I don’t believe the charges of Abuse or Obstruction were vague at all, but it would be silly to post the charges here. Instead, you can reference the actual text. They are pretty specific, and rather black-and-white:
You ask me to reply civilly, but use an example of a janitor closing a bathroom as obstructing Congress. I get the concept, but it seems like an attempt to play naive as opposed to offering a legit analogy.
A crime is the committing of a criminal act. You asked if abuse of power and obstruction of Congress are crimes. I answered in the affirmative, based on the law and how the law works.
This is not feelings it is verifiable and immutable fact.
You seem upset that I referenced Trump when you asked about abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Weird, considering those were things he was impeached for.
Yes, an impeachment proceeding absolutely DOES speak to the credibility of the allegation. If the allegation has no credibility then there would be no vote to move forward with the impeachment process.
Look at the three steps below to understand the process a little bit better, and why an impeachment speaks to credibility of allegations.
- First, the House investigates through an impeachment inquiry.
- Second, the House of Representatives must pass, by a simple majority of those present and voting, articles of impeachment, which constitute the formal allegation or allegations. Upon passage, the defendant has been "impeached".
- Third, the Senate tries the accused.
“Spiteful”? YOU are the guy who accused Biden of breaking the law when he very legally utilized the SPR, but you consider impeachment hearings for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress as “spiteful”? Wow. And you wonder why I say Trump is your lord and savior. Your feelings could BE any more biased against reality.
