What is?

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Humor you. How about first you get your nomenclature correct. That picture is showing 10 speaker connections/outputs for that one channel.

So that makes it a ten-output amp, correct?

How many outputs are on this amplifier circuit?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So that makes it a ten-output amp, correct?

No, it makes it a 10 output mono amp.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So that makes it a ten-output amp, correct?

Look, details matter. If you want to be correct then use literally 1 speaker output on a mono amp. A positive and a negative terminal. Then you will have a 1 output mono amp.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I used to fix amps. One output, one channel, X number of terminals/connections. For example, the number of output on my amplifier didn't increase 2 to 6 when I hooked up a 3 way crossover and hooked up 6 speakers. OTOH, if I don't hook up a speaker to my amplifer, it doesn't become a zero output amplifer.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I used to fix amps. One output, one channel, X number of terminals/connections. For example, the number of output on my amplifier didn't increase 2 to 6 when I hooked up a 3 way crossover and hooked up 6 speakers. OTOH, if I don't hook up a speaker to my amplifer, it doesn't become a zero output amplifer.

Are you saying a mono amplifier has only one output no matter how many speaker terminals it has connected to it?

This pic from Rockford doesn’t show a 4-output mono amplifier?

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

Rob how about you start a new thread in the audio section about this topic.....make another user account and argue with yourself for page after page....that would be very entertaining if you can pull it off...you will gain my repsect if you can go 50 pages

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

Back on topic

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob how about you start a new thread in the audio section about this topic.....make another user account and argue with yourself for page after page....that would be very entertaining if you can pull it off...you will gain my repsect if you can go 50 pages

Someone getting triggered that he finally spoke for himself and was wrong?
Maybe you SHOULD stick to the memes. At least you can blame them on somebody else

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Here we go again.....

Redirect Notice

That's the one they need to release on the public.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Thx is arguing that they are for "lazy" people and "nefarious" purposes.
The thing about that guy is that he gets proved wrong about something, then he doubles/triples/etc. down and will fight forever to say he is right. Witness the whole nerves-in-bone discussion. To the very end, he was claiming it was a "theory".

Hell, in the post below, he is arguing against the concept of averages with household size. He really thinks they are saying that a household has only a part of a person (similar to his "how do you vaccinate part of a person?" spiel).
View attachment 43668

He really just doesn't understand basic math concepts even though he claims to do advanced math in his daily job that we simply couldn't understand.
I guarantee he'll refuse to answer my Buffalo wings question b/c it would be him proving himself wrong.

Is it proved or proven wrong? Are they both correct?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Is it proved or proven wrong? Are they both correct?

Proved is traditionally correct verbiage that is preferred, but proven is becoming more acceptable through usage.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Back on topic
View attachment 43709

How does making a weaker variant help the election?
”When infected with just the original strain of Covid-19 100% of the mice died…”
Facts ARE import. So are details.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Back on topic
View attachment 43709

That is illegal gain of function:

‘Researchers at Boston University have created a new strain of Covid-19 that has an 80% kill rate in humanized mice.’

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

That is illegal gain of function:

‘Researchers at Boston University have created a new strain of Covid-19 that has an 80% kill rate in humanized mice.’

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Not that facts matter when you have a chosen narrative, but according to B.U.: https://www.bu.edu/articles/2022/neidl-researchers-refute-uk-article-about-covid-strain/
Corley says the news reports pulled one line from the paper’s abstract out of context, with the Daily Mail suggesting in its headline that the researchers had created a “deadly Covid strain with an 80 percent kill rate.” The newspaper went on to make a series of other misleading claims, including that the study was “gain of function research,” alleging researchers set out to make a more deadly virus.

Not true, says Corley. And the University’s statement strongly denied it.

“We want to address the false and inaccurate reporting about Boston University COVID-19 research, which appeared today in the Daily Mail,” said the BU statement. “First, this research is not gain-of-function research, meaning it did not amplify the Washington state SARS-CoV-2 virus strain or make it more dangerous. In fact, this research made the virus replicate less dangerous.”

Corley says the line pulled out of context actually had nothing to do with the virus’ effect on humans. The study began in a tissue culture, then moved to an animal model.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Not that facts matter when you have a chosen narrative, but according to B.U.: https://www.bu.edu/articles/2022/neidl-researchers-refute-uk-article-about-covid-strain/
Corley says the news reports pulled one line from the paper’s abstract out of context, with the Daily Mail suggesting in its headline that the researchers had created a “deadly Covid strain with an 80 percent kill rate.” The newspaper went on to make a series of other misleading claims, including that the study was “gain of function research,” alleging researchers set out to make a more deadly virus.

Not true, says Corley. And the University’s statement strongly denied it.

“We want to address the false and inaccurate reporting about Boston University COVID-19 research, which appeared today in the Daily Mail,” said the BU statement. “First, this research is not gain-of-function research, meaning it did not amplify the Washington state SARS-CoV-2 virus strain or make it more dangerous. In fact, this research made the virus replicate less dangerous.”

Corley says the line pulled out of context actually had nothing to do with the virus’ effect on humans. The study began in a tissue culture, then moved to an animal model.

This type of research started the whole covid pandemic; not sure why you’re defending it.