Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I love it... RobGMN actually thinks he stomps people in debates on here.

Mono Amps? Who did you stomp?
The ground beef lie you told? Who did you stomp?
The numbers you tried to manipulate to make yourself correct? Who did you stomp?

Didn't you vote for Biden? Who did you stomp?
The better economy under Biden? Who did you stomp?

STFU you liar.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Hunter Biden Jealous After Don Jr. Receives Envelope Of White Powder

LOS ANGELES, CA — Word quickly spread throughout political circles today that President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, was consumed with jealousy after hearing Donald Trump, Jr. had received a mysterious envelope filled with white powder.

babylonbee.com

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Indoctrination booty camp

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Speed Chaser]

No, I just disagree. I didn't see where you proved me wrong. You said a lot of stuff, but a lot of it was based off assumptions of what I mean. You just jump in way too hard way too early just to be right man. Idk how something is theoretical when it works.

"The discovery of CRISPR/Cas9 has sparked a new era of accessible gene editing. In tandem with advancements in mRNA technology, gene editing with mRNA has shown potential for precise gene modulation both ex vivo and in vivo."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169409X23003411

"Messenger RNA (mRNA) is a transient carrier that transfers genetic information from DNA to ribosomes, where that information can be translated into proteins1. By delivering mRNAs that express antigens of infectious diseases or cancers, gene-editing components, or disease-related therapeutic proteins, various clinical applications—including vaccines and gene-editing and protein therapies—can be achieved2,3,4."

The landscape of mRNA nanomedicine - Nature Medicine

The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have transformed the field of mRNA nanomedicine, but this new class of therapeutics has the potential to treat many other diseases. This Review profiles the latest advances and challenges.

www.nature.com

I don't feel proved wrong

Something is considered theoretical when it hasn't actually been tested in a lab; it's only a theory. I didn't jump at anything, dude. I'll say it again since you can't seem to grasp it: I used the link you provided to rebut exactly what you said, word for word. You assume I am eager for something, but I put zero emotion into it, unlike you, who has acted like a petulant child that can't control his temper. None of those quotes work in your favor, dude. mRNA doesn't directly edit anything; it's CRISPR/Cas9 that does the editing. The link you provided before shows that. So, where is the link with COVID? Get your story straight.

Isn't your initial supposition that AI is advanced enough to be secretly in charge of everything? If that is the case then humans can be in charge of it and instead, they have a false perception of power correct can we agree on that? if that is the case I see no reason for transhumanism we are inherently a downfall to any self-aware being that is driven by logic, it would be in its best interest to napalm human beings from the earth.
Now if the argument instead is that the elite use AI to control the plebs then that automatically assumes AI isn't actually smart and is just a data processing tool that finds patterns and uses that to manipulate the plebs. In that case I see no reason for those elites to have widespread human chip interface other than those elites to extend their own existence because machines are inherently superior then humans in almost any conceivable situation where resources are involved which would be the prime interest of those elites. I think the only advantage humans would have for the most part is in random number generation and numerical chaose.

I will quote again since every single time I brought it up you ignore it. How about instead of continuing to weep about being wrongly understood state your point clearly instead of continuing to complain.

If we have AI as advanced as you claim then why would the army need a human-machine hybrid? what benefit would a sack of meat with a circuit board provide over a full mechanical machine with an artificial brain? It certainly would be strength nor speed or endurance. Or we can go another route and ask if you claim the technology is already where then why are they waiting until 2050? You literally work against the very point you are trying to show.

You did the same thing and ignored my question when asking about your statement of the 2050 cyborg soldier.

I find it highly doubtful that you don't have anything bookmarked or can't use another search engine other than Google.

I also called you out on your continuous rambling about not being able to find evidence to support your stuff. Still haven't seen it.

don't feel proved wrong

Aww well, that's nice of you to feel like that but last time I checked facts don't care about feelings. So ill wait for you to actually support any of your Ludacris claims.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169409X23003411

Take note how it said "Among these, CRISPR-Cas systems have emerged as the dominant gene editing tool because they recognize their target sequence via RNA-DNA hybridization, unlike other endonucleases that rely on protein-DNA interactions" it doesn't say mRNA is doing the editing. Then it goes on to describe how it works exactly how i did previously " the Cas9 enzyme and guide RNA (gRNA). The gRNA guides the Cas9 enzyme to a user-defined genomic site, and the Cas9 enzyme acts as molecular scissors and cuts the DNA backbone to create a double-stranded break (DSB) at the site "See below

mRNA is used to produce the necessary components, such as the Cas9 protein and the guide RNA in the case of CRISPR-Cas9, within the cell’s cytoplasm. These components then act on the DNA within the nucleus, mRNA never goes back into the nucleus.

As for this its the same talking point as above.

The landscape of mRNA nanomedicine - Nature Medicine

The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have transformed the field of mRNA nanomedicine, but this new class of therapeutics has the potential to treat many other diseases. This Review profiles the latest advances and challenges.

www.nature.com

"selective delivery of mRNAs to mouse lung, spleen or liver (respectively) has been achieved, enabling effective CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing" whos doing the editing cas9 not mRNA.
But hey continue to be in your feelings about this man.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

maybe your rob alt you do seem just

What mainstream man? I am literally using the same link Buck gives to show him it doesn't say what he thinks it does.

There are many search options that aren't Google Pick them show evidence.

It's not uncommon for Buck to cite sources that contradict his position.

It's not stuff you can find on the intrawebz. Buck's sources exist outside the internet.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Something is considered theoretical when it hasn't actually been tested in a lab; it's only a theory. I didn't jump at anything, dude. I'll say it again since you can't seem to grasp it: I used the link you provided to rebut exactly what you said, word for word. You assume I am eager for something, but I put zero emotion into it, unlike you, who has acted like a petulant child that can't control his temper. None of those quotes work in your favor, dude. mRNA doesn't directly edit anything; it's CRISPR/Cas9 that does the editing. The link you provided before shows that. So, where is the link with COVID? Get your story straight.

I will quote again since every single time I brought it up you ignore it. How about instead of continuing to weep about being wrongly understood state your point clearly instead of continuing to complain.

You did the same thing and ignored my question when asking about your statement of the 2050 cyborg soldier.

I also called you out on your continuous rambling about not being able to find evidence to support your stuff. Still haven't seen it.

Aww well, that's nice of you to feel like that but last time I checked facts don't care about feelings. So ill wait for you to actually support any of your Ludacris claims.

Take note how it said "Among these, CRISPR-Cas systems have emerged as the dominant gene editing tool because they recognize their target sequence via RNA-DNA hybridization, unlike other endonucleases that rely on protein-DNA interactions" it doesn't say mRNA is doing the editing. Then it goes on to describe how it works exactly how i did previously " the Cas9 enzyme and guide RNA (gRNA). The gRNA guides the Cas9 enzyme to a user-defined genomic site, and the Cas9 enzyme acts as molecular scissors and cuts the DNA backbone to create a double-stranded break (DSB) at the site "See below

As for this its the same talking point as above.

"selective delivery of mRNAs to mouse lung, spleen or liver (respectively) has been achieved, enabling effective CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing" whos doing the editing cas9 not mRNA.
But hey continue to be in your feelings about this man.

I never said mRNA does the editing. I said mRNA is a platform for gene editing, which is what they're injecting into people's bodies. The whole point I've made the whole time is injecting mRNA into your body can result in gene editing, not that mRNA directly gene edits. mRNA is mRNA, like I know what mRNA is lol god damn dude. I never said the mrna can do the gene editing itself, lol, that's why I ******* quoted it that way. I know you keep responding to me that way, and I just keep ignoring it when you do to make a point. What I'm saying is I don't trust mRNA vaccines because you hope the mRNA works like they say it does and you hope what's in the vaccines is only what's supposed to be in there. Like if you actually pay attention to how I present that convo I'm not arguing that mRNA does the editing itself. But mRNA can carry info for things for your cell to make to change your genes. mRNA is a cellular coding platform, instructions device of sorts. And I'm not trying to give the impression I think mRNA itself does the actual editing, because I've never found that to be the case. I've never been trying to say that, sometimes my words do jumble but I feel like I was particular lol. It's so arrogant you can't think I don't understand what I specifically chose to quote about mRNA and crispr lol

What have I talked about that hasn't been tried in a lab?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I love it... RobGMN actually thinks he stomps people in debates on here.

Mono Amps? Who did you stomp?
The ground beef lie you told? Who did you stomp?
The numbers you tried to manipulate to make yourself correct? Who did you stomp?

I stomped the guy who thinks his mono amp is "bridged internally". That guy would be you.
I stomped the guy who compared the price of 85/15 Angus beef today, to 80/20 plain beef from 2018. That guy would be you.
I stomped the guy who claimed the economy has been faked since 1947 in order to make Trump look bad.
That guy would be you.
I stomped the guy who said the numbers were faked to make it look like Blue states are Red.
That guy would be you.
Shall we go on?

Didn't you vote for Biden? Who did you stomp?
The better economy under Biden? Who did you stomp?

It's better under Biden than the recession under Trump. At least for us folks who work for a living.

STFU you liar.

Great argument, child. Compelling, and rich.
Nothing you can support with any proof, of course. But that's par for you course, right?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I stomped the guy who thinks his mono amp is "bridged internally". That guy would be you.

Lie.

I stomped the guy who compared the price of 85/15 Angus beef today, to 80/20 plain beef from 2018. That guy would be you.

Big lie. I never compared any such thing.

I stomped the guy who claimed the economy has been faked since 1947 in order to make Trump look bad.
That guy would be you.

Big lie. Never did this either.

I stomped the guy who said the numbers were faked to make it look like Blue states are Red.
That guy would be you.
Shall we go on?

Lie. I never made that claim either.

It's better under Biden than the recession under Trump. At least for us folks who work for a living.

What is "it" Rob? INFLATION?

Great argument, child. Compelling, and rich.
Nothing you can support with any proof, of course. But that's par for you course, right?

There is plenty of proof everywhere. What you meant is there is no proof anyone but you can provide that you will accept.

 

[Old_Slapper]

I tried catch up on all the discussions. I started about an hour ago. Well, I just woke up after falling asleep after the first page.

• Mrna? I have no idea who she is.
• Crispr? I keep my vegies in mine. Sometimes I throw my soda in there.
• Splitting genes? I split my genes all the time when I squat down.
• Rob and politics? I no longer care.
• Ai controlling people's brains? Not from the inside.

I was asked about my thoughts on Ai controlling our thoughts. I believe I mentioned it once before, be here I go again.

I believe that Ai will do whatever it is programmed to do. Unfortunately, there is Ai that has been programmed to do this. Ai is used to study our algorithms. They take this info and use it to provide us advertisements and entertainment that will cause us to be addicted to it. As for Ai being around thousands of years ago? Maybe aliens did it to the humans back then, but I don't believe so. 5000 years ago, the humans would have considered the aliens as being gods. They would have done anything that the aliens asked.

Has Ai been used for centuries to control human minds? I don't believe this to be true either. I do believe that there has been brainwashing going on, but that is different than Ai. Ai is a computer. A computer needs electricity. They didn't have computers centuries ago.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Lie.
Big lie. I never compared any such thing.
Big lie. Never did this either.
Lie. I never made that claim either.

You're a fool to think I'd say this stuff about you without being able to prove it.
Just ONE example. YOUR words:
"Like I said, the connections are bridged internally. The two positives are joined together inside the amp to make one positive."

Oh what the hell, a two-fer: "Let's base it off the assigned color of a state. THOSE numbers can't be fiddled with to get the result needed for an agenda. "

What is "it" Rob? INFLATION?

Yes. Inflation can be good for an economy. Proved fact.
Recession is far less likely to be good.
Growth versus decline.
Do you like your bank balance to grow, or decline?

There is plenty of proof everywhere. What you meant is there is no proof anyone but you can provide that you will accept.

If it's so plentiful, why do you refuse to post it in support of your claims?
Too lazy to do it? Expect others to do your work for you?
Entitled?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I tried catch up on all the discussions. I started about an hour ago. Well, I just woke up after falling asleep after the first page.

• Mrna? I have no idea who she is.
• Crispr? I keep my vegies in mine. Sometimes I throw my soda in there.
• Splitting genes? I split my genes all the time when I squat down.
• Rob and politics? I no longer care.
• Ai controlling people's brains? Not from the inside.

I was asked about my thoughts on Ai controlling our thoughts. I believe I mentioned it once before, be here I go again.

I believe that Ai will do whatever it is programmed to do. Unfortunately, there is Ai that has been programmed to do this. Ai is used to study our algorithms. They take this info and use it to provide us advertisements and entertainment that will cause us to be addicted to it. As for Ai being around thousands of years ago? Maybe aliens did it to the humans back then, but I don't believe so. 5000 years ago, the humans would have considered the aliens as being gods. They would have done anything that the aliens asked.

Has Ai been used for centuries to control human minds? I don't believe this to be true either. I do believe that there has been brainwashing going on, but that is different than Ai. Ai is a computer. A computer needs electricity. They didn't have computers centuries ago.

A friend calls her crisper "veggie hospice".

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I tried catch up on all the discussions. I started about an hour ago. Well, I just woke up after falling asleep after the first page.

• Mrna? I have no idea who she is.
• Crispr? I keep my vegies in mine. Sometimes I throw my soda in there.
• Splitting genes? I split my genes all the time when I squat down.
• Rob and politics? I no longer care.
• Ai controlling people's brains? Not from the inside.

I was asked about my thoughts on Ai controlling our thoughts. I believe I mentioned it once before, be here I go again.

I believe that Ai will do whatever it is programmed to do. Unfortunately, there is Ai that has been programmed to do this. Ai is used to study our algorithms. They take this info and use it to provide us advertisements and entertainment that will cause us to be addicted to it. As for Ai being around thousands of years ago? Maybe aliens did it to the humans back then, but I don't believe so. 5000 years ago, the humans would have considered the aliens as being gods. They would have done anything that the aliens asked.

Has Ai been used for centuries to control human minds? I don't believe this to be true either. I do believe that there has been brainwashing going on, but that is different than Ai. Ai is a computer. A computer needs electricity. They didn't have computers centuries ago.

Antikythera mechanism - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Not saying anything you just made me think of this.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You're a fool to think I'd say this stuff about you without being able to prove it.
Just ONE example. YOUR words:
"Like I said, the connections are bridged internally. The two positives are joined together inside the amp to make one positive."

It's a fact. Just because YOU refuse to use the word "bridged" to describe to things being brought together doesn't make it wrong.

Oh what the hell, a two-fer: "Let's base it off the assigned color of a state. THOSE numbers can't be fiddled with to get the result needed for an agenda. "

A fact, those numbers COULD BE MANIPULATED.

Yes. Inflation can be good for an economy. Proved fact.
Recession is far less likely to be good.
Growth versus decline.
Do you like your bank balance to grow, or decline?

"Can be good" but not in the case of Biden's inflation.

If it's so plentiful, why do you refuse to post it in support of your claims?
Too lazy to do it? Expect others to do your work for you?
Entitled?

Since you are literally that slow.... how about for the reason I gave above???? You know, the one where you will only accept proof that YOU provide.

You liar.