What is the biological advantage of a man over a woman when the woman can bench press more than the man, or run faster, or drive better, throw a javelin further, hit a ball over a net more accurately?
What biological advantage does an uncoordinated 5'9" man have over a 6' woman who can dribble, pass, run, shoot?
What biological advantage do the men on the shooting team have over the women who can outshoot them?
And I'm not talking the general claims, I'm talking about comparing people of similar structure and abilities.
If both can dead lift a maximum of 325 lbs, does the male lift it "better" because he is male?
If both can do the high jump to a max of 6 feet, is the man's jump better because he is a man?
Explain the science how two of the same results are "different". Maybe this is like Thxone's "choice but not a choice" and "in but not in" theories.