Winners only.

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

If it’s nanotechnology and not a real virus, then it’s a hoax. Pretty much by definition.
hoax -a humorous or malicious deception.

I spelled it out for you.

An artificial virus is nanotechnology, just like MRNA is nanotechnology.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

An artificial virus is nanotechnology, just like MRNA is nanotechnology.

Where’s the proof this is a hoax virus?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Can you read? I don’t think covid is a hoax; stop spreading misinformation. I think the response to covid is a hoax, as in the response is built around a fake scientific narrative. How much more do you need me to spell it out? Covid is a nanotechnology attack on humanity from the $cientism.

I didn't say you thought "covid" was a hoax. Did you not notice I gave some other options for how one might view Covid? In your case psych-op would probably be the best description.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Where’s the proof this is a hoax virus?

Have you not been following Tyler Durden's extensive journalistic efforts in this area???

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Syosset is libertarian not a conspiracy loon...it's a pretty interesting watch even if you disagree with him...

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

WTF?!?!?!

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Syosset is libertarian not a conspiracy loon...it's a pretty interesting watch even if you disagree with him...

I like Stossel, haven't watched him in a while. However, this is stuff happening on the fringe. This is why it's important to take a few minutes or an hour of your time to dig into what you're being told. Ie, I can make all the adverse side effects of covid vaxes look very sciencey and horrific. However, once put into proper context, the vax certainly appears to be a better option than catching the real deal.

Furthermore, science should be defined by the scientific method, peer review, etc - I highly doubt any of those publications really qualify as scientific. Just because I claim to be a billionaire doesn't make me one.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I like Stossel, haven't watched him in a while. However, this is stuff happening on the fringe. This is why it's important to take a few minutes or an hour of your time to dig into what you're being told. Ie, I can make all the adverse side effects of covid vaxes look very sciencey and horrific. However, once put into proper context, the vax certainly appears to be a better option than catching the real deal.

Furthermore, science should be defined by the scientific method, peer review, etc - I highly doubt any of those publications really qualify as scientific. Just because I claim to be a billionaire doesn't make me one.

It just shows not all "science" touted by those in power is worth anything...the scientific method should be the standard but I think there's a lot shenanigans in the community atm...not necessarily with the vax...that's more political anymore...

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I

It just shows not all "science" touted by those in power is worth anything...the scientific method should be the standard but I think there's a lot shenanigans in the community atm...not necessarily with the vax...that's more political anymore...

The right seems to benefit the most from the shenanigans currently. If 65% of your constitutents don't trust science, you can pretty much say anything. For example, the way they twisted and distorted VARES data. Ivermectin is another good example: a doctor did indeed find ivermectin to be effective. However, upon peer review flaws and biases were found in his study.. Being the good Doc that he was he re-did the study, foud no benefit to using ivermectin and recanted his earlier research. Obviously, you never heard the second part of that story from the right.

Unfortunately, the left has fallen for the pseudo science of the ***** crowd and taken to lopping off elementary school kids peckers because they're confused about their gender identity after being introduced to some pretty confusing gender identity concepts. Duh!!!

Do these kids really need to hear about this stuff prior to HS? Personally, I've had to have the gender conversation with my 9 year old because the info is out there now.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

The right seems to benefit the most from the shenanigans currently. If 65% of your constitutents don't trust science, you can pretty much say anything. For example, the way they twisted and distorted VARES data. Ivermectin is another good example: a doctor did indeed find ivermectin to be effective. However, upon peer review flaws and biases were found in his study.. Being the good Doc that he was he re-did the study, foud no benefit to using ivermectin and recanted his earlier research. Obviously, you never heard the second part of that story from the right.

Unfortunately, the left has fallen for the pseudo science of the ***** crowd and taken to lopping off elementary school kids peckers because they're confused about their gender identity after being introduced to some pretty confusing gender identity concepts. Duh!!!

Do these kids really need to hear about this stuff prior to HS? Personally, I've had to have the gender conversation with my 9 year old because the info is out there now.
[/QUOTE]
As a child, you could have told me til the cows come home that I didn’t like girls. Wouldn’t have changed a thing.

Only became moreso as I got older. To the point where it interfered with life at times.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

As a child, you could have told me til the cows come home that I didn’t like girls. Wouldn’t have changed a thing.

Only became moreso as I got older. To the point where it interfered with life at times.

I know what you mean.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

If they believed Covid was hoax, then they were getting their info Tyler Durden (ie Buck) or Alex Jones or Q or some idiot who eventually got de-platformed from Youtube. The anti-vaxxers aren't getting their "news" from Trump either. You're twisting yourself into a pretzel over your hatred of Trump. There is plenty to criticize Trump over without inventing stuff. This is just like when the right stretches the bounds of logic trying to put any and everything that goes wrong at Biden's doorstep and look foolish in the process.

Answer me this. Did Trump show himself getting vaxxed? Yes or no? Did Trump ever say that he can't wait to be vaxxed when the vaccine was available? Did Trump ever wear a mask? Did Trump make fun of people who wore a mask? Did Trump say the virus would "magically" disappear? Did Trump ever call our Doctors and Scientists idiots? Answer me those questions kid.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Nope never wore one...

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

And what does it matter if he didn't use getting vaccinated as a publicity stunt..

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

The right seems to benefit the most from the shenanigans currently. If 65% of your constitutents don't trust science, you can pretty much say anything. For example, the way they twisted and distorted VARES data. Ivermectin is another good example: a doctor did indeed find ivermectin to be effective. However, upon peer review flaws and biases were found in his study.. Being the good Doc that he was he re-did the study, foud no benefit to using ivermectin and recanted his earlier research. Obviously, you never heard the second part of that story from the right.

Unfortunately, the left has fallen for the pseudo science of the ***** crowd and taken to lopping off elementary school kids peckers because they're confused about their gender identity after being introduced to some pretty confusing gender identity concepts. Duh!!!

Do these kids really need to hear about this stuff prior to HS? Personally, I've had to have the gender conversation with my 9 year old because the info is out there now.

.