Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wasn't arguing. It's nice to read someone speaking their mind and not just Rob regurgitating post other people made from the internet.
I get you weren't arguing. I was just explaining my position on facts and why I feel they are of the utmost importance. That's why you'll never see me call Rob out for asking for proof and why I will ask you for proof.
 
Gotta love Desantis. IMHO, Desantis should avoid running against Trump and shoot for VP or wait until Trump (maybe) vacates the WH in 4-8 years.

 
I get you weren't arguing. I was just explaining my position on facts and why I feel they are of the utmost importance. That's why you'll never see me call Rob out for asking for proof and why I will ask you for proof.
That's all well and good but asking for proof 100% of the time is not polite. That is like calling someone a liar everytime they post. It's ok to go look up the information after someone makes a post for one's self if they think it is not accurate. Like hey Bob, I read your post and did some research myself, did you see so and so post? It is in contradiction to what you posted. Here is a link. Oh my, thanks Bob, I was unaware that a change had occurred. I will update my post so the information is correct. Ya follow?
 
Reading and comprehension.... I ask Who are you... You then explain how. Cool. Good job glass licker.
No, you asked who am I to take a specific action. YOUR complete question: “Who the phuck are you to tell people their opinions are wrong???”

My answer was consistent and relevant the the WHOLE question, not just your snippet above.
Obviously a simple example is needed, as you don’t even seem to understand the question YOU asked.

If you simply wanted my name, why not just ask “Who are you?”? The additional words tell us you were looking for different information.

Welcome to English 101
 
No, you asked who am I to take a specific action. YOUR complete question: “Who the phuck are you to tell people their opinions are wrong???”

My answer was consistent and relevant the the WHOLE question, not just your snippet above.
Obviously a simple example is needed, as you don’t even seem to understand the question YOU asked.

If you simply wanted my name, why not just ask “Who are you?”? The additional words tell us you were looking for different information.

Welcome to English 101
It was not relevant. Are you the King of Answers? Are you the designated internet fact checker? Are you Mr. Know-It-All? Those would be prudent answers to my question you twit.
 
That's all well and good but asking for proof 100% of the time is not polite. That is like calling someone a liar everytime they post. It's ok to go look up the information after someone makes a post for one's self if they think it is not accurate. Like hey Bob, I read your post and did some research myself, did you see so and so post? It is in contradiction to what you posted. Here is a link. Oh my, thanks Bob, I was unaware that a change had occurred. I will update my post so the information is correct. Ya follow?
The captain of Team Polite getting upset that he gets called on the bullshit and lies he posts :rolleyes:

1681011884926.png

1681011932875.png

1681011966772.png


1681012044015.png

1681012082486.png
 
It was not relevant. Are you the King of Answers? Are you the designated internet fact checker? Are you Mr. Know-It-All? Those would be prudent answers to my question you twit.
Are you the whiny c.unt who constantly lies that no one will answer his questions? Did you ask a fvcking question? Did you get a fvcking answer? You sure fvcking did.
No go and post a c.unty lie that no one answers your c.unty questions.
 
Last edited:
My intent is to phuck with him to no end when I make a post and he has to chime in doing what he does. The moment he enters the conversation my intent is to respond to him by wasting his time. He knows this yet still runs his mouth. He can't help it, he is mentally weak like a dog.
Except you can't help but reply. Every. Single. Time.
Pavlovian.

Hell, you couldn't even manage to stop with the insults when I extended an olive branch saying I would stop firing back if you stopped firing first.
But since you choose attempted insults over facts, you simply couldn't stop firing.
Childish.
 
Except you can't help but reply. Every. Single. Time.
Pavlovian.

Hell, you couldn't even manage to stop with the insults when I extended an olive branch saying I would stop firing back if you stopped firing first.
But since you choose attempted insults over facts, you simply couldn't stop firing.
Childish.
Circling back around to that lie again. This has be covered twice already. You initiated the insults again, I responded, I posted the proof, move on liar. It wasn't so long ago that you should have forgotten.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,115,176
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top