me.

Prove that it was claimed here? Already did.

Cool. As long as you are ok with being wrong.

So it was a scratch of indeterminate origin.

Like I said, you won't accept ANYTHING as proof because you are that bigoted and biased. The left has thoroughly brainwashed your simple 55 I.Q. brain and this is your life.

Which doctor in the FBI treated him and proved that it was a bullet that scratched him?

Mhmmm. Dummy.

They are the same, except for pressure (difference in powder) and cartridge neck length.
That's why the rounds CAN be interchanged between guns, but SHOULDN'T.

Wrong *****, the NATO rounds case is thicker than the .223 which also contributes to the higher pressures. If they were the same they would both be called 5.56 or both would be called .223. They aren't so your argument is based on your ignorant and uneducated ego.

Way to repeat what I posted, genius.

It went something like this: "A 5.56 is the same a .223, run at higher pressure. So it would cause MORE damage, with other circumstances being the same. You can shoot .223 in a rifle chambered for 5.56, but it's a BAD idea to shoot the 5.56 in a rifle chambered for .223"

Look familiar?

Nope. Because I am right and you are stupid. Dummy.

 

[Old_Slapper]

If they get to declare his medical history, they must have.


Your posts are your claims.

You said I could change history.
I can't.


In which a spontaneously bleeding ear is healed without a trace of injury in a few weeks.
More like "magic".

Big picture. Did he touch it? Did any coverup or special effects makeup come off?

Cute fantasy.

Prove that it was claimed here? Already did.

So it was a scratch of indeterminate origin.

Which doctor in the FBI treated him and proved that it was a bullet that scratched him?


They are the same, except for pressure (difference in powder) and cartridge neck length.
That's why the rounds CAN be interchanged between guns, but SHOULDN'T.

Way to repeat what I posted, genius.

It went something like this: "A 5.56 is the same a .223, run at higher pressure. So it would cause MORE damage, with other circumstances being the same. You can shoot .223 in a rifle chambered for 5.56, but it's a BAD idea to shoot the 5.56 in a rifle chambered for .223"

Look familiar?

I am not going to go in and provide all the proof that Trump's ear was hit by a bullet. I will say that both Biden and Kamala admit it was a bullet that hit his ear. Unless you want to say they were both lying, then it must be true.

Also, I am late to the conversation about guns. I, as you might say, am a gun connoisseur. I will say that Rob is correct about the 556 and .223. The .223 chamber will not safely handle the power of the 556 NATO round. For those who still purchase .223 chambered rifles, they are not making the brightest purchase.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I am not going to go in and provide all the proof that Trump's ear was hit by a bullet. I will say that both Biden and Kamala admit it was a bullet that hit his ear. Unless you want to say they were both lying, then it must be true.

Also, I am late to the conversation about guns. I, as you might say, am a gun connoisseur. I will say that Rob is correct about the 556 and .223. The .223 chamber will not safely handle the power of the 556 NATO round. For those who still purchase .223 chambered rifles, they are not making the brightest purchase.

Chamber yes... as far as the bullets being the "same" as he said, he is wrong and even Hornady compares them as different rounds. Rob is trying to grasp on to any minute detail so he can claim he is technically right about something. Even if it wasn't the original topic.

I avoided it by going .308

 

[Old_Slapper]

The bullets are not the same. The 556 has a thicker casing wall and the projectile can be pulled out a little further to allow more powder. The ballistics of a 556 is higher than a .223. This is due to the 556 being able to be loaded with a grain higher weight of powder. As for the actual exterior of the casings and the projectile, they are both the same length and diameter.

 

[Old_Slapper]

I had both, the 556 and 308 on an AR platform, but I lost them on a boating trip. It was a sad day.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The bullets are not the same. The 556 has a thicker casing wall and the projectile can be pulled out a little further to allow more powder. The ballistics of a 556 is higher than a .223. This is due to the 556 being able to be loaded with a grain higher weight of powder. As for the actual exterior of the casings and the projectile, they are both the same length and diameter.

I am with you. I wasn't disputing these facts with Rob. I was just letting him know he was wrong when he said they are the same.

.308 is much more fun in my opinion.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Listen up dummy... They declared he was shot.

"They" declared it was his ear lobe. Even HE said it was ear lobe.

My post are post. My claims may be in my post but are not my post. Dummy.

"In" is not "in" except when "in" is "in", unless it means "passing through" because not "attached".
Or some such bullshit.

Not once did I say that and I am correcting you again. Your acceptance of the deed changes depending on who is doing the deed. Dummy.

Afraid you did, kid. Right here in your response to my question of whether you think my approval or disapproval changes history. Post #7406, if you'd like to claim I somehow altered your words.

Do ears spontaneously start bleeding from the helix of the ear? Is this some sort of stigmata? Are you confirming your belief in God now?

Nah, it was only what the physician said. Or do you now think the physician lied about the scratch, so that you can be contrary to me?
Make up your mind.
"Based on the highly vascular nature of the ear, there is still intermittent bleeding requiring a dressing to be in place," Jackson said Saturday."

The big picture is you lie and are a liar.

And yet, you've never been able to prove that claim. Not a single time.
That makes you the liar.
Ironic.

Though you have not seen me you confirm I am a cute fantasy. This is true as I am hetero so you will have to go on dreaming about me.Cool. As long as you are ok with being wrong.

You expressed more fantasy situations. I regard that as cute. Like a kid putting on a cape and pretending they can fly.

Like I said, you won't accept ANYTHING as proof because you are that bigoted and biased. The left has thoroughly brainwashed your simple 55 I.Q. brain and this is your life.

You think the stats of the economy have been faked since 1947 in order to make Trump look bad, but you'll accept a claim, without proof, that he took a bullet to the ear. You accept it because he told you what to think, and because you want him to be a hero.

Mhmmm. Dummy.

Wrong *****, the NATO rounds case is thicker than the .223 which also contributes to the higher pressures. If they were the same they would both be called 5.56 or both would be called .223. They aren't so your argument is based on your ignorant and uneducated ego.

Again, repeating what I already said.
And more: "the cartridges are identical other than powder load, bullet weight, and chamber pressure"

.223 Remington - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Oh, and the SAAMI specs on a 5.56 allow for the round to be from .221 to .224 in diameter.
.223 falls right in the middle. One could almost say an "average" diameter, huh?

Nope. Because I am right and you are stupid. Dummy.

Maybe in your simple mind, but not in any reality on this planet.
"If a 5.56×45mm NATO cartridge is loaded into a chamber intended to use .223 Remington, the bullet will be in contact with the rifling and the forcing cone is very tight. This generates a much higher pressure than .223 Remington chambers are designed for."
Guess what overpressuring a .223 rifle barrel can do:

Impressive AR Over-Pressure Event

This AR Over-Pressure event resulted in a bolt sheared in two, a split carrier, a cracked upper receiver and some other damage -- but thankfully no injury.

www.recoilweb.com

(Yes. a completely faked article to make Trump look like a liar).

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am not going to go in and provide all the proof that Trump's ear was hit by a bullet. I will say that both Biden and Kamala admit it was a bullet that hit his ear. Unless you want to say they were both lying, then it must be true.

They "admit" it? So, they are accepting the claim, not supporting it or verifying it.
That is not proof, any more than Trump denying the validity of the 2020 election is proof that he won.

Also, I am late to the conversation about guns. I, as you might say, am a gun connoisseur. I will say that Rob is correct about the 556 and .223. The .223 chamber will not safely handle the power of the 556 NATO round. For those who still purchase .223 chambered rifles, they are not making the brightest purchase.

Kaboom.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I had both, the 556 and 308 on an AR platform, but I lost them on a boating trip. It was a sad day.

It's sad how many complete gun collections have been lost on boating trips.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"They" declared it was his ear lobe. Even HE said it was ear lobe.

"In" is not "in" except when "in" is "in", unless it means "passing through" because not "attached".
Or some such bullshit.

Afraid you did, kid. Right here in your response to my question of whether you think my approval or disapproval changes history. Post #7406, if you'd like to claim I somehow altered your words.
View attachment 62436


Nah, it was only what the physician said. Or do you now think the physician lied about the scratch, so that you can be contrary to me?
Make up your mind.
"Based on the highly vascular nature of the ear, there is still intermittent bleeding requiring a dressing to be in place," Jackson said Saturday."

And yet, you've never been able to prove that claim. Not a single time.
That makes you the liar.
Ironic.



You expressed more fantasy situations. I regard that as cute. Like a kid putting on a cape and pretending they can fly.

You think the stats of the economy have been faked since 1947 in order to make Trump look bad, but you'll accept a claim, without proof, that he took a bullet to the ear. You accept it because he told you what to think, and because you want him to be a hero.


Again, repeating what I already said.
And more: "the cartridges are identical other than powder load, bullet weight, and chamber pressure"

.223 Remington - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Oh, and the SAAMI specs on a 5.56 allow for the round to be from .221 to .224 in diameter.
.223 falls right in the middle. One could almost say an "average" diameter, huh?

Maybe in your simple mind, but not in any reality on this planet.
"If a 5.56×45mm NATO cartridge is loaded into a chamber intended to use .223 Remington, the bullet will be in contact with the rifling and the forcing cone is very tight. This generates a much higher pressure than .223 Remington chambers are designed for."
Guess what overpressuring a .223 rifle barrel can do: View attachment 62437

Impressive AR Over-Pressure Event

This AR Over-Pressure event resulted in a bolt sheared in two, a split carrier, a cracked upper receiver and some other damage -- but thankfully no injury.

www.recoilweb.com

(Yes. a completely faked article to make Trump look like a liar).

Yeah I read that too. You still playing it off like you already knew that? So now we have transitioned from you proving Trump was not shot to you claiming a 5.56 and a .223 are the same round. You can claim they are the same round until your hearts content. I don't care if you love being wrong just to argue. Trump was shot in the ear by a 5.56 bullet. **** it up buttercup.