ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
I am such a movie whore. I saw the second pic and right away was like I haven't seen an Indiana Jones movie for a bit. lol.
I am such a movie whore. I saw the second pic and right away was like I haven't seen an Indiana Jones movie for a bit. lol.
It's true. You can't blame his prior health condition on Jan 6th. I have been pepper sprayed 3 times. No stroke yyyyyyye eee tttt.
Sure is a lot of fluff in that LOOOOOOONG question.
Here, if I have an opinion and I tell you my opinion as such... I am so over RobGMN and I am disappointed in the way he acts on this forum. Are you then going to go find him and chant HANG ROBGMN!!!! You people keep wanting to blame any and all events on peoples opinions. There is just something inherently wrong with that way of thinking but it seems to be the norm.
Round 4.
Stop. Just stop. An average is neither number. It is an entirely new number to simplify the math. Period. It makes the math quicker to do. The bad thing about using averages is that someone will always benefit and someone will always be affected negatively by it.
Here is an example. This is just a made up example. This is not a real thing to argue. EXAMPLE:
2 people have their heart rates taken. One is 180bpm at rest and the other is 60bpm at rest. The doctor instructs the nurse to give medication to the patients if the average heart rate is over 125 or give each person $100 if they don't need the medication. The man with the 180bpm later dies of a heart attack.
I know what an average is and how to get it. Nothing I said was untrue. Stop being an arrogant diick.
Not human biology.You're a bio major, you would know that under the conditions he was experiencing his blood pressure and heart rate would have spiked, which can lead to strokes.
What action did Trump take? He wasn't in the building so what was it that he physically did?As usual another question dodged.
I didn't blame anything on opinions. Trump took action. The mob took action.
“An entirely new number”? Man, you just dig yourself deeper and deeper with each attempt.Stop. Just stop. An average is neither number. It is an entirely new number to simplify the math. Period. It makes the math quicker to do. The bad thing about using averages is that someone will always benefit and someone will always be affected negatively by it.
Here is an example. This is just a made up example. This is not a real thing to argue. EXAMPLE:
2 people have their heart rates taken. One is 180bpm at rest and the other is 60bpm at rest. The doctor instructs the nurse to give medication to the patients if the average heart rate is over 125 or give each person $100 if they don't need the medication. The man with the 180bpm later dies of a heart attack.
I know what an average is and how to get it. Nothing I said was untrue. Stop being an arrogant diick.
So we need the average of these numbers:“An entirely new number”? Man, you just dig yourself deeper and deeper with each attempt.
Math doesn’t allow you to just make up new numbers when doing equations, you dolt.
Do you REALLY think you can just arbitrarily decide 2+2=5 in order to “simplify” or be lazy, or do you just make stupid ideas like that up so you can support your narrative?
And then you create a completely ridiculous example where an average would NEVER be used in such a way, to try to prove your point. Literally asinine.
None of the above. And not pretending to be a ********* while deeply interested in the make anatomy and guy-on-guy ***.Is that it? Remember that time you tried to put people down? You should, you do it daily. I am guessing your are a very insecure person. Small Johnson Syndrome. One ball. Lactating titties?
That makes two of us then.None of the above. And not pretending to be a ********* while deeply interested in the make anatomy and guy-on-guy ***.
I also don’t pretend to have a biology degree that I use to claim knowledge of anatomy ( incorrect knowledge).
Nor do I claim to know an oil industry insider who can predict future oil prices.
Abd I don’t think I know definitions of words better than the editors of the OED, nor the CFR regarding the SPR better than the sitting POTUS.
You live in your own delusional world, kid. Anyone on this forum that’s not in complete denial can see it.
Also... correct your spelling errors. They make you look stupid.None of the above. And not pretending to be a ********* while deeply interested in the make anatomy and guy-on-guy ***.
I also don’t pretend to have a biology degree that I use to claim knowledge of anatomy ( incorrect knowledge).
Nor do I claim to know an oil industry insider who can predict future oil prices.
Abd I don’t think I know definitions of words better than the editors of the OED, nor the CFR regarding the SPR better than the sitting POTUS.
You live in your own delusional world, kid. Anyone on this forum that’s not in complete denial can see it.
By that logic, if you have 5 apples on your counter and 6 in your fridge, the total of 11 apples in your house is a “new number”? It never existed before and is not “real”?So we need the average of these numbers:
5, 6, 3, 7, 7, 8, 2, 9. What number is not here??? The average. This is a number different than the ones displayed therefore it is a NEW number... what is it? 5.875. Was it there before? Nope, so it's new.
How did I know you couldn't resist commenting on the fucking example. Damn you are prediicktable.