What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Example not exaggeration.
So you think the percentage is accurate.
Did I say anything about a hoax, China, Democrats, Trump or votes?
You’ve said that in the past. Did you change your opinions on those things?
This is the second time you are asking about a bonus.
Yes. Did you get one?
Why do you get so damn emotionally hurt when it is pointed out that humans are greedy and unethical and will use math nefariously if it makes them money. Did you invent math? Did you corner the unethical market? What's your deal???
I’m not hurt. Just pointing out the stupidity of framing math as if the only thing it is used for is “nefarious” purposes. Which you do.

Almost ANY time a statistic is used to prove your unsubstantiated opinion wrong, you immediately point out that math is only used to lie and deceive. And steadfastly refuse to accept everyday examples that show you’re wrong.
Why is that?

It’s like Republicans claiming the only legitimate election is one in which a Republican wins. If a Democrat wins, it must be fraudulent.
 
Last edited:
So you think the percentage is accurate.
Mine, no. It's an EXAMPLE!!!!
You’ve said that in the past. Did you change your opinions on those things?
I don't dwell in the past. My life is a forward movement.
Yes. Did you get one?
Did you?
I’m not hurt. Just pointing out the stupidity of framing math as if the only thing it is used for is “nefarious” purposes. Which you do.
It can be.
Almost ANY time a statistic is used to prove your unsubstantiated opinion wrong, you immediately point out that math is only used to lie and deceive. And steadfastly refuse to accept everyday examples that show you’re wrong.
Why is that?
Why is that? It isn't that. That is YOUR spin on what I post. What I post is that math can ALSO be used nefariously. You are the diickless turd who keep saying only and don't post that damn quote unless you post every word moron.
It’s like Republicans claiming the only legitimate election is one in which a Republican wins. If a Democrat wins, it must be fraudulent.
Or like the way you think everyone else is wrong unless they somehow validate everything via you.
 
Mine, no. It's an EXAMPLE!!!!

I don't dwell in the past. My life is a forward movement.
So you eliminate your opinions as you move forward. Or just forget the past like that guy in Memento?
No. We paid the bill, actually.
It can be.

Why is that? It isn't that. That is YOUR spin on what I post. What I post is that math can ALSO be used nefariously. You are the diickless turd who keep saying only and don't post that damn quote unless you post every word moron.
Except you make the claim every time a stat is used to prove your opinion wrong.
So, math is legit until it proves you wrong, the it’s a lie.
Or like the way you think everyone else is wrong unless they somehow validate everything via you.
I only think people are wrong when what they claim is contrary to fact.
I will never claim a person is wrong if they express a merely subjective opinion such as their favorite color, or favorite holiday.
I WILL claim they are wrong if they say 2+2=4
 
Part of his indictment is literally because of making statements like this.
How fvcking dumb can he really be?

IMG_0694.jpeg
 
So you eliminate your opinions as you move forward. Or just forget the past like that guy in Memento?
Why do you ask more questions to closed ended answers. I said I don't DWELL on the past. Use your dictionary.
No. We paid the bill, actually.
Good for you.
Except you make the claim every time a stat is used to prove your opinion wrong.
So, math is legit until it proves you wrong, the it’s a lie.
No I don't you are either lying now or exaggerating.
I only think people are wrong when what they claim is contrary to fact.
You think everyone is wrong until they prove themselves. This is why you are constantly demanding PROOF.
I will never claim a person is wrong if they express a merely subjective opinion such as their favorite color, or favorite holiday.
Bullshit.
I WILL claim they are wrong if they say 2+2=4
Really?
 
100% safe and effective 🐍☠️

“Beck, a former adviser to the German Minister of Health and the Swiss Parliament, analyzed publicly available Swiss and German data from scientific publications, health insurance companies and the Swiss Federal Office of Statistics (FOS).

He found that miscarriages and stillbirth rates in 2022 corresponded directly to COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women in Switzerland nine months earlier.”

“Every month that year, there were fewer births than there had been on average over the previous six years, for an overall reduction of 8.5% in the national birth rate, according to Beck’s analysis.”

“The 2022 plummet in birth rates came on the heels of a small “Corona baby boom” — a 3% spike in birth rates in 2021, that had followed the pandemic lockdown.”

“He also dismissed the hypothesis that COVID-19 infection reduced fertility. If that were the case, he said, there would not have been a 2021 spike in the birth rate following the first wave of infection in 2020, and there was no evidence of reduced fertility following the Omicron virus wave.”

“German data also indicate that the number of stillbirths was up 20% in the fourth quarter of 2021.”

“He concluded that alternative existing hypotheses can’t account for this phenomenon, and the vaccine-induced miscarriage hypothesis corresponds to both the manufacturer’s data and the relevant findings reported as the basis of the CDC’s campaign to vaccinate pregnant women.”

 
100% safe and effective 🐍☠️

“Beck, a former adviser to the German Minister of Health and the Swiss Parliament, analyzed publicly available Swiss and German data from scientific publications, health insurance companies and the Swiss Federal Office of Statistics (FOS).

He found that miscarriages and stillbirth rates in 2022 corresponded directly to COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women in Switzerland nine months earlier.”

“Every month that year, there were fewer births than there had been on average over the previous six years, for an overall reduction of 8.5% in the national birth rate, according to Beck’s analysis.”

“The 2022 plummet in birth rates came on the heels of a small “Corona baby boom” — a 3% spike in birth rates in 2021, that had followed the pandemic lockdown.”

“He also dismissed the hypothesis that COVID-19 infection reduced fertility. If that were the case, he said, there would not have been a 2021 spike in the birth rate following the first wave of infection in 2020, and there was no evidence of reduced fertility following the Omicron virus wave.”

“German data also indicate that the number of stillbirths was up 20% in the fourth quarter of 2021.”

“He concluded that alternative existing hypotheses can’t account for this phenomenon, and the vaccine-induced miscarriage hypothesis corresponds to both the manufacturer’s data and the relevant findings reported as the basis of the CDC’s campaign to vaccinate pregnant women.”

We will assume that none of these women ever had COVID, but had received the vaccine, yes?
 
Spike me harder daddy:

“New evidence suggests vaccinated individuals can transmit antibodies generated through mRNA COVID-19 vaccination to unvaccinated individuals through aerosols, according to a peer-reviewed study published in ImmunoHorizons.”

“In other words, their findings suggest aerosol transmission of antibodies can occur between COVID-19 vaccinated parents and their children—and the tendency for this transfer is directly related to the amount of nasal or oral antibodies found in those who received vaccines.”

“Mr. Hooker said the study suggests that if Ig antibodies can be transmitted person-to-person, there is a possibility the spike protein generated by COVID-19 vaccines could be transmitted as well.

“This could cause immunization of the bystanders as well as problems associated with spike protein toxicity to bloodstream components and other tissues,” he added.”

 
Spike me harder daddy:

“New evidence suggests vaccinated individuals can transmit antibodies generated through mRNA COVID-19 vaccination to unvaccinated individuals through aerosols, according to a peer-reviewed study published in ImmunoHorizons.”

“In other words, their findings suggest aerosol transmission of antibodies can occur between COVID-19 vaccinated parents and their children—and the tendency for this transfer is directly related to the amount of nasal or oral antibodies found in those who received vaccines.”

“Mr. Hooker said the study suggests that if Ig antibodies can be transmitted person-to-person, there is a possibility the spike protein generated by COVID-19 vaccines could be transmitted as well.

“This could cause immunization of the bystanders as well as problems associated with spike protein toxicity to bloodstream components and other tissues,” he added.”

Epoch Times???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
812,248
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top