Winners only.

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Hell yes, show me where I specifically say I bridged a mono amp.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

View attachment 47470

Yet you are still confused. You have these words quoted in front of you. None of them say I bridged a mono amp but you keep saying it does. Rob, circle the word MONO in this quote.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob, understand that I know what wont meant and what won't meant. I have for many decades to be sure. People on this website in this forum make mistakes all the time. Why is it not appropriate to have you clarify which word you used? Is it because you think yourself infallible?

If you understand the word, and it was used in a common phrase such as “are wont to do”, why did you ask if it should be a contraction of “will not”?
It sure seems you are painting the other members here as too dumb to understand my vocabulary.
Kind of rude.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If you understand the word, and it was used in a common phrase such as “are wont to do”, why did you ask if it should be a contraction of “will not”?
It sure seems you are painting the other members here as too dumb to understand my vocabulary.
Kind of rude.

For the reason I just stated. Why do you refuse to pay attention? Can you just not afford too?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Rob you may want to settle down. If you think you are so superior to everyone you talk down to then you should be smart enough to know you should match your language to those you are speaking with. Phrasing, inflection, terminology and so on. I suspect you are acting though so perhaps you should go out and mingle with real people and learn to adapt.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Yet you are still confused. You have these words quoted in front of you. None of them say I bridged a mono amp but you keep saying it does. Rob, circle the word MONO in this quote.

“bridged internally” and “internally bridged”
The ONLY time “bridged” is used in discussing an amplifier has NOTHING to do with the wiring you described.

Further, the connection of two wires directly together is not called a bridge. As YOU provided it, the definition of a bridge is a separate thing that connects two things. Sorry, but the GWB does not directly connect NY and NJ together.
Sorry, but two wires soldered together is a “splice”, not “bridged internally”.
Sorry, but no monoblock amp can or will have more than one output.
Sorry, but words are important, and you can’t arbitrarily use them in whatever fashion suits YOU. The language doesn’t work that way.

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

If you understand the word, and it was used in a common phrase such as “are wont to do”, why did you ask if it should be a contraction of “will not”?
It sure seems you are painting the other members here as too dumb to understand my vocabulary.
Kind of rude.

I admittedly didn't know the word. I can admit when I am wrong. Can you?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

“bridged internally” and “internally bridged”
The ONLY time “bridged” is used in discussing an amplifier has NOTHING to do with the wiring you described.

Further, the connection of two wires directly together is not called a bridge. As YOU provided it, the definition of a bridge is a separate thing that connects two things. Sorry, but the GWB does not directly connect NY and NJ together.
Sorry, but two wires soldered together is a “splice”, not “bridged internally”.
Sorry, but no monoblock amp can or will have more than one output.
Sorry, but words are important, and you can’t arbitrarily use them in whatever fashion suits YOU. The language doesn’t work that way.

I'm sorry you feel that way.

Question... if I refer to it that way doesn't that prove you wrong? You said nobody does it... yet here I am and I am damn sure somebody. So, you are wrong RobGMN. You are wrong.

A bridge is a connection. Period. It brings two or more things together.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

For the reason I just stated. Why do you refuse to pay attention? Can you just not afford too?

You are the protector of feelings for the people here who are too dumb to understand words that YOU understand fully?
Very nice of you.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I admittedly didn't know the word. I can admit when I am wrong. Can you?

Sure can. What I won’t do is accept “because I said so” from someone as a proof that I am wrong.

I also won’t accept it as proof they are right.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I'm sorry you feel that way.

Question... if I refer to it that way doesn't that prove you wrong? You said nobody does it... yet here I am and I am damn sure somebody. So, you are wrong RobGMN. You are wrong.

A bridge is a connection. Period. It brings two or more things together.

How much closer are the land masses known as New Jersey and New York City with the GWB there, versus without?

Refer to the definitions YOU provided, lest you make a bigger fool of yourself.

For all you folks that Thxone thinks are too dumb to understand the words I use:
“lest - with the intention of preventing (something undesirable); to avoid the risk of.”

And, I consider you a nobody. So if I’m referring to you, I can say “nobody says it that way”. If I am referring to people who have a clue about audio and electronics as “nobody”, I can say “nobody says it that way”.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You are the protector of feelings for the people here who are too dumb to understand words that YOU understand fully?
Very nice of you.

Please stop making statements with question marks at the end. Just make the damn statement.

How dumb does this look Rob? You are an idiot?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

How much closer are the land masses known as New Jersey and New York City with the GWB there, versus without?

Refer to the definitions YOU provided, lest you make a bigger fool of yourself.

For all you folks that Thxone thinks are too dumb to understand the words I use:
“lest - with the intention of preventing (something undesirable); to avoid the risk of.”

So are you switching topics or just information? Moving goalpost or just spinning things?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Proof the fix was always in. Even with a USSC dominated by "conservatives," they refuse to even hear the case. It would be one thing if they heard the case and decided against Trump, but they wouldn't even hear the case. Soros probably told them to take a pass on the case.

MSN

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Please stop making statements with question marks at the end. Just make the damn statement.

How dumb does this look Rob? You are an idiot?

We discussed the whole rhetorical question thing long ago, yet you seem again to not understand it.
For such a smart guy, you seem to not know a lot.