Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Why would I focus on sexuality in a conversation about ****** acts and ****** orientation?
That would be a crazy thing to do. Just ridiculous.

The conversation isn't about sexuality. How about you focus on the actual topic? Nah, now THAT would be ridiculous huh?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

The conversation isn't about sexuality. How about you focus on the actual topic? Nah, now THAT would be ridiculous huh?

Homosexuality, heterosexuality, human reproduction, et al, aren’t about sexuality?

Uh oh. Is this going to be another one of your (paraphrased) “in doesn’t mean in” or “choice but not a choice” or “internally bridged mono amp” word twisting games?
I hope not. Especially given the the first two compound words INCLUDE the word “sexuality”.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Homosexuality, heterosexuality, human reproduction, et al, aren’t about sexuality?

Uh oh. Is this going to be another one of your (paraphrased) “in doesn’t mean in” or “choice but not a choice” or “internally bridged mono amp” word twisting games?
I hope not. Especially given the the first two compound words INCLUDE the word “sexuality”.

Stop getting nervous Rob. The topic for this conversation is the duality of man.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

“perversion- the operation of passing from any figure to another like the image of the former in a plane mirror;”

Yep, that tells us all we need to know about sexuality.

In a conversation about sexuality, we’ll just pretend this definition doesn’t exist, in order to help Thxone achieve his backpedal: “****** behavior or desire that is considered abnormal or unacceptable”

You're grasping at straws here buddy...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You're grasping at straws here buddy...

I thought we could just arbitrarily choose the definition we felt like applying to words used in conversation.

Or is Thx the only one allowed to do that?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Stop getting nervous Rob. The topic for this conversation is the duality of man.

Yah. Another failed backpedal. Try it on a bike without a coaster brake.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Yah. Another failed backpedal. Try it on a bike without a coaster brake.

I would simply apply pressure to the rear tire with my foot against the frame.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I thought we could just arbitrarily choose the definition we felt like applying to words used in conversation.

Or is Thx the only one allowed to do that?

You mad bro? Why are you mad? My topic, my word, my choice in definitions. You want to use your own definitions then give your own opinions on topics and not Googled crap.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The "it takes a village" has zero to do with sexuality...it's an inherited trait passed on through previous generations because it provides an advantage in evolution and species propagation for humans whether those involved are parents or not...there are plenty of species that have found success with zero parental care...so it's a species by species trait...

If you consider homosexuality purely instinct then that would lead to 2 different arguments...one that those genes/traits because they can't naturally passed on, shouldn't be...it's a dead end for our species...

The second by removing the choice in acting on our base urges...essentially means we aren't as enlightened or advanced as we pat ourselves on the back for being...either we accept that we do chose how we act on base urges (whether hetero or homosexual activities) or we're just monkeys with with extravagant toys...those base urges may not be choice to have...indulging or denying them absolutely is...

There are many factors. It could be an evolved trait much like frogs can change gender depending on conditions. Perhaps there are gay genes that kick on in response to certain stimuli. Or just something went haywire inside the womb, outside the womb or most likely a combination of many factors. And there is the occasional homosexual that will chalk it up to choice.

Clearly the option to have *** is a choice, but having *** doesn't make one homosexual or heterosexual, having *** makes one sexually active. Ie, I've always been heterosexual, but I haven't always been sexually active.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

How humans could achieve IMMORTALITY by 2030

Google engineer Ray Kurzweil thinks that advances in technology will quickly lead to age-reversing 'nanobots'. MailOnline takes a look at the ways humanity could attain eternal life.

www.dailymail.co.uk

If this truly happened it would be the ultimate disaster.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

There are many factors. It could be an evolved trait much like frogs can change gender depending on conditions. Perhaps there are gay genes that kick on in response to certain stimuli. Or just something went haywire inside the womb, outside the womb or most likely a combination of many factors. And there is the occasional homosexual that will chalk it up to choice.

Clearly the option to have *** is a choice, but having *** doesn't make one homosexual or heterosexual, having *** makes one sexually active. Ie, I've always been heterosexual, but I haven't always been sexually active.

Your views, your opinions, correct? Feels good to speak your mind huh? There is no right or wrong here. There is no need to back up what you have just said with facts or justifications. This is how you feel, yes?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I am not religious and am not speaking in, around or about anything religious. Even if we use it for pleasure that doesn't change the basic principal for ***. Anything done beyond reproduction is a perversion. Now I never said it is a bad thing I am just speaking literally and technically which Rob should have appreciated but his goal is to argue.

Whose goal is it to argue? Perversion generally has a pejorative connotation and especially when we're talking about ***. Kinda like bridged has a certain meaning when we're discussing amplifiers. Rob could have dropped the negative connotation, but I don't think it's coincidence that you chose that word either.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Whose goal is it to argue? Perversion generally has a pejorative connotation and especially when we're talking about ***. Kinda like bridged has a certain meaning when we're discussing amplifiers. Rob could have dropped the negative connotation, but I don't think it's coincidence that you chose that word either.

Generally not definitively.

When it comes to Rob I LOVE to push his buttons. Doesn't make me wrong though. When you get down to brass tacks and take what I say literally when I poke him with my mind, I am not wrong.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The word perversion literally means not the norm...in any context you wanna give a whirl in...but hey...you're the smart guy...my bad

Perversion generally has a negative connation, especially when we're discussing ***. Lets be honest, it's a loaded word.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Perversion generally has a negative connation, especially when we're discussing ***. Lets be honest, it's a loaded word.

Does it being a loaded word make a difference? Once he was told the intent of the word he chose to carry on his fit did he not?