Winners only.

[Jesus Christ]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob, it is just an accusation. Adding words like "credible" in front of it doesn't change what it is. An accusation. Nothing more, nothing less. Trying to make it sound more convincing by adding a description to the word only works on people with lower intellects like yourself. That's why it is done... to suade people to one side or the other. Credible or not... can't prove it then you have no case or cause for your anger.

Dumb fuuck huh? Well seeing how YOU said there IS 4 feet of snow on the ground and the research shows you to be an over exaggerating liar, I'd say you are the dumb fuuck. Maybe it's just me, maybe I am fuucked up. I guess facts only work if YOU quote them. This reinforces an earlier statement I made that nothing can be proven to you. Now we know why. Only your facts are valid.

You consider memes ("Joe's a pedo!") and verbal claims ("energy independent!!") to be credible and factual but when a lawyer takes a case against the POTUS, you think it has no credibility because it's "just accusation" and you wouldn't believe a woman was ***** unless you witnessed it yourself (fvcking weirdo pervert).
You're either lying about your age, or you are mentally challenged.
Yes, DUMBFUCK. "Research says"? Show me the "research", you mental case.

You might be able to prove something if you actually presented some facts and evidence instead of your personal assurances and insistences that you are correct, followed by "I already proved that".

Provide proof for ANY ONE of the instances I requested it. JUST ONCE.
How about proving we were "energy independent" in 2019, when we underproduced our oil needs by 8 Million gallons per day?

Maybe go easier and prove the Oxford English Dictionary is incorrect, and "no different" than any other dictionary?

Maybe explain how gas prices are not set by supply and demand via the commodities exchanges?

Better yet, explain how it's impossible for 99.4% of a million people to be vaccinated.

Perhaps tell us why you can't have 40% of 90.

Or explain how it's not possible that someone can pay the national average price for gas (because the average is a number only used to show if prices are rising or falling).

Maybe that monoleaf springs is not possible?

And that's just the tip of the iceberg for your lack of knowledge.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 36169

44%. Still higher then your lord and savior Trump, who claimed all polls are lies.
Are they now all truths? Pick a direction, dummy.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You consider memes ("Joe's a pedo!") and verbal claims ("energy independent!!") to be credible and factual but when a lawyer takes a case against the POTUS, you think it has no credibility because it's "just accusation" and you wouldn't believe a woman was ***** unless you witnessed it yourself (fvcking weirdo pervert).
You're either lying about your age, or you are mentally challenged.
Yes, DUMBFUCK. "Research says"? Show me the "research", you mental case.

You might be able to prove something if you actually presented some facts and evidence instead of your personal assurances and insistences that you are correct, followed by "I already proved that".

Provide proof for ANY ONE of the instances I requested it. JUST ONCE.
How about proving we were "energy independent" in 2019, when we underproduced our oil needs by 8 Million gallons per day?

Maybe go easier and prove the Oxford English Dictionary is incorrect, and "no different" than any other dictionary?

Maybe explain how gas prices are not set by supply and demand via the commodities exchanges?

Better yet, explain how it's impossible for 99.4% of a million people to be vaccinated.

Perhaps tell us you can't have 40% of 90.

Or explain how it's not possible that someone can pay the national average price for gas (because the average is a number only used to show if prices are rising or falling).

Maybe that monoleaf springs is not possible?

And that's just the tip of the iceberg for your lack of knowledge.

See what happens when you are proven wrong. So triggered.

 

[Jesus Christ]

44%. Still higher then your lord and savior Trump, who claimed all polls are lies.
Are they now all truths? Pick a direction, dummy.

I knew you would cherry pick that one out of the bunch.....lol the only one you will try to argue with....hook, line, and sinker

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Rob, do you know what a meme is? They are meant to be funny. You are the one who is getting all bent out of shape about them. Everyone else knows they are comical but you... but everyone else are the problem right. Idiot.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

See what happens when you are proven wrong. So triggered.

Try again.
This time, answer the questions. Failure to answer means you CAN'T.
Here, I'll ask them again:

Provide proof for ANY ONE of the instances I requested it. JUST ONCE.
How about proving we were "energy independent" in 2019, when we underproduced our oil needs by 8 Million gallons per day?

Maybe go easier and prove the Oxford English Dictionary is incorrect, and "no different" than any other dictionary?

Maybe explain how gas prices are not set by supply and demand via the commodities exchanges?

Better yet, explain how it's impossible for 99.4% of a million people to be vaccinated.

Perhaps tell us why you can't have 40% of 90.

Or explain how it's not possible that someone can pay the national average price for gas (because the average is a number only used to show if prices are rising or falling).

Maybe that monoleaf springs is not possible?

Go ahead, provide your proof for any of these.
It's only going to get worse for you, because there are a ton more to ask. Each additional one makes you look dumber.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Try again.
This time, answer the questions. Failure to answer means you CAN'T.
Here, I'll ask them again:

Provide proof for ANY ONE of the instances I requested it. JUST ONCE.
How about proving we were "energy independent" in 2019, when we underproduced our oil needs by 8 Million gallons per day?

Maybe go easier and prove the Oxford English Dictionary is incorrect, and "no different" than any other dictionary?

Maybe explain how gas prices are not set by supply and demand via the commodities exchanges?

Better yet, explain how it's impossible for 99.4% of a million people to be vaccinated.

Perhaps tell us why you can't have 40% of 90.

Or explain how it's not possible that someone can pay the national average price for gas (because the average is a number only used to show if prices are rising or falling).

Maybe that monoleaf springs is not possible?

Go ahead, provide your proof for any of these.
It's only going to get worse for you, because there are a ton more to ask. Each additional one makes you look dumber.

Poor triggered libertard troll.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob, do you know what a meme is? They are meant to be funny. You are the one who is getting all bent out of shape about them. Everyone else knows they are comical but you... but everyone else are the problem right. Idiot.

Ahhh yes, like your "metaphor and whimsy" backpedal.
Fail.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Poor triggered libertard troll.

Provide proof for ANY ONE of the instances I requested it. JUST ONCE.
How about proving we were "energy independent" in 2019, when we underproduced our oil needs by 8 Million gallons per day?

Maybe go easier and prove the Oxford English Dictionary is incorrect, and "no different" than any other dictionary?

Maybe explain how gas prices are not set by supply and demand via the commodities exchanges?

Better yet, explain how it's impossible for 99.4% of a million people to be vaccinated.

Perhaps tell us why you can't have 40% of 90.

Or explain how it's not possible that someone can pay the national average price for gas (because the average is a number only used to show if prices are rising or falling).

Maybe that monoleaf springs is not possible?

Or is this all your "metaphor and whimsy"?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You consider memes ("Joe's a pedo!") and verbal claims ("energy independent!!") to be credible and factual but when a lawyer takes a case against the POTUS, you think it has no credibility because it's "just accusation" and you wouldn't believe a woman was ***** unless you witnessed it yourself (fvcking weirdo pervert).
You're either lying about your age, or you are mentally challenged.
Yes, DUMBFUCK. "Research says"? Show me the "research", you mental case.

You might be able to prove something if you actually presented some facts and evidence instead of your personal assurances and insistences that you are correct, followed by "I already proved that".

Provide proof for ANY ONE of the instances I requested it. JUST ONCE.
How about proving we were "energy independent" in 2019, when we underproduced our oil needs by 8 Million gallons per day?

Maybe go easier and prove the Oxford English Dictionary is incorrect, and "no different" than any other dictionary?

Maybe explain how gas prices are not set by supply and demand via the commodities exchanges?

Better yet, explain how it's impossible for 99.4% of a million people to be vaccinated.

Perhaps tell us why you can't have 40% of 90.

Or explain how it's not possible that someone can pay the national average price for gas (because the average is a number only used to show if prices are rising or falling).

Maybe that monoleaf springs is not possible?

And that's just the tip of the iceberg for your lack of knowledge.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ahhh yes, like your "metaphor and whimsy" backpedal.
Fail.

LOL biitch, I am telling you that you are the one who has the problem understanding what a meme is and somehow I am backpedaling????

Attempt by you to insult - Fail

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Hey Rob, you turd... if I say Biden is a Pedo, like you.. and I can't prove it, does that mean I have stop voicing my opinion on it? Let me help you... No, I don't because it is MMMYYYYYY opinion. You can't make me stop thinking anything and I don't have to prove my thoughts to you turdfurguson.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Provide proof for ANY ONE of the instances I requested it. JUST ONCE.
How about proving we were "energy independent" in 2019, when we underproduced our oil needs by 8 Million gallons per day?

Maybe go easier and prove the Oxford English Dictionary is incorrect, and "no different" than any other dictionary?

Maybe explain how gas prices are not set by supply and demand via the commodities exchanges?

Better yet, explain how it's impossible for 99.4% of a million people to be vaccinated.

Perhaps tell us why you can't have 40% of 90.

Or explain how it's not possible that someone can pay the national average price for gas (because the average is a number only used to show if prices are rising or falling).

Maybe that monoleaf springs is not possible?

Or is this all your "metaphor and whimsy"?
Tip of the iceberg, kid.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Whimsical enough?