What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
100% safe and effective:





Ah, the old you can't disprove a negative strategy. What about all the all the unexplained heart attacks, strokes, etc that happened prior to covid or the vax. Since according to the anti-vaxxers, the vax didn't stop covid, then how do we know these negative events weren't caused by covid???
 
Nobody cares about your biased studies.
Then show us an unbiased and peer-reviewed study that says the vaccine has been a failure.

Not your personal “because Thxone said so” analysis, but actual studies by actual experts (not people like you who think simply having a 2-year degree makes them an “expert”).

Go ahead. Toss some links up.
We can wait.
 
Ah, the old you can't disprove a negative strategy. What about all the all the unexplained heart attacks, strokes, etc that happened prior to covid or the vax. Since according to the anti-vaxxers, the vax didn't stop covid, then how do we know these negative events weren't caused by covid???

Well, you’d be hearing a lot more doctors’ opposing opinions if there wasn’t mass censorship campaigns being brought down on us via the UN and White House through news media and big tech. That’s the problem with living in an authoritarian state is that non-state sponsored opinions by medical professionals are censored, and most people only know what they hear from passive means of absorbing information.

The vaccine hasn’t stopped covid and never would, but they lied about that. Masks, lockdowns, social distancing, isolating yourself, yeah, none of that bullshit worked, because it was never about preventing disease. Covid is with us forever, like I’ve said many times.

Calling everyone who doesn’t like an experimental artificial genetic shot an anti-vaxxer is kind of radical. It’s more like people who don’t like the covid shots don’t like to be walking experiments for corporations with horrible histories of fraud and harming people.
 
Last edited:
How is an 80% kill rate in “humanized” mice less deadly?
80% is less than 100%

For example: You have two groups of mice, 100 in each group. You give group A the original strain, and group B the “Boston University” strain.

100% of group A dies. 100 mice dead.
80% of group B dies. 80 mice dead. 20 live. This is a decrease.

80 mice is less than 100. This means the Boston strain is less deadly.
“Gain” is synonymous with “increase” or “add” or “more”.
You can’t have “gain” in virulence by making something weaker.

Less is not more.

Get it?
 
80% is less than 100%

For example: You have two groups of mice, 100 in each group. You give group A the original strain, and group B the “Boston University” strain.

100% of group A dies. 100 mice dead.
80% of group B dies. 80 mice dead. 20 live. This is a decrease.

80 mice is less than 100. This means the Boston strain is less deadly.
“Gain” is synonymous with “increase” or “add” or “more”.
You can’t have “gain” in virulence by making something weaker.

Less is not more.

Get it?

You’re such a kunt. Get it?

The original strain killed all the mice? I never saw that part; do you have proof of that?
 
Suspicious how they want to force vaccinate kids for a disease they have such little of chance of having severe disease from:




This is disturbing, because the shots are still experimental and are only approved by using emergency authorization powers. Wtf is going on? Howwww is this even seen as a possibility?

‘A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advisory committee is set to vote on Thursday over whether to add the Covid-19 vaccine to the recommended schedule of vaccines for children.’

‘"Thursday, CDC's independent advisory committee (ACIP) will vote on an updated childhood immunization schedule. States establish vaccine requirements for school children, not [the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] or CDC," the agency wrote in response to a segment by Fox News' Tucker Carlson, who reported that the updated childhood vaccine schedule would soon mean that kids "will not be able to attend school without taking the COVID shot."’

 
Well, you’d be hearing a lot more doctors’ opposing opinions if there wasn’t mass censorship campaigns being brought down on us via the UN and White House through news media and big tech. That’s the problem with living in an authoritarian state is that non-state sponsored opinions by medical professionals are censored, and most people only know what they hear from passive means of absorbing information.

The vaccine hasn’t stopped covid and never would, but they lied about that. Masks, lockdowns, social distancing, isolating yourself, yeah, none of that bullshit worked, because it was never about preventing disease. Covid is with us forever, like I’ve said many times.

Calling everyone who doesn’t like an experimental artificial genetic shot an anti-vaxxer is kind of radical. It’s more like people who don’t like the covid shots don’t like to be walking experiments for corporations with horrible histories of fraud and harming people.

Big Pharma certainly has broken rules, but let's keep mind that billions of people rely on them for life saving/improving drugs, vaccines, etc. Anybody who feels these companies cannot be trusted in any way shape or form can avoid taking their meds. Just remember Ivermectin and all those alternative drugs are also made by the folks at Big Pharma.

What's to stop Big Pharma from putting mRNA on everything???
 
You’re such a kunt. Get it?

The original strain killed all the mice? I never saw that part; do you have proof of that?
It’s right in the article you shared in order to claim the “gain of function” research.

Do you not read the shit that you feel is so urgent to share and use in your stupid anti-vax narrative, you fvcking dummy?

I love it when you twats post stuff that wrecks your own argument.
 
80% is less than 100%

For example: You have two groups of mice, 100 in each group. You give group A the original strain, and group B the “Boston University” strain.

100% of group A dies. 100 mice dead.
80% of group B dies. 80 mice dead. 20 live. This is a decrease.

80 mice is less than 100. This means the Boston strain is less deadly.
“Gain” is synonymous with “increase” or “add” or “more”.
You can’t have “gain” in virulence by making something weaker.

Less is not more.

Get it?

It's negative gain, like when you turndown the gains on your amp.
 
It’s right in the article you shared in order to claim the “gain of function” research.

Do you not read the shit that you feel is so urgent to share and use in your stupid anti-vax narrative, you fvcking dummy?

I love it when you twats post stuff that wrecks your own argument.

It's reverse gain of function!!! I hear Fauci himself conducted the experiments.

Sometimes I wonder if some of these right wing disinformation sites aren't just clowning their audience.
 
Suspicious how they want to force vaccinate kids for a disease they have such little of chance of having severe disease..

I don't know about "they" but since both of my kids participate in competitive athletics, it made sense to get the vax to reduce their chances of getting myocarditis (compared to catching covid). OTOH, CDC may be involved in worldwide conspiracy to misled me with false data. Only Bill Gates & the Lizard People know the truth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
816,082
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top