What is?

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Wtf is that? Only an idiot misspells things ffs...

Fat fingers. Typos are a part of life.
When I use your instead of you’re, there instead they’re, puff instead of pump, feel free to point it out.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

You’re still talking about statistics, probability, correlation, causation, when you have demonstrated you don’t even know what those things mean.
Why?

That's probably because I could give a fck less demonstrating anything to you...because frankly I could give a fck less about you

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

FFS is the human body a mathematical probability!?!?!? The human body and how it reacts to vaccines, viruses, germs and so on is nothing like the probability of getting heads when you flip a coin. WOW biology is funny that way. You can't solve or predict everything with math Rob or statistics. Grow up already.

Yes. How the human body reacts to things can be figured out with stats and probability. The vast majority of human bodies react similarly, so testing on a varied but statistically small sample set can indicate how the majority of people are going to react.

Actuarial tables can tell you the probability of your death in each year of your life, with solid accuracy. They can tell you the odds a baby will be born missing fingers or toes, or with a cleft palate. The can tell you that 25% of conception ends in natural loss of the zygote or *****.
And a ton more.

But let me ask you this: If you want to keep standing there screaming at statistics and probability, claiming they are bullshit, why are you also complaining that not enough stats and probability were generated in testing before the vax was released?

How can they be bullshit in your one breath, but you say there weren’t enough of them in another breath?
Seems you’ll claim anything to support your narrative.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

That's probably because I could give a fck less demonstrating anything to you...because frankly I could give a fck less about you

And yet here you are giving plenty of a fvck, spending your time to tell me you don’t give a fvck.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

And yet here you are giving plenty of a fvck, spending your time to tell me you don’t give a fvck.

I enjoy telling people that

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No, statistically it's pretty clear this vax was pretty effective as well. How can I say that, because we have a control group that tells how the vaccinated would have dealt with Covid naturally.

Does a statistic tell you definitively what is going to happen?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

“Lies”? Oh, OK. Any idea who might be posting under your account, then? Because this sure seems like you, saying the vaccine has no efficacy AT ALL.
View attachment 51151
View attachment 51152

I don’t see any qualifiers in there to indicate ANY level of efficacy. I see words like “does not”, “No”, and “never has” when you describe the efficacy of the vaccine.

See above, Forgetful Frank.
‘Can’t wait for the backpedal or spin attempts on this one.

I knew you couldn't do it.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Yes. How the human body reacts to things can be figured out with stats and probability. The vast majority of human bodies react similarly, so testing on a varied but statistically small sample set can indicate how the majority of people are going to react.

Actuarial tables can tell you the probability of your death in each year of your life, with solid accuracy. They can tell you the odds a baby will be born missing fingers or toes, or with a cleft palate. The can tell you that 25% of conception ends in natural loss of the zygote or *****.
And a ton more.

But let me ask you this: If you want to keep standing there screaming at statistics and probability, claiming they are bullshit, why are you also complaining that not enough stats and probability were generated in testing before the vax was released?

How can they be bullshit in your one breath, but you say there weren’t enough of them in another breath?
Seems you’ll claim anything to support your narrative.

You are so ******* stupid. Just dumb. You keep on trucking and keep on thinking that your stat can predict the future and how human bodies react. Moron.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You are so ******* stupid. Just dumb. You keep on trucking and keep on thinking that your stat can predict the future and how human bodies react. Moron.

So put your money where your mouth is. Take my $1,000 bet. In escrow with your attorney.
Nut up, or shut up.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

“Lies”? Oh, OK. Any idea who might be posting under your account, then? Because this sure seems like you, saying the vaccine has no efficacy AT ALL.
View attachment 51151
View attachment 51152

I don’t see any qualifiers in there to indicate ANY level of efficacy. I see words like “does not”, “No”, and “never has” when you describe the efficacy of the vaccine.

See above, Forgetful Frank.
‘Can’t wait for the backpedal or spin attempts on this one.

Sure look like qualifiers to me.

 

[djdilliodon!]

So put your money where your mouth is. Take my $1,000 bet. In escrow with your attorney.
Nut up, or shut up.

What’s the bet again

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So put your money where your mouth is. Take my $1,000 bet. In escrow with your attorney.
Nut up, or shut up.

Why don't you take granny's money and go buy yourself a hooker.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

What’s the bet again

I am sure it has something to do with an unprovable fallacy to wit Rob can claim some kind of victory over a pointless internet argument that he MUST win.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

What’s the bet again

I'm sure it's something along who can take more of a footlong without gagging...Rob likes to guarantee he can win

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What’s the bet again

He says statistics and probability are bullshit and cannot predict future events.

I want to bet him a grand that the Earth will orbit the sun once in the next 365.25 days, based on stats and probability.

He keeps forgetting to respond to the challenge.