"Personal info"? You think a doctor's name is "personal info"? Interesting.You seem awfully hell bent at knowing as much about people's personal info is all...I'm guessing you tapped out your local grindr at this point
So, you think a Dr's name is "personal info", then.No buddy...I don't wanna meet up with you on the down low
From the Cleveland Clinic (respectable source):
FB censored true medical information or quasi-medical mis/disinformation like ivermectin cures covid? Example?Didn’t disprove a thing I said
What kind of weird emotional baggage do you have that you’re packing up and trying to hand off to me? You don’t disprove anything, and then you just insult me without disproving anything. FB censored true medical information on behalf of the gov and probably corporations to hide as much negativity about the vaccines as possible. If FB isn’t a medical authority, then why are they acting as such? I agree that FB shouldn’t be a medical authority, but they’re being controlled as such so they could push this garbage vaccine into everyone and establish authoritarian like controls.
Lose your demeaning or leading tone, please. From the horse’s mouth:
Lose your demeaning or leading tone, please. From the horse’s mouth:
‘Meta (Facebook) CEO Mark Zuckerbergclaimed recently that the scientific "establishment" asked his platform to "censor" posts about COVID-19 that ended up being "debatable or true."’
Zuckerberg says 'establishment' asked Facebook to censor COVID misinfo that ended up true: 'Undermines trust' | Fox News
The big tech company owner said scientific experts waffling on coronavirus facts 'really undermines trust'www.foxnews.com
Oh wow, the gov censored our speech to promote their lies? Imagine my shock!
Are we talking bigger than 1.7 million people in 22 square miles?I'd hazard a guess that i grew in a bigger metro area than you...but sure I'm a bumpkin...but I'm a bumkin that don't troll for potential dates in political thread
Censorship hurts my feelings. The 1st amendment is 1st for a reason.
www.nbcnews.com
www.cbsnews.com
expose-news.com
)
www.thewrap.com
So you think privately-owned companies should not be able to make their own decisions as to what gets posted on their privately-owned websites?Censorship hurts my feelings. The 1st amendment is 1st for a reason.
The list of what all they censored is quite long; it’s so big idk what to focus on. Many people call FB out for doing this when it happens, so I’ve just seen all the stories over the years; I’m pretty sure they deleted whole FB groups where the narrative wasn’t liked. Certain groups like gov groups had lists of narratives they didn’t want people talking about or enforcing that shed any negative light on vaccines and lockdowns and all of it. They’re the ones who put heavy pressure on FB to censor, whether the information was true or not. Any gov group shouldn’t be allowed to censor free speech by forcing a corporation to do so. That’s literally tyranny by the gov. That’s antithetical to the most basic law of our nation. Mass censorship of certain true information over a long time allowed false gov propaganda to be significantly more prominent, so they made their money with their personal medical investments (like Fauci) and gained/exercised extreme violations of our rights based on fear.
Examples of MASS post removals, you know, because the gov of the US doesn’t follow the nation’s god damned constitution anymore:
Facebook removes seven million posts for sharing false information on coronavirus
Facebook said on Tuesday it removed 7 million posts in the second quarter for sharing false information about the novel coronavirus.
Mark Zuckerberg says Facebook has removed 18 million posts with COVID misinformation, but won't say how many people viewed them
Facebook has faced intense criticism for the spread of misinformation, especially regarding the coronavirus pandemic.
Example of a post that was removed that linked to a study:
Facebook admits COVID Vaccines destroy Immune System & cause new form of AIDS - The Expose
Facebook has confirmed that five months' worth of official Government data does in fact prove Covid-19 vaccination destroys the immune system leading to what can be described as a new form of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. Back in August 2022, The Expose published an exclusive in-depth...
“How dare the slaves have objections to our plan!” (Vaccine makers are like
‘Zuckerberg had said Facebook was going to push 50 million people toward COVID vaccines, yet Facebook’s own research was revealing that comments were spreading about anti-vaccine sentiments, ranging from people’s objections to conspiracy theories.’
“We can’t have this!!!”
‘Another internal memo showed that 41% of vaccine-related comments on English posts discouraged vaccination.’
‘In August, advocacy group Avaaz reported that the top 10 accounts producing health information got four times as many estimated views on Facebook as the top 10 authoritative sources.’ <-authoritative sources
Facebook Found 41% of Comments on Vax-Related Posts Discouraged Vaccination (Report)
Even established media sources became "cesspools of anti-vaccine comments," according to an internal memo obtained by The Wall Street Journal
So, there’s a lot they censored that was plainly done for evil reasons.
Section 230 prevents liability for user content posted on FB. They still censored users, aka American citizens, (despite not being liable for the content) by the guides of our own gov. It’s illegal censorship by violating our 1st amendment rights. FB worked with the gov to censor protected speech, even though FB had no legal liability for the content they censored under section 230 protections. Section 230 is there to allow for free speech on a platform, so people can say whatever without FB being sued. Facebook censored TRUE covid info, like Zuckerberg said they did, that makes FB more like a publisher, because they’re shaping their public platform for their own agenda by censoring protected speech, which goes against their section 230 protection.
And for the Covid spike protein-HIV connection:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
‘SARS CoV-2 similarly uses the host protease furin to process the spike protein before entry. It has been reported recently in a Science paper by Daly et al., 2020 that neurophilin-1 acts as a host factor interacting with the cleaved part of the spike protein [10]. Of interest HIV also uses the subtilisin-like endoprotease furin to process the envelop glycoproteins as shown by Garten et al., already in 1994 [11]. The furin active site is thus surprisingly shared with HIV, which raises some doubts whereas it might not be inserted [12]. However, other coronaviruses of natural origin also developed the furin active site [13].’ <- but sars cov2 came from the Wuhan biolab after being enhanced for gain of function.And for the Covid spike protein-HIV connection:
‘We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120…’
‘The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.’ <- Aka it’s a bioweapon gain of function mechanism
<- it’s been withdrawn due to the censorship, as there were other studies that showed this as well.Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag
We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid...www.biorxiv.org
‘Gp120 is essential for viral infection as it facilitates HIV entry into the host cell and this is its best-known and most researched role in HIV infection.’
The GP120 molecule of HIV-1 and its interaction with T cells - PubMed
The gp120 molecule of HIV-1 is a glycoprotein that is part of the outer layer of the virus. It presents itself as viral membrane spikes consisting of 3 molecules of gp120 linked together and anchored to the membrane by gp41 protein. Gp120 is essential for viral infection as it facilitates HIV...
So, what the f*ck are you talking about with conspiracy theories? Covid spike proteins have HIV parts to make covid more infectious, because it’s a gain of function bioweapon.
We both know there would be nothing to report, as Thxone is full of **** when he claims that his doctor told him there are no nerves in bones.
‘A letter from former NIH principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak confirmed that, during 2018–19, the NIH, through EcoHealth, funded WIV research that successfully grafted spike proteins onto a bat coronavirus, enabling it to bind to human ACE2 receptors in mice—the same receptor to which SARS-CoV-2 binds in humans.
www.city-journal.org
