If you think schizoprhenia is "taught", then you are even less knowledgeable than you have portrayed yourself to be thus far.Do you think it matters how a person becomes schizophrenic? Do you care HOW they become schizophrenic or do you think they are just "born that way".
Good job avoiding the morality of grooming kids to be ****** before they are even sexually developed. A child can say no, I don't like the guns and nobody will think twice about it and the child will still be fine. Now take that same child and force them to do ****** acts. Tell me how that child will be fine after that. Tell me how that child gets their innocence back after they say no, I don't like that. You can take your little smart *** questions and shove them up your pedo supporting *** and go Google the scientific facts on how to remove them.
Funny how in the same breath you talk about "grooming" kids sexually, but then say "a child can say no" to the "grooming" they receive regarding guns.
So they have free will about accepting one grooming but not another? Interesting.
But it depicts the very epitome of how you argue: You pick and choose what works for your narrative in any given moment, with no consistency whatsoever.
Would you like more examples of how you do it? There are plenty.
