Jesus Christ... You have the definition and you can't get it right.
Verbatim is a term that is used when quoting something word for word, using exactly the same verbiage that was used originally. When quoting something verbatim there is no room for interpretation, the passage is an exact replica of the original passage. The word verbatim is used as an adverb and as an adjective. The word verbatim is taken directly from the Latin word verbatim, which means word for word."
NOWHERE DOES IT SAY "EXCEPT WHEN LEAVING OUT WORDS". This is literally telling you a quote verbatim is an exact copy of what was said. Man you are ******* stupid. Seriously, go **** off somewhere you dumb ****!
You forgot to explain how they got "passage" wrong.
I underlined it and made it bold in the following for you, in case you have a mental block that prevents you from seeing the word.
Verbatim is a term that is used when quoting something word for word, using exactly the same verbiage that was used originally. When quoting something verbatim there is no room for interpretation, the passage is an exact replica of the original passage. The word verbatim is used as an adverb and as an adjective. The word verbatim is taken directly from the Latin word verbatim, which means word for word."-https://grammarist.com/usage/verbatim-vs-paraphrase/
passage - "a usually brief portion of a written work or speech that is relevant to a point under discussion or noteworthy for content or style" -https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/passage
OK. Now explain that "passage" is not a
"brief portion" and that "brief portion" somehow means
"every single word".
Can you provide an unbiased database from a publisher that tracked biden as well?
And which is it Rob...did EVERY media outlet not comprehend the jury's decision and are all wrong or are you? It's not both...
They are verbatim quotes of Trump's words. How do you "bias" that?
If you want to see a database that tracked Biden, go find one.
You still trying to say that the media knows more about the decision than the judge does? He goofed when he wrote the decision, and chose the wrong words?
THESE words, directly from the decision:
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."
Show me where the words have been changed, or that the judge made a mistake, and didn't really mean to put them in the decision.
Show me where the decision was changed, or reversed, or overturned.
I've been waiting a while. Just Google it. Thx will explain how. He knows that Google gives you whatever answer you need, just by asking.
You mean the judges opinion? Did you actually read it? Let's just say this: if this Judge's name was THX, Rob would be raising holy cane about the games the judge tries to play with language in that opinion. And the judge is certainly welcome to his opinion, but let's be 100% clear about what happened in this civil court case.
1) Since the judge can't decide what Trump was or wasn't liable for, the JURY found Trump NOT LIABLE for ****.
2) This was a civil case, meaning that the loonie toons E Jean Carroll only had to prove a preponderance that Trump ***** her. IOW, the JURY found it's less likely that Trump ***** her.
How somebody concludes from those facts that Trump did indeed **** Mrs Loonie Toons is beyond me.
No, I mean the decision the judge handed down in the case:
CARROLL v. TRUMP (2023)
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
E. Jean CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. Donald J. TRUMP, Defendant.
22-cv-10016 (LAK)
Decided: July 19, 2023
And "opinion" does not mean a judge's beliefs or feelings, like "My opinion is that mustard is better than ketchup on a burger". It means
"a written statement by a court that explains its decision in a case"
Interesting to note:
"Generally, memorandum opinions follow ordinary rules, including the application of precedent and the rule of stare decisis. However, in many courts (for example, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York), the style of analysis in memorandum opinions is much more concise and conclusory than it would be in an opinion intended for publication."
It seems the judge DID get to decide, as it was included in the decision written for the case number noted above. I did read it. And you can read it here:
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html
Read the part where the judge specifically says that Trump ***** her. He says he did
"exactly that".
Tell me if that decision simply changes because she is "Miss Loonie Tunes" or the judge/jury/Trump's defense team were "biased" and out to get him. Tell me if the judge didn't have a right to say it, and it was shot down by a higher authority.
Spokey and Thx have failed to do it after so many requests, maybe you can help them out.
www.zerohedge.com
www.vocabulary.com
