Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Comprehension is not your strong suit. I very clearly answered your question

Internet experts are people like you, who make claims such as “there are no nerves in bones”, or claims that millions of election votes were stolen by Biden.

I look to actual experts, like the doctors who write medical textbooks and journals, and have the hands-on experience day in and day out.

You didn't clearly answer anything. How can you answer the question when you clearly didn't know what the question was. Exactly. No go get your shine box.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

In but not part of. The pipe is a separate thing as is a nerve passing through a cavity in the bone.

Why do you now conflate “in” and “part of”?
Are you slowly trying to mold your storyline so you can eventually say “I meant all along that nerves are in bone”?

No one ever argued or discussed “a part of” regarding whether nerves are in bone or not.
A bone is not a nerve, and nerve is not bone. Nerve is in the bone.
The pipe is not wall, and the wall is not pipe. The pipe is in the wall.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

So, what is Bidens approval rating on the economy?

37%

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Why do you now conflate “in” and “part of”?
Are you slowly trying to mold your storyline so you can eventually say “I meant all along that nerves are in bone”?

No one ever argued or discussed “a part of” regarding whether nerves are in bone or not.
A bone is not a nerve, and nerve is not bone. Nerve is in the bone.
The pipe is not wall, and the wall is not pipe. The pipe is in the wall.

This has been my point the entire time. YOU are using IN and THROUGH interchangeably when they should not be if you are being literal which I am. Either way, move on.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Now for sale: Data on your mental health

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

This has been my point the entire time. YOU are using IN and THROUGH interchangeably when they should not be if you are being literal which I am. Either way, move on.

Neither I nor Jimi have EVER talked about “through” and “a part of” when discussing with you that nerves are indeed in bones.

YOU decided to try that spin after your claims (including the one “told” to you by a doctor) were proved wrong multiple times over with proof including that from anatomy textbooks, medical texts, and photographs. You even posted your own drawings that proved you wrong.

A car goes “through” the Holland Tunnel, but during the journey it is “in” the tunnel.
It doesn’t become “part of” the tunnel unless the tunnel collapses and it never gets dug out.

The nerves are considered “in” the bone even if only passing “through” it, they are “part of” the body.
The term “in” is used in the same vernacular for this discussion as it is used in common English writings and discussion. There is no special twist applied for medical terminology, there is no semantics trick bring parlayed to make you seem ignorant.
I even used it twice a sentence ago because it is so damn common.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

janet Reno was worse?

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Accessed via the internet. Internet experts is a valid title in this case. Always quick to argue the left is. Hmmm.

Yes, when you try to mischaracterize medical experts as "internet experts."

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Why do you now conflate “in” and “part of”?
Are you slowly trying to mold your storyline so you can eventually say “I meant all along that nerves are in bone”?

No one ever argued or discussed “a part of” regarding whether nerves are in bone or not.
A bone is not a nerve, and nerve is not bone. Nerve is in the bone.
The pipe is not wall, and the wall is not pipe. The pipe is in the wall.

The thing is nerves are part of the bone, numerous medical papers on the subject, the function of the nerves in the bone, etc.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Neither I nor Jimi have EVER talked about “through” and “a part of” when discussing with you that nerves are indeed in bones.

YOU decided to try that spin after your claims (including the one “told” to you by a doctor) were proved wrong multiple times over with proof including that from anatomy textbooks, medical texts, and photographs. You even posted your own drawings that proved you wrong.

A car goes “through” the Holland Tunnel, but during the journey it is “in” the tunnel.
It doesn’t become “part of” the tunnel unless the tunnel collapses and it never gets dug out.

The nerves are considered “in” the bone even if only passing “through” it, they are “part of” the body.
The term “in” is used in the same vernacular for this discussion as it is used in common English writings and discussion. There is no special twist applied for medical terminology, there is no semantics trick bring parlayed to make you seem ignorant.
I even used it twice a sentence ago because it is so damn common.

You really don't know what move on means.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Yes, when you try to mischaracterize medical experts as "internet experts."

So go to a library, university or medical professionals for your information and not Google.