Now you got it!No, he didn't get shot.
Maybe shot AT, but most definitely not SHOT.
Why you immediately think that means there was no shooter, I'm not sure.
The Trump hotel in Vegas didn't collapse. Does that mean to you there wasn't a green beret Trump supporter that blew up a Cybertruck and himself in front of the hotel?
That would be the same logic train.
View attachment 62353
View attachment 62354
View attachment 62352
View attachment 62355
Sooooo...you were thinking about my needle stream crossing a fold, perpendicular to the strike of the underlying strata it traverses?
And you specifically wanted to describe a stream, and not a valley?
It's how intellectuals speak. I'm sorry, I will dumb it back down for you.So, what exactly is "The only point you have is that needle diaclinal." supposed to mean? Some type of nonsensical insult using consecutive adjectives, or maybe were you having a mild seizure when you typed it?
The bullet that left the shooters rifle struck/grazed Trumps ear. There is NO argument you can make that will change that from being a fact. He WAS shot.No, he didn't get shot.
Maybe shot AT, but most definitely not SHOT.
A .223 KILLED a person behind him, and another one hit his ear, but left so little damage that it healed without any evidence of any injury, in two weeks.The bullet that left the shooters rifle struck/grazed Trumps ear. There is NO argument you can make that will change that from being a fact. He WAS shot.
You claim Jan 6th was an insurrection with the only death on the grounds being a vet killed by police and yet Trump was not shot, only shot at. You are a real classy piece of shit aren't you. Convict Trump of **** on just her word, he was only shot at, 30K+ lies. You are so full of shit. Top that with you can't answer questions yet demand proof from everyone. I hope the batteries die in your carbon monoxide detectors while you sleep.
If you don't understand the difference between wound from being grazed and taking a bullet center mast...you have no business being in the same room as a firearm let alone own one...A .223 KILLED a person behind him, and another one hit his ear, but left so little damage that it healed without any evidence of any injury, in two weeks.
On a 78 year old man.
You're delusional to believe his bullshit.
You didn't say stream. You said needle diaclinal.Now you got it!
It's how intellectuals speak. I'm sorry, I will dumb it back down for you.
Your stream is thin from a narrow opening and you are dim witted enough to piss across a stream rather than in it.
Obviously, he doesn't understand it takes inches or so of flesh to destabilize a .223 bullet. There has to be enough resistance on the front of the bullet for long enough, in order to make it tumble. Thin targets are often pierced, where thicker flesh targets cause bullets to tumble and it causes a massive exit wound. Our military 5.56 is designed to tumble because hollow points were banned in war, so making a bullet tumble and explode into fragments inside of someone's body is the next best thing.If you don't understand the difference between wound from being grazed and taking a bullet center mast...you have no business being in the same room as a firearm let alone own one...
Anyone that doesn't have some basic understanding what a bullet can or will do to a person would be a totally irresponsible gun owner....Obviously, he doesn't understand it takes inches or so of flesh to destabilize a .223 bullet. There has to be enough resistance on the front of the bullet for long enough, in order to make it tumble. Thin targets are often pierced, where thicker flesh targets cause bullets to tumble and it causes a massive exit wound. Our military 5.56 is designed to tumble because hollow points were banned in war, so making a bullet tumble and explode into fragments inside of someone's body is the next best thing.