What is?

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Which "scientist"? The scientist creating the vaccine?

Is it the same scientists that said you won’t catch covid if you take the vaccines?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘A US lab has been accused of "playing with fire" after it created a hybrid super-covid that killed 80% of the mice it was tested on.’

‘Professor Shmuel Shapira, a leading scientist in the Israeli Government, said: "This should be totally forbidden, it's playing with fire."

Dr Richard Ebright, a chemist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, told DailyMail.com that: "The research is a clear example of gain of function research.’

‘Dr Ebright told DailyMail.com: "The research is a clear example of gain of function research of concern and enhanced potential pandemic pathogen (ePPP) research.

"It is especially concerning that this new US-government ePPP research - like the previous US-government ePPP research on chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses at Wuhan Institute of Virology that may have caused the pandemic - appears not to have undergone the prior risk-benefit review mandated under US-government policies.’

Expert warns lab 'playing with fire' creating super-covid 'with 80% kill rate'

Boston University scientists faced criticism after they combined Omicron and the original Wuhan strain, despite the fact that sort of research is what is thought to be behind the Covid pandemic

www.dailystar.co.uk

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

100% safe and effective:

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Which "scientist"? The scientist creating the vaccine?

You said it was Democrats that did it.
Since when is science a political endeavour?
Is that why you think it's a "left-leaning" fact that bones have nerves in them? "Right-leaning" bones fall under a different political philosophy?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

‘A US lab has been accused of "playing with fire" after it created a hybrid super-covid that killed 80% of the mice it was tested on.’

‘Professor Shmuel Shapira, a leading scientist in the Israeli Government, said: "This should be totally forbidden, it's playing with fire."

Dr Richard Ebright, a chemist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, told DailyMail.com that: "The research is a clear example of gain of function research.’

‘Dr Ebright told DailyMail.com: "The research is a clear example of gain of function research of concern and enhanced potential pandemic pathogen (ePPP) research.

"It is especially concerning that this new US-government ePPP research - like the previous US-government ePPP research on chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses at Wuhan Institute of Virology that may have caused the pandemic - appears not to have undergone the prior risk-benefit review mandated under US-government policies.’

Expert warns lab 'playing with fire' creating super-covid 'with 80% kill rate'

Boston University scientists faced criticism after they combined Omicron and the original Wuhan strain, despite the fact that sort of research is what is thought to be behind the Covid pandemic

www.dailystar.co.uk

The original COVID killed 100% of the mice.
80% is less than 100%
The means it is a less-than-super hybrid.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You said it was Democrats that did it.
Since when is science a political endeavour?
Is that why you think it's a "left-leaning" fact that bones have nerves in them? "Right-leaning" bones fall under a different political philosophy?

Don't comment on my post if you are confused. What you have posted has nothing to do with my post that you quoted. Retard.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Don't comment on my post if you are confused. What you have posted has nothing to do with my post that you quoted. Retard.

You made the claim that I was "left-leaning" because I could prove nerves were in bones.
You also claimed the Democrats released Covid. Then you said it was scientists. Ergo, scientists are Democrats and science is political.

Try to keep up with your own bullshit for a change.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You made the claim that I was "left-leaning" because I could prove nerves were in bones.
You also claimed the Democrats released Covid. Then you said it was scientists. Ergo, scientists are Democrats and science is political.

Try to keep up with your own bullshit for a change.

WTF are you babbling???? Booby posted showing "scientist" estimating how many lives have been saved by the vaccine.

I said, which scientist, the ones making the vaccine.

YOU try to keep up, idiot.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 43770

Please explain this “leftist science” concept.
What is “leftist science”, what is “rightist science”, and do they work together? Or, do all the leftist scientists group together, and s the rightists group together?

Do they get their degrees from specific universities, or can one university churn out both leftist and rightist scientists?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Which "scientist"? The scientist creating the vaccine?

Go read it kid.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

100% safe and effective:

Crack pot. How do you prove he is lying? He can't and has zero proof of what he is saying. It's just his opinion. Nothing to see here. Move on.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Go read it kid.

View attachment 43771

Nobody cares about your biased studies.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Is it the same scientists that said you won’t catch covid if you take the vaccines?

Rachel Maddow isn't scientist.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

‘A US lab has been accused of "playing with fire" after it created a hybrid super-covid that killed 80% of the mice it was tested on.’

‘Professor Shmuel Shapira, a leading scientist in the Israeli Government, said: "This should be totally forbidden, it's playing with fire."

Dr Richard Ebright, a chemist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, told DailyMail.com that: "The research is a clear example of gain of function research.’

‘Dr Ebright told DailyMail.com: "The research is a clear example of gain of function research of concern and enhanced potential pandemic pathogen (ePPP) research.

"It is especially concerning that this new US-government ePPP research - like the previous US-government ePPP research on chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses at Wuhan Institute of Virology that may have caused the pandemic - appears not to have undergone the prior risk-benefit review mandated under US-government policies.’

Expert warns lab 'playing with fire' creating super-covid 'with 80% kill rate'

Boston University scientists faced criticism after they combined Omicron and the original Wuhan strain, despite the fact that sort of research is what is thought to be behind the Covid pandemic

www.dailystar.co.uk

Is it gain of function if the virus doesn't actually gain function and becomes less deadly?