Current events discussion

[Speed Chaser]

I don't know if you guys have posted this video on here already, but my boy said **** you to elites and liberals for 25 minutes straight, very few people with as much power as he has speak this freely

 

[Old_Slapper]

I think what we're facing from a global perspective is more akin to the 4th Reich, largely due to military-corporate/NGO technology and influence, but society has changed so much that idk how you can equally compare 100 years ago or whatever philosophy to anything now. The biggest threat is the technocratic transhumanists, the AI worshippers, IMO.

The comparison is due to the end game goal. I agree that technology is the biggest threat. The reason is, that technology can be used to speed up their goal. It will be too hard to know what is real. Take a look at the cloaking material that China just showed off. Someone could be standing in front of you and you would never know it. They would be able to sneak up on anyone and obtain highly sensitive info.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So when a person changes subjects you ignore that change. Got it.

Changing a subject doesn't change history.
Ignoring history doesn't change history.
Denying history doesn't change history.
Even repeating history doesn't change history.

I already clarified it for you but you will ignore that so you can talk shit. Got it.
Like I said, I made a point at that time then moved on. You keep talking about it so you can talk shit. Again, we get it.
You think Trump lies? Buck? Spokey? Me? You think we are telling misinformation?

Yes. Trump lies. You lie. Spokey lies. Buck lies. You all promulgate lies and misinformation.
The evidence of it is on this site.
Yes, you post misinformation. "Telling" it? That too.

Says you.

No. Says all the posts you have done it in.
Or did they all go away because you "moved on"? lol

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I don't know if you guys have posted this video on here already, but my boy said **** you to elites and liberals for 25 minutes straight, very few people with as much power as he has speak this freely

How are you able to drop the f-bomb here, yet I say something svcks, and it gets edited?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Changing a subject doesn't change history.
Ignoring history doesn't change history.
Denying history doesn't change history.
Even repeating history doesn't change history.

Nobody is trying to change history but when the conversation is progressing and you can't keep up it means you are not cut out for conversation. That does not mean go back to where you got mentally hung up and focus on that.

Yes. Trump lies. You lie. Spokey lies. Buck lies. You all promulgate lies and misinformation.
The evidence of it is on this site.
Yes, you post misinformation. "Telling" it? That too.

I couldn't help but notice that you excluded yourself from being a liar. Why is that Rob?

No. Says all the posts you have done it in.
Or did they all go away because you "moved on"? lol

How does one make the conversation go in circles? Simple, use Robs tactic of history will repeat itself... he will make sure of it.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

How are you able to drop the f-bomb here, yet I say something svcks, and it gets edited?

Fuck, Fuckity, Fuck.......its because the forum/everyone hates you

 

[Old_Slapper]

I hope these victims make out like a bandit left alone in banks vault.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...1&cvid=453400977f1b4e4fa9ca96008e905f9c&ei=26

 

[Speed Chaser]

How are you able to drop the f-bomb here, yet I say something svcks, and it gets edited?

is there something you don't cry about?

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Old_Slapper]

View attachment 56652

I read this same article.
What's really funny, you see more republicans waving and standing for the American flag, while the democrats are finding ways to discredit it. So, who's the real patriot?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I believe this to be correct. However, the biggest issue with politics is how far each news outlet leans. News is no longer fair. They will not tell you both sides of a story, but instead tell you what they want you to hear. There are a few that will speak the truth, but then get canned for it. If the news was fair and told the entire story, on both sides, then politicians wouldn't think they can get away with everything.

For the life of me, I can't remember the book that talks about how to destroy and control a nation. However, here are the talking points it had:

• Remove the middle class and push them to the lower class.
• Make the citizens reliant upon the government.
• Cause the people to trust the government and that there is no God.
• Cause animosity among the citizens.
• Have the people put more emotions in your cause.
• Have the people live in chaos.
• Have the people constantly live in fear of complete destruction.
• Have people fear their opponents only believe in moving forward to complete destruction.

I don't think it's the News organizations. I think the News may actually be symptomatic vs the cause or maybe it's a bit of both. For example, anti-vaxxers/anti-maskers will quote CDC data when it supports their narrative. However, if one points out that CDC data demonstrates the vax is effective, relatively safe, etc, anti-vaxxers claim CDC is manipulating data, etc. IOW, they're just creating their own subjective version of reality.

Going back to my Floyd Mayweather example, how many of these blue haired social justice warriors watch women's boxing, have watched a Mayweather fight, etc? Assuming you don't know much about boxing, the difference between male & female physiology, etc, then the right answer would be "I don't know." But all they need is a singular fact and that fact outweighs any and all facts that impact the issue. Again this is just a false reality constructed to support their politics.

I'm seeing this phenomenon of people being disconnected from objective facts/reality in places outside politics. My son deals with it alot at school and it's not just the other kids, but adults are doing it too.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The Marxist book is one, but there was another author who wrote a book that gave examples of countries doing this and how it worked. One country, of course, was Russia. However, all the communist countries were listed on there.

It cracks me up when dems claim not to be communists and how republicans are the real communists and socialists. At the same time, democrats vote and celebrate new laws that allows the government to control them, such as socialized medicine. Hey dems, guess what? Socialized medicine is socialism. Socialism is the start of communism. Look it up. If you notice, republicans fight for less government control.

Republicans seem to be all for communism if it's Putin. Social programs aren't the start of communism, they're just social programs. Western culture has consistently introduced social programs, yet has stood against communism for decades. The growth of social programs is just a natural byproduct of the growth of society, just like the private sector has grown with society.

 

[Old_Slapper]

Republicans seem to be all for communism if it's Putin. Social programs aren't the start of communism, they're just social programs. Western culture has consistently introduced social programs, yet has stood against communism for decades. The growth of social programs is just a natural byproduct of the growth of society, just like the private sector has grown with society.

I can't think of one republican that wishes for a communist country. Republicans are the ones telling government to stay out of their daily lives.

A social program is a program that is controlled by a single entity. which, by definition is a form socialism. Some programs are good, and some are bad. The ones that force everyone to be a part of are the bad ones. It takes away the freedom for people to choose their own path.

Communism is when everything is owned and controlled by the government. An example is socialized healthcare. It is owned and controlled by the government. The intent was for socialized health care to take place of private healthcare. However, that was too unpopular, but there is still a push to make it happen.

Socialism is a small form of communism. So, by definition, socialism is where communism begins. People didn't wake up to a communist country, one morning. It started with a piece-by-piece process.

 

[Old_Slapper]

I don't think it's the News organizations. I think the News may actually be symptomatic vs the cause or maybe it's a bit of both. For example, anti-vaxxers/anti-maskers will quote CDC data when it supports their narrative. However, if one points out that CDC data demonstrates the vax is effective, relatively safe, etc, anti-vaxxers claim CDC is manipulating data, etc. IOW, they're just creating their own subjective version of reality.

Going back to my Floyd Mayweather example, how many of these blue haired social justice warriors watch women's boxing, have watched a Mayweather fight, etc? Assuming you don't know much about boxing, the difference between male & female physiology, etc, then the right answer would be "I don't know." But all they need is a singular fact and that fact outweighs any and all facts that impact the issue. Again this is just a false reality constructed to support their politics.

I'm seeing this phenomenon of people being disconnected from objective facts/reality in places outside politics. My son deals with it alot at school and it's not just the other kids, but adults are doing it too.

Your comment on the vaccers vs anti vaccers is correct. The biggest problem is when a person is forced to do something when facts don't support the reason to do it. Countless people lost jobs because of a false narrative. That narrative being "The virus stops with the vaccine." If these people didn't get vaccinated, then you pose a great danger to everyone else, so they will now lose their job. Many people have also lost their lives because they were forced to take the vaccine. A vaccine that was not properly tested.

The NEWS organizations are absolutely responsible for helping to spread a false narrative from a politician. For example, they wouldn't tell the true story behind vaccines. They didn't share the fact that a vaccine will not prevent you from getting the virus. It will only help your body know how to fight it. By not doing so, allowed the vaccine supporters to carry on with their false information to scare people into getting vaccinated. ALL NEWS organizations have access to doctors and could get the correct info. Instead, they went on live TV and repeated how only the vaccine will stop the spread. If they would have told the truth and called out the politicians lies, then politicians would think twice before starting another lie.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I can't think of one republican that wishes for a communist country. Republicans are the ones telling government to stay out of their daily lives.

A social program is a program that is controlled by a single entity. which, by definition is a form socialism. Some programs are good, and some are bad. The ones that force everyone to be a part of are the bad ones. It takes away the freedom for people to choose their own path.

Communism is when everything is owned and controlled by the government. An example is socialized healthcare. It is owned and controlled by the government. The intent was for socialized health care to take place of private healthcare. However, that was too unpopular, but there is still a push to make it happen.

Socialism is a small form of communism. So, by definition, socialism is where communism begins. People didn't wake up to a communist country, one morning. It started with a piece-by-piece process.

Socialism is the ownership of the means of production by the whole via gov't. Communism is socialism with added layer of a militant single party gov't to prevent the (natural) return to a capitalism or an oligarchy. In practice large scale communism devolves into oligarchies.