As I've said before, the evidence you seek isn't something you can just find on Google; obviously those involved in a global conspiracy aren't going to document it for us on the intrawebz. Perhaps @Buck can fill you in the back story so as to alleviate your continued confusion. You could search the old "winners only" thread for posts by Buck that mention interdimensional aliens to try and fill yourself in, but it's all very convoluted and confusing. What we're witnessing is the culmination of a thousands year old conspiracy against humanity.It's noticeable that you're dismissing the need for evidence and trying to portray this as a competition. I am surprised you didn't use an excuse this time. Yeah, you DGAF so much you keep responding after saying you won't, but sure, keep being a hypocrite. I would say let's keep the conversation focused on the facts and avoid personal remarks, but you seem incapable of doing that, acting like a child who's been told no and not being able to control your temp.![]()
![]()
Only all humans since the beginning of recorded civilization have talked about itAs I've said before, the evidence you seek isn't something you can just find on Google; obviously those involved in a global conspiracy aren't going to document it for us on the intrawebz. Perhaps @Buck can fill you in the back story so as to alleviate your continued confusion. You could search the old "winners only" thread for posts by Buck that mention interdimensional aliens to try and fill yourself in, but it's all very convoluted and confusing. What we're witnessing is the culmination of a thousands year old conspiracy against humanity.
maybe your rob alt you do seem just as stupid as himOh ok Rob......![]()
You provided nothing that actually proof your point dude and I even took the time to tell you the stuff you provided doesn't say what you think it does. Oh yea this guy's logic hey if anyone doesn't believe the stuff I say then you must be a Bill and Klaus lover sure whatever you got to tell yourself at night to feel like you have any bases for what you sayNeed for evidence for what lol? I provided and have a good bit of evidence about the plan to merge humanity with the internet and AI and modify and control the human genome. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean I didn't provide decent evidence for it man. I guess you can love Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab and follow their plan, that's your decision to make.
What mainstream man? I am literally using the same link Buck gives to show him it doesn't say what he thinks it does.Dude you're missing the point. This goes back (at least) 5,000 years. The problem is you're kinda jumping in midstream. What Buck is "warning" us about is a 5,000 year old on going conspiracy to corrupt the human race. IMHO, @Buck needs to give you a Cliff Notes version of the conspiracy and how he was made aware of the conspiracy otherwise you'll always be on the dark when it comes to his posts regarding these matters.
There are many search options that aren't Google Pick them show evidence.As I've said before, the evidence you seek isn't something you can just find on Google; obviously those involved in a global conspiracy aren't going to document it for us on the intrawebz. Perhaps @Buck can fill you in the back story so as to alleviate your continued confusion. You could search the old "winners only" thread for posts by Buck that mention interdimensional aliens to try and fill yourself in, but it's all very convoluted and confusing. What we're witnessing is the culmination of a thousands year old conspiracy against humanity.
That's the problem is you don't know what exactly I think, so how are you showing me I'm wrong? Merging humanity with ai and the internet is Gates and Schwab crowd plan. I mean Gates is a literal computer guy invested in moderna and vaccines production and distribution all over the world, and you seem to support his mRNA injection mission, and you trust him not to use mRNA to genetically modify you, which mRNA injected into the body can result in, I've already proved that. You're just trusting evil people with this forced emergency that they're not doing that, not secretly testing on people with mRNA, and that's too big of a step for me to trust. I prove what I say with genetics and internet of bodies because it's all talked about openly man.maybe your rob alt you do seem just as stupid as him
You provided nothing that actually proof your point dude and I even took the time to tell you the stuff you provided doesn't say what you think it does. Oh yea this guy's logic hey if anyone doesn't believe the stuff I say then you must be a Bill and Klaus lover sure whatever you got to tell yourself at night to feel like you have any bases for what you say
What mainstream man? I am literally using the same link Buck gives to show him it doesn't say what he thinks it does.
There are many search options that aren't Google Pick them show evidence.
That's the problem is you don't know what exactly I think, so how are you showing me I'm wrong? Merging humanity with ai and the internet is Gates and Schwab crowd plan. I mean Gates is a literal computer guy invested in moderna and vaccines production and distribution all over the world, and you seem to support his mRNA injection mission, and you trust him not to use mRNA to genetically modify you, which mRNA injected into the body can result in, I've already proved that. You're just trusting evil people with this forced emergency that they're not doing that, not secretly testing on people with mRNA, and that's too big of a step for me to trust. I prove what I say with genetics and internet of bodies because it's all talked about openly man.
"The Internet of Bodies will increase this data collection by progressively embedding more and more nano sensors or robots, that will turn your body into a quantifiable information platform that can easily be commoditized and even manipulated from afar. All this information will allow data owners to create very detailed profiles of the population which can be used to enhance surveillance and authority-defined security."
"The IoB is possible thanks to the brave new world of nanotechnology that has been developing for a while and promises to change dramatically the way we live. A lot of this research has been done by DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of the US army, with the aim of ‘improving’ the physical and mental performance of soldiers."
How do I support it? by explaining to you how it works since you don't seem to understand how it works.you seem to support his mRNA injection mission, and you trust him not to use mRNA to genetically modify you, which mRNA injected into the body can result in, I've already proved that.
The only thing you have proven is there are theoretical research papers about things we don't have the technology for nor has it barely even been lab tested.I prove what I say with genetics and internet of bodies because it's all talked about openly man.
Its convenient how you keep ignoring this, considering how it shows how stupid the idea of Ai capable of taking over the world would need humans.Isn't your initial supposition that AI is advanced enough to be secretly in charge of everything? If that is the case then humans can be in charge of it and instead, they have a false perception of power correct can we agree on that? if that is the case I see no reason for transhumanism we are inherently a downfall to any self-aware being that is driven by logic, it would be in its best interest to napalm human beings from the earth.
Now if the argument instead is that the elite use AI to control the plebs then that automatically assumes AI isn't actually smart and is just a data processing tool that finds patterns and uses that to manipulate the plebs. In that case I see no reason for those elites to have widespread human chip interface other than those elites to extend their own existence because machines are inherently superior then humans in almost any conceivable situation where resources are involved which would be the prime interest of those elites. I think the only advantage humans would have for the most part is in random number generation and numerical chaose.
I have shown evidence. You have to be a troll or something or just don't like the evidence. I'm really not trying that hard to prove my point, but yeah, I understand how mRNA works to a decent extent lol, the mechanics of it. There's nothing I've said to indicate I don't understand it, being I've linked to tons of science things talking about it, like the one where they use mRNA as gene therapy, which it's been known as foreverDude you really have to stop being a hypocrite, I am showing you are wrong by literally telling you what you are claiming those articles and links say isn't what you think it does but you seem to have a comprehension issue or you are purposely acting like you don't understand.
How do I support it? by explaining to you how it works since you don't seem to understand how it works.
The only thing you have proven is there are theoretical research papers about things we don't have the technology for nor has it barely even been lab tested.
Its convenient how you keep ignoring this, considering how it shows how stupid the idea of Ai capable of taking over the world would need humans.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop complaining about not being able to find evidence or not knowing what you think. By now, you would have had the time to show the most minimal evidence. I find it highly doubtful that you don't have anything bookmarked or can't use another search engine other than Google.
You have shown nothing. Are you actually this blind in your view, or are you just acting? How is something in the theoretical realm evidence? Or is something that is barely in the lab testing phase relevant to what you are implicating? Yeah, you aren't going hard – what a laugh, dude. Say whatever you've got to say to sleep at night. The logic gap is in you not being able to understand what is theoretical. I'll stop saying it when you stop complaining; you brought up the AI topic, so don't complain when asked for evidence. You have said a lot that is wrong, and when shown that it is wrong, you bring up something else not related to the original statement, showing how you are wrong. There is no 'I see she said anything.' I am using every link you provide to show how much you are misunderstanding it. The only person that has stated they made up their mind is you. You just get butthurt when asked for evidence because you lack it, man. It's not my job to correct a grown man's misunderstanding of research papers, but I still do because it's embarrassing how much you misunderstood it. You still ignore this:I have shown evidence. You have to be a troll or something or just don't like the evidence. I'm really not trying that hard to prove my point, but yeah, I understand how mRNA works to a decent extent lol, the mechanics of it. There's nothing I've said to indicate I don't understand it, being I've linked to tons of science things talking about it, like the one where they use mRNA as gene therapy, which it's been known as forever. I guess I shouldn't trust the scientists and what they say they're doing? Lol, there's a logic gap here.
I'm just not gonna respond like I care too hard because you are this way. You know what I do and don't know, and you're like stop complaining about it, well, stop saying it, because I haven't said anything that is wrong. This is this dumb loop shit I talked about where it turns into you said I said you said, and you're assuming way too much, and I'm not answering you like you want, because you've already made up your mind. I've made up my mind that this is coming, because scientists and the elite that control the world say it is, and I'm looking at all possible options of it unfolding. Go look into DARPA and nanotech and biosensors and human brain interfaces and it's terrifying. Not my job to be responsible for your knowledge. It doesn't matter if evil people control AI or AI controls evil people, because you won't be able to tell the difference.
Btw you should check out the US military's (army and darpa seems like) 2050 cyborg soldier plans.
If we have AI as advanced as you claim then why would the army need a human-machine hybrid? what benefit would a sack of meat with a circuit board provide over a full mechanical machine with an artificial brain? It certainly would be strength nor speed or endurance. Or we can go another route and ask if you claim the technology is already where then why are they waiting until 2050? You literally work against the very point you are trying to show.Isn't your initial supposition that AI is advanced enough to be secretly in charge of everything? If that is the case then humans can be in charge of it and instead, they have a false perception of power correct can we agree on that? if that is the case I see no reason for transhumanism we are inherently a downfall to any self-aware being that is driven by logic, it would be in its best interest to napalm human beings from the earth.
Now if the argument instead is that the elite use AI to control the plebs then that automatically assumes AI isn't actually smart and is just a data processing tool that finds patterns and uses that to manipulate the plebs. In that case I see no reason for those elites to have widespread human chip interface other than those elites to extend their own existence because machines are inherently superior then humans in almost any conceivable situation where resources are involved which would be the prime interest of those elites. I think the only advantage humans would have for the most part is in random number generation and numerical chaose.
Keep trying kid. Not even close to the same voice, if you are capable of noticing the "voice" when reading someone's writing.Speed Chaser is another RobGMN alternate account.....same shit.....joined and tried "siding" with certain members to gain trust/friendship, and then immediately starts attacking Buck the same way he does with the other accounts.....same techniques and context.....he tried the same thing with his Jimi77 account.....what a desperate loser![]()
You call ME stupid, but you can't even recognize the sardonic note in Jimi's posts?maybe your rob alt you do seem just as stupid as him
You provided nothing that actually proof your point dude and I even took the time to tell you the stuff you provided doesn't say what you think it does. Oh yea this guy's logic hey if anyone doesn't believe the stuff I say then you must be a Bill and Klaus lover sure whatever you got to tell yourself at night to feel like you have any bases for what you say
What mainstream man? I am literally using the same link Buck gives to show him it doesn't say what he thinks it does.
There are many search options that aren't Google Pick them show evidence.
No, I just disagree. I didn't see where you proved me wrong. You said a lot of stuff, but a lot of it was based off assumptions of what I mean. You just jump in way too hard way too early just to be right man. Idk how something is theoretical when it works.You have shown nothing. Are you actually this blind in your view, or are you just acting? How is something in the theoretical realm evidence? Or is something that is barely in the lab testing phase relevant to what you are implicating? Yeah, you aren't going hard – what a laugh, dude. Say whatever you've got to say to sleep at night. The logic gap is in you not being able to understand what is theoretical. I'll stop saying it when you stop complaining; you brought up the AI topic, so don't complain when asked for evidence. You have said a lot that is wrong, and when shown that it is wrong, you bring up something else not related to the original statement, showing how you are wrong. There is no 'I see she said anything.' I am using every link you provide to show how much you are misunderstanding it. The only person that has stated they made up their mind is you. You just get butthurt when asked for evidence because you lack it, man. It's not my job to correct a grown man's misunderstanding of research papers, but I still do because it's embarrassing how much you misunderstood it. You still ignore this:
If we have AI as advanced as you claim then why would the army need a human-machine hybrid? what benefit would a sack of meat with a circuit board provide over a full mechanical machine with an artificial brain? It certainly would be strength nor speed or endurance. Or we can go another route and ask if you claim the technology is already where then why are they waiting until 2050? You literally work against the very point you are trying to show.