Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You're in such a triggered hurry to dive into the ad hominem, you forget the bullshit that you spew here. I'll refresh your memory:
View attachment 44325

YOU are the one talking about diesel going away, and you SPECIFICALLY mention how EV charging stations will go dark (still trying to support your claims that EV simply is not feasible, I presume).
You said "without diesel everything with stop" (assuming your incredibly literate self meant "will"), and included "no charging stations for those cute electric cars".

Why exactly can't electricity be generated without diesel? It's YOUR theory. Own it and explain it.
And tell us about those diesel powered high speed trains. The 100,000 diesel powered Amazon Rivan delivery vehicles, the Freightliner diesel eCascadia trucks.

It's funny how you claimed EV was not feasible, but are now discussing the sudden loss of diesel, which would take an already feasible concept of EV, and make it a NECESSITY.

I love how you destroy your own arguments with your own arguments. It's fekkin entertaining at times.
See, you refuse to read post. What are the majority of charging stations powered by in the US?
When did I claim EV was not feasible and show the context.

I love how you ask so many questions then at the end, like an arrogant dick sucker, you claim I destroyed my own argument. Really, don't I have to respond for it to be an argument or will you continue to respond for me?

You know, you are dramatic like a woman.
 
"What's the definition of insanity???"
Countering Thxone's feelings and beliefs with facts and proofs, hoping that he will see the error of his ways?
Show me proof Rob that right now if diesel was no more that we have enough renewables to cover the gap and keep America going even up to the level we are at right now. Do we have enough renewables in place Rob.

All that talk and you destroy your own argument with your liberal arrogance and tiny penis.
 
That list barely touches on what he doesn't understand, but I think you may be right. All the rust holes in his Ford Escape may have been letting the fumes get in.

Christ, he's STILL confused that the news article was NEVER talking about "part of a person" being vaccinated. Even after it was explained HOW many times that they said over 99% of a LARGE POPULATION.

Maybe he's one of those people that once he latches onto a thought he simply cannot let it go, and thus he will argue an incorrect theory until he's blue in the face and pounding epithets on his keyboard while punching his own head with closed fists.
Yup just like you far left libertards, I'm latching on. Hey, tell us how Jan 6th was a coup and show us 21,000 documented lies and show us all those BLM peaceful protest that didn't destroy anything.
 
The Dems just can't help themselves. Of all elections cycles to get caught cheating during....


 
Bro, he doesn't believe a **** happened unless he witnesses it or sees it on video. He doesn't know what average means. He doesn't understand the most basic part of economics which is supply and demand. I think his car had a carbon monoxide leak when he is/was delivering all of those pizzas.
Shouldn't YOU be getting booted/censored/canceled for spreading misinformation?
 
See, you refuse to read post. What are the majority of charging stations powered by in the US?
When did I claim EV was not feasible and show the context.

I love how you ask so many questions then at the end, like an arrogant dick sucker, you claim I destroyed my own argument. Really, don't I have to respond for it to be an argument or will you continue to respond for me?

You know, you are dramatic like a woman.
Triggered boy is out of his vodka coma, I see.

The very vast majority of charging stations are powered off the electrical grid, which is powered only one half of a percent by petroleum. I’ll repeat: ONE HALF OF A PERCENT OR LESS. That means 99.5% of electricity is NOT derived from petroleum.

Pretty much every post you made about EV is describing how they are not feasible. In this claim, you used a false set of “facts” to push your obsession with diesel: “2 hours every 130 miles? Yeah, you are right, I won't be bothered with that. Let's waste vacation time charging a car, in the sun, or rain, or snow. That's 13 hours of vacation time wasted 26 hours over all charging a car when I could just drive a clean burning diesel.”

Two hours charge to drive 130 miles? You must have an EV with NiCd batteries.
This is 2022, kid. LITHIUM.

Charge at home and drive 400 miles. Take a piss and good break and charge for 30 minutes for 200 more miles of driving.
600 miles in a day.
 
Last edited:
That list barely touches on what he doesn't understand...
It's funny you think people don't understand things because you are quick with a Google search. Your whole life is assuming you know more than other people. I don't think you know shit. I think you are stupid. Your whole knowledge base is what you have accumulated from google searches and the thousands of trolling arguments you have been in on so many websites. You eventually learn the right answers through being proven wrong then move on to the next internet forum carrying that lesson learned with you. Rinse and repeat and here you are.
 
Triggered boy is out of his vodka coma, I see.

The very vast majority of charging stations are powered off the electrical grid, which is powered only one half of a percent by petroleum. I’ll repeat: ONE HALF OF A PERCENT OR LESS. That means 99.5% of electricity is NOT derived from petroleum.

Pretty much every post you made about EV is describing how they are not feasible. In this claim, you used a false set of “facts” to push your obsession with diesel: “2 hours every 130 miles? Yeah, you are right, I won't be bothered with that. Let's waste vacation time charging a car, in the sun, or rain, or snow. That's 13 hours of vacation time wasted 26 hours over all charging a car when I could just drive a clean burning diesel.”

Two hours charge to drive 130 miles? You must have an EV with NiCd batteries.
Thus is 2022, kid. LITHIUM.

Charge at home and drive 400 miles. Take a piss and good break and charge for 30 minutes for 200 more miles of driving.
600 miles in a day.
Background
Electric vehicle (EV) owners are often under the impression that they are “saving the earth” by using electricity instead of gas to power their car. What many do not realize, however, is that the source providing electricity to their charging station is most likely a fossil fuel. This is because a majority of the United States’ energy still comes from fossil fuels. Only 11% of the US’s energy comes from renewable resources, while the other 89% is from fossil fuels including petroleum, natural gas, nuclear electric power, and coal ( EIA ). As more cars continue to become electrified, it is important that we ask exactly how “eco-friendly” these vehicles are. Gas powered cars are responsible for releasing greenhouse gases at the back end- this refers to the oil being burned when powering individual cars. This “back-end” pollution produces black carbon which accounts for about 35% of global emissions. On the other hand, electric powered cars that receive their electricity from fossil fuels, are responsible for releasing greenhouse gases at the “front end”- this refers to fossil fuel combustion happening at the power plant. This front end pollution produces SO2, which accounts for about 73% of global emissions, and CO2, which accounts for about 25% of global emissions ( Requia ). The purpose of this project is to determine whether states are making true sustainable living more accessible. “True” meaning that EV owners can charge their cars using renewable energy and not just fossil fuels.
 
Background
Electric vehicle (EV) owners are often under the impression that they are “saving the earth” by using electricity instead of gas to power their car. What many do not realize, however, is that the source providing electricity to their charging station is most likely a fossil fuel. This is because a majority of the United States’ energy still comes from fossil fuels. Only 11% of the US’s energy comes from renewable resources, while the other 89% is from fossil fuels including petroleum, natural gas, nuclear electric power, and coal ( EIA ). As more cars continue to become electrified, it is important that we ask exactly how “eco-friendly” these vehicles are. Gas powered cars are responsible for releasing greenhouse gases at the back end- this refers to the oil being burned when powering individual cars. This “back-end” pollution produces black carbon which accounts for about 35% of global emissions. On the other hand, electric powered cars that receive their electricity from fossil fuels, are responsible for releasing greenhouse gases at the “front end”- this refers to fossil fuel combustion happening at the power plant. This front end pollution produces SO2, which accounts for about 73% of global emissions, and CO2, which accounts for about 25% of global emissions ( Requia ). The purpose of this project is to determine whether states are making true sustainable living more accessible. “True” meaning that EV owners can charge their cars using renewable energy and not just fossil fuels.
You didn’t put anything relevant here to your false beliefs that the grid is powered by diesel.
But, it sure looks like another attempt to “prove” electric vehicles aren’t feasible.

ONE HALF IF ONE PERCENT OF ELECTRICITY IS DERIVED FROM PETROLEUM.

Tell us again how electric cars cannot be charged without diesel.
 
It's funny you think people don't understand things because you are quick with a Google search. Your whole life is assuming you know more than other people. I don't think you know shit. I think you are stupid. Your whole knowledge base is what you have accumulated from google searches and the thousands of trolling arguments you have been in on so many websites. You eventually learn the right answers through being proven wrong then move on to the next internet forum carrying that lesson learned with you. Rinse and repeat and here you are.
Where you fall through the cracks is in not learning when you read.

If I am not sure of my knowledge, I verify.
If I don’t know something, I research and find out.
In both situations, I learn and retain.

You have literally had stuff explained to you in the simplest terms possible, then you just say “go eat diick” and continue to hang onto your incorrect beliefs, even arguing ad infinitum that you are not wrong.

BIG difference, kid.
 
Last edited:
You didn’t put anything relevant here to your false beliefs that the grid is powered by diesel.
But, it sure looks like another attempt to “prove” electric vehicles aren’t feasible.

ONE HALF IF ONE PERCENT OF ELECTRICITY IS DERIVED FROM PETROLEUM.

Tell us again how electric cars cannot be charged without diesel.
So then the other 80+% is from fossil fuels. NOT RENEWABLES. I never said the power grid is powered by diesel. Typical Rob.
 
Where you fall through the cracks is in not learning when you read.

If I am not sure of my knowledge, I verify.
If I don’t know something, I research and find out.
In both situations, I learn and retain.

You have literally had stuff explained to you in the simplest terms possible, then you just say “go eat ducks” and continue to hang onto your incorrect beliefs.

BIG difference, kid.
I haven't had Duck in a while.

I am glad you didn't deny what you do when you move from forum to forum. Tell me, how long did it take for them to get fed up with you on BladeForums?
 
So then the other 80+% is from fossil fuels. NOT RENEWABLES. I never said the power grid is powered by diesel. Typical Rob.
Who was the guy who claimed EVs would not be able to be charged without diesel that runs the charging stations? Here, I'll help jog your vodka-addled memory a bit:
Because this country runs on Diesel and if there is none, everything with stop. No trucks to deliver, no boats to transport, no charging stations for those cute electric cars, it will stop and stop quickly.
Tell us again why there will be no electrical charging stations without diesel, since petroleum only accounts for 1/2% of electricity production. You failed to explain the last time I asked.

Also. tell us how 12% of electricity coming from renewable sources is inconsequential, when you think the 1/2% that come from diesel will shit down the grid if it's lost.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,118,518
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top