What is?

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Lots of fluff, silly pictures and memes, and failed insult attempts and namecalling.

Can you quote the Federal laws that you claim are being broken, or not? Can you cite the CFR?
It’s all I’m asking for.
A picture of Bill Gates or snd Egyptian glyph doesn’t do me much good.

CFR is not a legislative body, and I like how you don’t quote my first post, gaslighter.

And that’s also because you have no idea what you’re talking about. I maintain full medical autonomy over my body. If you don’t like that, you’re a Nazi, Nazi.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

CFR is not a legislative body, and I like how you don’t quote my first post, gaslighter.

And that’s also because you have no idea what you’re talking about. I maintain full medical autonomy over my body. If you don’t like that, you’re a Nazi, Nazi.

Code of Federal Regulation is the listing of Federal law.
I am asking you to show the federal law that says an employer cannot require vaccination of an employee.
I am asking you to show the federal law that says a person cannot be required to have a vaccination.
You have stated it is illegal. I am asking you to prove your statement. No gaslighting, just asking you to prove your claims.
Why is that so terribly difficult for these “facts” you are claiming?
Do you have nothing more you can do than namecalling and making empty claims?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Code of Federal Regulation is the listing of Federal law.
I am asking you to show the federal law that says an employer cannot require vaccination of an employee.
I am asking you to show the federal law that says a person cannot be required to have a vaccination.
You have stated it is illegal. I am asking you to prove your statement. No gaslighting, just asking you to prove your claims.
Why is that so terribly difficult for these “facts” you are claiming?
Do you have nothing more you can do than namecalling and making empty claims?

I said Joe Biden, f*ggot. The President can’t mandate vaccinations for an experimental procedure.

Let me ask it this way:

Do you want a civil war, f*ggot? Because that’s where these experimental vaccine mandates that didn’t have to follow federal vaccine guidelines go.

If you knew anything about legal precedents, you’d know this is illegal as f*ck, because it’s all an experiment.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘Republican leaders — and some union chiefs, too — have said that Biden was going too far in trying to muscle private companies and workers. One of the first to speak out was Gov. Henry McMaster of South Carolina, who said on Twitter that his state would fight to “the gates of hell to protect the liberty and livelihood of every South Carolinian.”

Writing to Biden that the vaccine “edict is also illegal,” Wilson warned that courts have fully upheld only one of 10 emergency temporary OSHA standards in recent decades
The prosecutors also cautioned that the “edict is unlikely to win hearts and minds — it will simply drive further skepticism” over vaccines.’

GOP prosecutors threaten lawsuits over vaccine requirement

In a letter addressed to President Joe Biden Thursday, attorneys general from 24 states called the vaccine mandate a "threat to individual liberty."

www.wfaa.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Code of Federal Regulation is the listing of Federal law.
I am asking you to show the federal law that says an employer cannot require vaccination of an employee.
I am asking you to show the federal law that says a person cannot be required to have a vaccination.
You have stated it is illegal. I am asking you to prove your statement. No gaslighting, just asking you to prove your claims.
Why is that so terribly difficult for these “facts” you are claiming?
Do you have nothing more you can do than namecalling and making empty claims?

Wiener

‘ORLANDO, FL -- Federal law provides that at least until a vaccine is fully approved by the FDA, individuals must have the option to accept or decline the experimental drug.

On March 27, 2020, the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary declared that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use (EUA) of drugs and biological products for COVID-19. That means people must be told the risks and benefits, and they have the right to decline a medication that is not fully licensed. The same section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that authorizes the FDA to grant EUA also requires the secretary of Health and Human Services to “ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed … of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”

All of the COVID-19 mRNA injections (Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna) or vaccines (Johnson & Johnson and Astra Zeneca) have received only EAU authorization and not full FDA approval.

When the FDA grants EUA for a vaccine, many questions about the product cannot be answered because the testing data is unavailable. Therefore, when Congress granted the authority to issue EUAs, it mandated that individuals must be allowed to decide for themselves whether to receive an EUA product.’

https://www.thedesertreview.com/health/experimental-covid-shots-cannot-be-mandated/article_89b901ae-8126-11eb-a78d-07c0c7e926df.html

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Wiener

‘ORLANDO, FL -- Federal law provides that at least until a vaccine is fully approved by the FDA, individuals must have the option to accept or decline the experimental drug.

On March 27, 2020, the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary declared that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use (EUA) of drugs and biological products for COVID-19. That means people must be told the risks and benefits, and they have the right to decline a medication that is not fully licensed. The same section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that authorizes the FDA to grant EUA also requires the secretary of Health and Human Services to “ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed … of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”

All of the COVID-19 mRNA injections (Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna) or vaccines (Johnson & Johnson and Astra Zeneca) have received only EAU authorization and not full FDA approval.

When the FDA grants EUA for a vaccine, many questions about the product cannot be answered because the testing data is unavailable. Therefore, when Congress granted the authority to issue EUAs, it mandated that individuals must be allowed to decide for themselves whether to receive an EUA product.’

https://www.thedesertreview.com/health/experimental-covid-shots-cannot-be-mandated/article_89b901ae-8126-11eb-a78d-07c0c7e926df.html

Yes. This doesn’t say it is illegal to require individuals to be vaccinated. It says even under an EUA, individuals can decline.
That does not mean all consequences or repercussions of declining are eliminated, however.

So I’ll ask again:Show me the law that says vaccination cannot be required for employment, or for persons in general.
The federal law. Not statute or local regulation.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Code of Federal Regulation is the listing of Federal law.
I am asking you to show the federal law that says an employer cannot require vaccination of an employee.
I am asking you to show the federal law that says a person cannot be required to have a vaccination.
You have stated it is illegal. I am asking you to prove your statement. No gaslighting, just asking you to prove your claims.
Why is that so terribly difficult for these “facts” you are claiming?
Do you have nothing more you can do than namecalling and making empty claims?

Oh, my bad. There’s more than one CFR.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Yes. This doesn’t say it is illegal to require individuals to be vaccinated. It says even under an EUA, individuals can decline.
That does not mean all consequences or repercussions of declining are eliminated, however.

So I’ll ask again:Show me the law that says vaccination cannot be required for employment, or for persons in general.
The federal law. Not statute or local regulation.

I was talking about Joe Biden issuing the EO on vaccine mandates. You responded with companies. Stop trying to bullshit me.

Punishing people for not being willing participants of experimental vaccinations or medications is illegal, because it’s their right to refuse. A business firing a worker for not taking an EXPERIMENT is MEDICAL DISCRIMINATION. It makes zero logical sense for a company to fire someone for not being a willing participant in mass, f*ggot. Why don’t you go join the Azov Nazi Battalion? Because you’re sure as hell not an American that believes in freedom of choice, except only when it involves baby murder. Is it my body, my choice or not, you totalitarian scumbag?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘Before a healthcare provider can begin any course of treatment, they must make you aware of what they plan to do. That means they must disclose as much information as possible so you can make an informed decision about your care.

When a healthcare provider sufficiently informs you about the treatment options, you have the right to accept or refuse treatment.

It is unethical to physically force or coerce someone into treatment against their will if they are of sound mind and are mentally capable of making an informed decision.’

Do You Have the Right to Refuse Medical Treatment?

Most patients have the final decision on medical care, including the right to refuse treatment. Learn the exceptions and how to use this right.

www.verywellhealth.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Yes. This doesn’t say it is illegal to require individuals to be vaccinated. It says even under an EUA, individuals can decline.
That does not mean all consequences or repercussions of declining are eliminated, however.

So I’ll ask again:Show me the law that says vaccination cannot be required for employment, or for persons in general.
The federal law. Not statute or local regulation.

‘Even before the pandemic, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and courts nationwide recognized that employees – even nurses and CNAs – had a right to refuse to take a vaccine because of a sincerely held religious belief or a medical reason. Those exceptions apply to refusals to take the COVID-19 vaccine, too. Firing or otherwise disciplining employees who have a legitimate religious exemption violates federal civil rights laws; firing or otherwise disciplining employees who have a legitimate medical exemption violates the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Remember that we are still under the vaccines' Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) period. The EEOC has indicated that employers can require that employees get vaccinated, but the EUA statute contains some language saying that people have a right to refuse any vaccine during the EUA period. Courts have not yet decided the issue. So, there's some legal risk for employers that choose to mandate that employees get vaccinated.’

Declining a Shot in the Arm: What Employers Should Do When Employees Refuse Vaccines

Even before the pandemic, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and courts nationwide recognized that employees – even nurses and CNAs – had a right to refuse to take a vaccine because of a sincerely held religious belief or a medical reason. Those exceptions apply to refusals to...

www.natlawreview.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘Beyond that, however, Biden’s order is unconstitutional. Under our federal system, the U.S. government does not have the power to require an adult American to do something with, or put something into, his or her body. Indeed, it doesn’t even have the power to order an adult to buy a commercial product: That’s why Obamacare’s individual “mandate” was structured as a tax rather than a command. Even the Obama administration understood that the federal government could not constitutionally treat its citizens like subjects. Biden seems to understand this, too, when it comes to issues he cares about, such as abortion rights. His administration ironically filed suit on Thursday to enjoin Texas’s new “fetal heartbeat” law, which is opposed by abortion rights advocates as violating the principle that it is the sacred right of a woman to do what she wants with her body. The logical disconnect between the suit and the order is mind-blowing.‘

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/09/10/biden-covid-vaccine-mandate-unconstitutional-unnecessary/

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Yes. This doesn’t say it is illegal to require individuals to be vaccinated. It says even under an EUA, individuals can decline.
That does not mean all consequences or repercussions of declining are eliminated, however.

So I’ll ask again:Show me the law that says vaccination cannot be required for employment, or for persons in general.
The federal law. Not statute or local regulation.

I’ll say this, too: vaccines are fundamentally designed to stimulate the immune system. I have like half a dozen immune disease related and severe health issues. My celiac disease can kill me, and my immune diseases are from an already over-reactive immune system. I have the right to refuse any vaccination due to the simple fact that they are designed to stimulate one’s immune system. If my immune dysfunction gets worse and hurts my gut, I could literally die, bro.

I’m so disabled that I get sick grocery shopping for myself. Now, if I worked at a hospital, and they fired me for refusing the EXPERIMENTAL vaccinations, and I applied to opt out for my personal health reasons, that would be highly illegal. Forced medications are just anti-American, period. Forcing people to live a certain lifestyle is 100% the opposite of what the constitutional republic of the USA stands for.

Traditional vaccines have adjuvants, which are literally materials in vaccines that are specifically designed to stimulate the immune system, which could literally kill me. One common adjuvant is aluminum oxide, for example.


The biggest point I’m trying to get across is if you’re a federal Nazi that wants to force inject people with experimental medications not approved for safety, and you also want to punish people for not going along with a highly illegal federal mandate under EO from ********* Joe Biden, then my question is do you even want to have the ability to have an open casket burial?

There’s something like 500 million civilian owned guns in the United States.

It’s my body, my choice, and a *****’s body isn’t a woman’s body. Forced medicine is literally what the Nazis used to justify the holocaust, because those people were medically “inferior” to what the Nazis eugenicists considered a healthy person, like the Nazi eugenicists called the Rockefellers or Gates family.

Are you prepared to fight a civil war, Rob?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Instead of all that typing, you could have just told me you can’t provide the answer or the proof.

Odd that you bring up a *****. Lemme ask you, what happens if the parasitic ***** is removed from the host?
You’re saying it’s not ok for the government to tell you what to do with YOUR body, but it’s OK for the government to tell a woman what she must do with HER body.

That’s quite interesting. And hypocritical, and chauvinistic. Nice hat trick.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It's not her body. All women are the property of men. She better not do shit without HIS permission.

Parasitic *****... interesting euphemism. Everyone knows the fatherless bastard child will grow up to be an oversensitive non-gendered future school yard shooter with an AR-15.

They need to inject them with COVID-19 and the Monkeypox. En-utero natural Democrat anti-venom... I mean vaccines!!!

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

It's not her body. All women are the property of men. She better not do shit without HIS permission.

Parasitic *****... interesting euphemism. Everyone knows the fatherless bastard child will grow up to be an oversensitive non-gendered future school yard shooter with an AR-15.

They need to inject them with COVID-19 and the Monkeypox. En-utero natural Democrat anti-venom... I mean vaccines!!!

Humor box.