What is?

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You’re a nimrod. Fact.

Assumption. But you think assumptions and feelings are facts.
Worked well for you, huh?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I knew it was coming! LOL haha .....but, but, but Trump! More lies to cover up the original lie...keep goin Rob your convincing us all

If you want to argue with the adults, at least learn to spell. You claim to be an adult; get an education like one.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

If winning arguments is really more important to you than children's wellbeing, then you aren't worth anyone's time. You win. You can have your internet trophy. You've made it quite clear that you aren't interested in facts.

How does this discussion affect children’s well-being?
And where is the proof that masks are hurting them? You are confident the proof exists, yet all the professionals are saying you’re wrong.

Quite a few people here who are convinced they know more than all the experts out there. Kind of odd, no?
Show these “facts” that you claim I am not interested in (in spite of me asking for them over and over from a bunch of people here, and never receiving any).

Facts, please. You, Sluggo, Thx, fakeJesus, etc. Please support you arguments with facts instead of feelings or beliefs.

If you are unable, that might be a real good reason to reconsider your arguments.

 

[Jesus Christ]

Quack, Quack, Quack @RobGMN

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

How does this discussion affect children’s well-being?
And where is the proof that masks are hurting them? You are confident the proof exists, yet all the professionals are saying you’re wrong.

Quite a few people here who are convinced they know more than all the experts out there. Kind of odd, no?

There are conflicting opinions. I'd rather be wrong and have kids be fine than be wrong and have kids be harmed.

 

[SlugButter]

Assumption. But you think assumptions and feelings are facts.
Worked well for you, huh?

It’s your world douchewhistle, I’m just livin in it.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

It’s your world douchewhistle, I’m just livin in it.

Stop wasting good oxygen, consumer.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

There are conflicting opinions. I'd rather be wrong and have kids be fine than be wrong and have kids be harmed.

Hmmm. That’s quite a sidestep.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

And once again i have yet to see anyone on here support/defend Trump....so who are you trying to argue with LOL...WOW.....are all democrats psychopaths or just you guys here at caraudio.com? Serious question

You must have missed the Jan 6th discussion.
All KINDS of defense for Trump. Some even claiming the events of Jan 6th never happened…

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

How does this discussion affect children’s well-being?
And where is the proof that masks are hurting them? You are confident the proof exists, yet all the professionals are saying you’re wrong.

Quite a few people here who are convinced they know more than all the experts out there. Kind of odd, no?
Show these “facts” that you claim I am not interested in (in spite of me asking for them over and over from a bunch of people here, and never receiving any).

Facts, please. You, Sluggo, Thx, fakeJesus, etc. Please support you arguments with facts instead of feelings or beliefs.

If you are unable, that might be a real good reason to reconsider your arguments.

Professionals are just people who get paid to do a job. Doesn't mean they know anything. An expert in a specific field is a different story.

Here is my "argument" if you will Rob. I read an article about ivermectin and in the article was stated what I posted. You basically called me a liar because YOU need proof. Either you don't trust anyone, are literally just here to argue, think only you are right, think only your views and answers are correct or everyone is against the government.

Since YOU think I am a liar, prove to ME that the article I read and then posted about does not exist. It's easy for you to sit there and "call b.s." and demand proof from everyone but I bet you have no interest what so ever in finding it, reading it, saying hey, you were right... this article does indeed say what you said it says, maybe I should rethink a few things and look at things from more than one side.

 

[SlugButter]

You must have missed the Jan 6th discussion.
All KINDS of defense for Trump. Some even claiming the events of Jan 6th never happened…

Who claims January 6th never happened? I heard people claim it was a riot, not an insurrection, but I’ve actually never heard anyone claim it didn’t happen. If facts matter, be specific.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Who claims January 6th never happened? I heard people claim it was a riot, not an insurrection, but I’ve actually never heard anyone claim it didn’t happen. If facts matter, be specific.

Thxone did. About a dozen times.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Thxone did. About a dozen times.

Yeah... it's all liberal propaganda. An insurrection never happened. Make it a bakers dozen.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Professionals are just people who get paid to do a job. Doesn't mean they know anything. An expert in a specific field is a different story.

Here is my "argument" if you will Rob. I read an article about ivermectin and in the article was stated what I posted. You basically called me a liar because YOU need proof. Either you don't trust anyone, are literally just here to argue, think only you are right, think only your views and answers are correct or everyone is against the government.

Since YOU think I am a liar, prove to ME that the article I read and then posted about does not exist. It's easy for you to sit there and "call b.s." and demand proof from everyone but I bet you have no interest what so ever in finding it, reading it, saying hey, you were right... this article does indeed say what you said it says, maybe I should rethink a few things and look at things from more than one side.

Not how proofs work. You make a claim, YOU back up the claim.

YOU claim that WHO and NIH support Ivermectin as a treatment and/or prevention of COVID. I, in turn, provide quotes direct from the websites of WHO and NIH that are contrary to your claim.
This means your claims are inaccurate (a “lie” if you wish) until you prove otherwise. It’s not incumbent on me to find your proof for you when I have already disproved you.

That’s how argument, debate, discourse, and discussion are done. And how they’ve been done for centuries. This is not a new thing.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Not how proofs work. You make a claim, YOU back up the claim.

YOU claim that WHO and NIH support Ivermectin as a treatment and/or prevention of COVID. I, in turn, provide quotes direct from the websites of WHO and NIH that are contrary to your claim.
This means your claims are inaccurate (a “lie” if you wish) until you prove otherwise. It’s not incumbent on me to find your proof for you when I have already disproved you.

That’s how argument, debate, discourse, and discussion are done. And how they’ve been done for centuries. This is not a new thing.

Again you apparently see what you want to see. I never once said the WHO and NIH support ivermectin. PAY ATTENTION BEFORE YOU TALK. I said they both made statements that ivermectin was effective against COVID and that in the same article they then said not to use it because they did not have enough data.

Where in that statement did you pull your accusation from... oh yes... your arse.