Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You attack the Church and those who may believe in a higher power but are ok with those in the LGBTQRSTOV community that teach kids to be gay, touch, molest, take indecent liberties with children, rape children... this community is ok with you because what, not all of them do it? Do you think every clergy person touches little boys? Why be bigoted to one but not the other... hypocrisy? Maybe?

The LGBTQ community is teaching kids to rape children?
 
I didn't find it sexual in any way. Did you get turned on by what you saw? Does it make you mad that it turned you on a little bit?

This isn't just guys dressed up as gals, what I saw was basically a burlesque show. That guy was prancing around with pasties on his surgically augmented breasts with dollar bills stuffed into his thong holding a ~5 year old girl's hand.

I consider myself pretty liberal on this issue, but if you don't draw the line there, then where the hell do you draw the line? If it isn't sex, it isn't sexual??? Seriously how can you not find that incredibly inappropriate for children??? The should lose their liquor license.
 
What if you found out that all of the people there were part of a local Republican party? Who ever said it was "drag shows for kids?" Is that how they advertised it?

The article says it's a weekly drag bunch. The owner/manager/staff should not have let children in during their weekly drag show. Not a fan of the law per se, but these guys should lose their liquor license IMHO, or at least pay a hefty fine.
 
The priest that touch kids should be hung...just like anybody that does as well...

I really hope you're just trying to to find an argument for arguments sake...that fact that there's pedos in the Vatican doesn't make holding sexualized events for kids ok (and frankly it doesn't matter who holds the event, it's fckn wrong)...

Doesn't even matter that it was LGBTQ event. I could care less about the guy/gal's sexual orientation, biological gender, etc. That is not the right environment for a ~5 year old girl.
 
The article says it's a weekly drag bunch. The owner/manager/staff should not have let children in during their weekly drag show. Not a fan of the law per se, but these guys should lose their liquor license IMHO, or at least pay a hefty fine.

What exactly were the doing with the kids that was sexual? Did any kids get raped or molested? Were they forcing the little boys to kiss other little boys? Were they forcing the little girls to kiss other little girls? Just curious.
 
Screenshot_20220731-125401_Facebook.jpg
 
I leave other parents alone. I'm not going to tell anybody how to raise their own kids. Should we send child services to the family that makes their kids go to Church three or four times a week? What about the parents that force their kids into sports? What about parents that force their kids to be on a diet? What about parents who force their kids to do all the work around the house and never let them play with friends? What about parents who have loud sex while there kids are listening in the other room? What about parents who are practicing Satanists? Where exactly should we draw the line?
You established your rules when you raised your own kids. Where are your limits?
 
You established your rules when you raised your own kids. Where are your limits?
Why should he establish limits when the courts can do it for us?
Up next is our right to use birth control. Following that, maybe they can tell us what religion we have to follow.

Nothing like having the immoral minority decide what goes for the country:
In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” he (Judge Clarence Thomas) wrote, referring to the Supreme Court cases that found a privacy-enshrined right to contraception, sexual contact with someone of the same sex, and same-sex marriage.”

He forgot to mention interracial relationships, which fall under the same legal principle.
Convenient. And rather selective.
 
So it’s bad to attack the church for actually harboring molesters and paying people off to keep quiet, but OK to accuse the LBGTQ community of grooming kids for sexual impropriety, just because you assume that is their goal?
Yes, I am bigoted to the ones that have been proved to be dirty but their acts are covered up or attempted to be.
Have you witnessed sexual impropriety from a member of the LGBTQ community?
Of course I have.
 
Can you prove any of that nonsense that you just stated? Is it just your opinion?
Let me help you Mr. College Ball Player. These are questions... denoted by the ?'s They are not accusations to be proven or disproved.

So to directly answer your questions. No I can not prove anything I stated. This is just the nature of a question... it seeks AN answer, not AN argument.

No, these questions are not my opinions, they are questions - a sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit information.
 
The LGBTQ community is teaching kids to rape children?
So far you have been great at reading, comprehension and being able to see both sides of the conversation. However, this question seems to be a deviation from your normal responses. I did not say the community as a whole which is what your phrasing is suggesting. I specifically said those within the community. This is directed literally to those who have done such a thing. They have done this such of thing and I posted about 118 of them being arrested. It is verifiable facts and these people were within this specific community.
 
Last edited:
Why should he establish limits when the courts can do it for us?
Up next is our right to use birth control. Following that, maybe they can tell us what religion we have to follow.

Nothing like having the immoral minority decide what goes for the country:
In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” he (Judge Clarence Thomas) wrote, referring to the Supreme Court cases that found a privacy-enshrined right to contraception, sexual contact with someone of the same sex, and same-sex marriage.”

He forgot to mention interracial relationships, which fall under the same legal principle.
Convenient. And rather selective.
Talk the big talk. Nobody can make any claims (about raising children) that they didn't value enough to instill on their own child(ren).

I invite you to dispute my actual post rather than reacting to the post that I responded to.
 
Talk the big talk. Nobody can make any claims (about raising children) that they didn't value enough to instill on their own child(ren).

I invite you to dispute my actual post rather than reacting to the post that I responded to.
“Talk the big talk”?
Am I wrong about the quote of Judge Thomas? Was I too sarcastic in asking why we need to set limits if a conservative court can do it for us?m

My limits would be to educate children instead of trying to hide things with a puritanical approach to life.
Reality exists. Do you think you’re “protecting” a child by denying reality under the guise of a “nice bearded man in the sky” who loves all “he” has created, but demands the followers hate many of the creations?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
969,544
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
561786595_18427607485102160_7010259965928918509_n.jpg

just call me KeV

    Oct 9, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
561583216_18427455586102160_8141545757991593433_n.jpg

just call me KeV

    Oct 9, 2025
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top