What is?

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It's like you both think the same dumb shit. Now bust a hole in your wall... is your plumbing now broken? Nope, not if it never touched the plumbing. Are your electrical wires now severed... nope, not if you never touched the wires. Not part of the wall. Just like nerves are not part of the bone material.

If you say so. So just to confirm you are also on record with plumbing, wiring and ventilation is not in my walls? What about my speakers, are the in my doors? Is my sub in its enclosure and is the enclosure in the car?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You realize that saying something often is “repetition”, yes?
If you are complaining that I say something “way too much”, then you are complaining about REPETITION.

Your complaint is pretty ironic, since my use of the term “ad hominem” always follows your pathetic, often **********, and REPETITIVE attempts to insult me.

You dislike repetition, yet practice it with fervor. Hypocrite.

Again... you are stupid. If I wanted to say I dislike repetition then that's what I would say. I pointed out a phrase you use way to often in an attempt to sound intelligent. YOU failed. You try your damnedest to spin everything just so you can talk shit to someone. Count your blessings internet troll. I promise you, your internet anonymity is the reason you can still chew food.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If you say so. So just to confirm you are also on record with plumbing, wiring and ventilation is not in my walls? What about my speakers, are the in my doors? Is my sub in its enclosure and is the enclosure in the car?

In, not part of. Why, why do you people do this shit. Is it just so you can be cocky? Be an *******? A smart ***?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

It's like you both think the same dumb shit. Now bust a hole in your wall... is your plumbing now broken? Nope, not if it never touched the plumbing. Are your electrical wires now severed... nope, not if you never touched the wires. Not part of the wall. Just like nerves are not part of the bone material.

Hmmm, so that Coca Cola isn’t IN the can, the can just SURROUNDS it.
The blood isn’t IN our veins, it just passes THROUGH them.
The stereo system isn’t IN your car, your car just is a placeholder.

So I guess if the ends of the Lincoln Tunnel suddenly got blocked, there wouldn’t be any people or any cars IN the tunnel.
Hey what a great deal for miners! They are not trapped IN the mine when it collapses.
Lifesaving!

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Hmmm, so that Coca Cola isn’t IN the can, the can just SURROUNDS it.
The blood isn’t IN our veins, it just passes THROUGH them.
The stereo system isn’t IN your car, your car just is a placeholder.

So I guess if the ends of the Lincoln Tunnel suddenly got blocked, there wouldn’t be any people or any cars IN the tunnel.
Hey what a great deal for miners! They are not trapped IN the mine when it collapses.
Lifesaving!

In, not part of. So how many times do I have to say it before you stop being a dick eating *******?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

In, not part of. Why, why do you people do this shit. Is it just so you can be cocky? Be an *******? A smart ***?

For me, as an English major, I can be picky about language. People often try to distort the meaning of words to fit some narrative. The most famous example that comes to mind is: “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.

I'm pretty sure if I asked 100 people if there are pipes "in" my walls, I'd get very close to 100% yes because "in" has a standard definition that we all accept and use. I'm sure if asked 100 biology majors or doctors about nerves in my bones, again I'd get pretty close to 100%.

I've seen the pictures of the nervous system within the bones. I've read and watched documentaries on how the skeleton's nervous system literally allows the skeletal system to adapt to it's environment. OTOH, other than yourself, I cannot find a single source that says there are no nerves in your bones and its all based on this convoluted definition of "in" where "in" no longer means "in."

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

In, not part of. So how many times do I have to say it before you stop being a dick eating *******?

You did say in. But assuming what you meant was "nerves are not part" of the skeletal system (bones), there is ample evidence to the contrary. Nerves are clearly part of the skeletal system, controlling things such as pain reception, red cell production, repair, growth and adapting to it's environment.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

In, not part of. So how many times do I have to say it before you stop being a dick eating *******?

You’re changing your story, now.
I quoted you multiple times claiming bones do not have nerves IN them, and you claimed it after I specifically said bones do have nerves IN them.

You have attempted the impossible backpedal. You created far too much evidence to deny it, and denying it just makes you look like a complete liar and/or nut job.

You hate repetition because it shows you are a liar.
YOUR WORDS: "When you break a bone the pain you feel is not the broken bone because bones have no nerves."
"Not a reversal at all and when the bones heal those passages are closed off. The bones themsselves have no nerves."
"I ask the doctor if it was going to hurt he informed me that any pain I would feel would be minor from the puncture wounds in the skin and that I would not feel the pins coming out of the bone as there are no nerves in the bones."
This one is a real beauty: " I will concede that STUDIES are leaning to nerves in bones. Mostly in animal but in some human medical studies."

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

He's always mocked/attacked reporters. Does the report in question flail about like Trump did?

You tell me?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

He's always mocked/attacked reporters. Does the report in question flail about like Trump did?

Please show me where he has mocked another reporter like this? Just one. Please change my mind that this wasn't disgusting.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘Why is Big Pharma investigating their own covid vaccines for myocarditis side effects if the vaccines were already supposedly tested and proven safe and effective?

Both Pfizer and Moderna have announced that they will be undertaking studies to determine the longer term risks of Myocarditis (an inflammatory condition of the heart which can lead to death) for people who have been injected with the mRNA based covid vaccines. The decision comes after the release of multiple medical studies which show a correlation and causation between the vaccines and an exponential increase in heart problems, specifically among men 40 years old and younger. Only a year ago the link between covid vaccinations and myocarditis was widely denied.

Studies also show that myocarditis risk increases with the number of boosters a person has taken.’

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

‘Why is Big Pharma investigating their own covid vaccines for myocarditis side effects if the vaccines were already supposedly tested and proven safe and effective?

Both Pfizer and Moderna have announced that they will be undertaking studies to determine the longer term risks of Myocarditis (an inflammatory condition of the heart which can lead to death) for people who have been injected with the mRNA based covid vaccines. The decision comes after the release of multiple medical studies which show a correlation and causation between the vaccines and an exponential increase in heart problems, specifically among men 40 years old and younger. Only a year ago the link between covid vaccinations and myocarditis was widely denied.

Studies also show that myocarditis risk increases with the number of boosters a person has taken.’

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

LOL, I came here to post the same news. I guess some people are unaware that numerous "safe and effective" drugs do have side effects and even occasionally kill people. I guess while some of us accepted that as common knowledge (watch any drug commercial on TV), it is surprising to a certain subset of people.

In the case of the Moderna vaccine your chances of getting myo/pericarditis is .00035%. The powers that be, researchers, FDA, CDC, the law firms who will have to litigate the cases, et al have some reason concluded that .00035% risk is worth the reward.

BTW, the link between the vax and myocarditis was never denied, as a matter of fact quiet the opposite, it was established right out of the gate - I'd say within weeks. Additionally, myo/pericarditis are well known adverse effects of any vaccine or viral infection.

In all, more than 2.2 million second Pfizer doses were given and more than 870,000 Moderna doses. Within 21 days of the second dose, there were a total of 59 myocarditis cases (21 Pfizer and 31 Moderna) and 41 pericarditis cases (21 Pfizer and 20 Moderna). Researchers also looked at rates per million doses and the rate was 35.6 cases per million for Moderna and 12.6 per million for Pfizer-;an almost threefold increase after Moderna shots vs. Pfizer. Comparatively, rates of myocarditis in the general population in 2018, were 2.01 per million in people under age 40 and 2.2 per million in people over age 40.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/2...een-Pfizer-and-Moderna-COVID-19-vaccines.aspx

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Please show me where he has mocked another reporter like this? Just one. Please change my mind that this wasn't disgusting.

I'm not here to change your mind. I'm just saying the evidence isn't that convincing. Maybe he is making fun of the guy, I certainly wouldn't put it past him. Maybe he's just flailing about. Do I really care one way or the other, not really. This pales in comparison to the "big lie."

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

For me, as an English major, I can be picky about language. People often try to distort the meaning of words to fit some narrative. The most famous example that comes to mind is: “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.

I'm pretty sure if I asked 100 people if there are pipes "in" my walls, I'd get very close to 100% yes because "in" has a standard definition that we all accept and use. I'm sure if asked 100 biology majors or doctors about nerves in my bones, again I'd get pretty close to 100%.

I've seen the pictures of the nervous system within the bones. I've read and watched documentaries on how the skeleton's nervous system literally allows the skeletal system to adapt to it's environment. OTOH, other than yourself, I cannot find a single source that says there are no nerves in your bones and its all based on this convoluted definition of "in" where "in" no longer means "in."

Sure and then I explained it so there should be no confusion and both of you continued to be smart *****. At that point both of you should move on because you are not having a conversation, you are being dicks to be dicks.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Please show me where he has mocked another reporter like this? Just one. Please change my mind that this wasn't disgusting.

You need to stop asking for that proof since I posted a video showing it to you. He HAS done this to other reporters. Stop ignoring shit just so you can keep typing.