What is?

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Look back...I admitted I was trolling you with that ffs

Ok. And? Please prove the media called the rioters heroes?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Ok. And? Please prove the media called the rioters heroes?

Ffs if I need I to explain to you how the rioters were put on a pedestal...you weren't watching the news...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Ffs if I need I to explain to you how the rioters were put on a pedestal...you weren't watching the news...

You said it. Prove it. Show me one time where the rioters were called heroes?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

You said it. Prove it. Show me one time where the rioters were called heroes?

Omg you're either joking or a fckn dumbazz...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Omg you're either joking or a fckn dumbazz...

You said it and can't prove it. Take it easy man.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Do you think the people wouldn't have rioted if the news wasn't there?

Not a 100% sure what you're asking - ie if CNN didn't exist or if news reporters weren't on scene....

Nevertheless, what I saw was a relentless pushing of a narrative that blacks were getting fvcked by the police - that narrative ran for over a year. Every night (on CNN at least) they were running stories about this black man shot by police, another case of police violence against a black man, etc. I never saw a story about a white guy getting shot by the police. I never saw any investigative journalism revealing that whites have about as many violent encounters with the police as blacks (even from Fox). MSM made no effort to put things in perspective. So yes, I think if you push a negative narrative enough, people will react negatively. I've said it before and I'll say it again, if the narrative that CNN, MSNBC, et al laid out was indeed true, then I would have been downtown raising hell too.

Same with Trump/Jan 6th - you keep telling people "they stole election" and eventually people are going to react negatively. Keep in mind Trump started his "big lie" in April/May of 2020 - so close to year of getting people riled up. And Trump keeps pushing that narrative. I won't be the least bit surprised if we see violence at ballot boxes because somebody sees somebody else dropping off 4 ballots. And just like I think Trump has an obligation to act responsibly (and truthfully) so do Rachel Maddow, Cooper Anderson, CNN, etc.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[El Wapo]

Omg you're either joking or a fckn dumbazz...

I go with the latter....typical lib all mouth and no brains

 

[El Wapo]

You said it. Prove it. Show me one time where the rioters were called heroes?

Amid demonstrations, liberal elites praise violence as protest tool

Some call them protesters. Others call them rioters. But to America’s enlightened elites, there’s only one word that will do: Heroes. And like Batman, The Dark Knight, they are the “heroes” American liberals deserve. There’s an ast…

www.bostonherald.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Amid demonstrations, liberal elites praise violence as protest tool

Some call them protesters. Others call them rioters. But to America’s enlightened elites, there’s only one word that will do: Heroes. And like Batman, The Dark Knight, they are the “heroes” American liberals deserve. There’s an ast…

www.bostonherald.com

This is an opinion piece.
He opens with: "Some call them protesters. Others call them rioters. But to America’s enlightened elites, there’s only one word that will do: Heroes.", then goes on to write "There’s an astonishing story in the Boston Globe-Democrat""..."in which Newbury Street shop owners hit by looters and vandals Sunday night still stand by the protest “heroes.”

The only one calling the rioters "heroes" is the guy writing the opinion piece, and he does it in a sardonic manner. He never says or shows that anyone has called the rioters heroes. No quotes, not evena reference to hearing it, especially from the "enlightened elites".

If you think this is in some way proof that the media called the rioters heroes, it may explain why you so readily believe and repost so many stupid and inaccurate memes in this forum.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I love how people misrepresent the info I share @Jimi77

‘A new study conducted by scientists from Harvard and Johns Hopkins, currently in pre-print, reveals that the COVID-19 vaccines were up to 98 times worse than the virus itself.’

Xoilac 365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoi Lac TV #1 full HD

Kênh bóng đá trực tuyến Xoilac365.tv✅ nguồn link trực tiếp bóng đá Xoilac TV full HD. Phát sóng trực tuyến Xôi Lạc TV tructiepbongda chất lượng cao.

www.theflstandard.com

So…scientists from Harvard and John Hopkins are conspiracy theorists?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I love how people misrepresent the info I share @Jimi77

‘A new study conducted by scientists from Harvard and Johns Hopkins, currently in pre-print, reveals that the COVID-19 vaccines were up to 98 times worse than the virus itself.’

Xoilac 365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoi Lac TV #1 full HD

Kênh bóng đá trực tuyến Xoilac365.tv✅ nguồn link trực tiếp bóng đá Xoilac TV full HD. Phát sóng trực tuyến Xôi Lạc TV tructiepbongda chất lượng cao.

www.theflstandard.com

So…scientists from Harvard and John Hopkins are conspiracy theorists?

Here’s the study:

‘1) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group; 2) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people; 3) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; 4) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and 5) mandates create wider social harms.’

COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities

Students at North American universities risk disenrollment due to third dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates. We present a risk-benefit assessment of boosters in this

papers.ssrn.com

Super effective

‘We estimate that 22,000 - 30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation.’

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Here’s the study:

‘1) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group; 2) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people; 3) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; 4) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and 5) mandates create wider social harms.’

COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities

Students at North American universities risk disenrollment due to third dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates. We present a risk-benefit assessment of boosters in this

papers.ssrn.com

Super effective

‘We estimate that 22,000 - 30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation.’

22,000/225,000,000 = 1/1,000% That's one one-thousandth of a percent.
The polio vaccine efficacy can be as low as 99%. That's a possible 1% failure rate.
Would you call it "ineffective"?

Funny that you still try SO hard to say the COVID vax doesn't work, in full disregard of the myriad facts against your argument. Is it that you are completely blinded by your weird hatred of medical technology, or do you simply not understand the statistics that consistently prove you wrong?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

22,000/225,000,000 = 1/1,000% That's one one-thousandth of a percent.

That’s not even what that’s saying…it’s saying you have to vaccinate 22k-30k people to prevent 1 hospitalization.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

That’s not even what that’s saying…it’s saying you have to vaccinate 22k-30k people to prevent 1 hospitalization.

Do you not even know what you post?
"We estimate that 22,000 - 30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalization"
That's 22,000 out of 225,000,000. That = .00009, which is 9/1,000% (my numbers were off because I was trying to recall what 5 decimal places was, but 1 vs 9 in THOUSANDTHS of a percent is statistically a non-issue).

You used 9/1,000 % to sarcastically say "super effective". Yet, that percentage actually proves very high efficacy.
You failed.